Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jamesongreen2 sentences2012In challenging the trial court's decision to revoke and reinstate his probation, Johnson "must show that the evidence of a probation violation, viewed in a light most favorable to the trial court's findings, is so deficient that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking [his] probation." See Jameson, 800 P.2d at 804 (footnote omitted). 2012In challenging the trial court’s decision to revoke and reinstate his probation, Johnson “must show that the evidence of a probation violation, viewed in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings, is so deficient that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking [his] probation.” See Jameson, 800 P.2d at 804 (footnote omitted). ¶3 Johnson was required to maintain verifiable full‐time employment as a condition of his probation for a March 2007 conviction of securities fraud. | 4 | 7 |
State v. Legggreen2 sentences2017See State v. Legg, 2014 UT App 80, ¶ 7 , 324 P.3d 656 . “[W]e view the evidence of a probation violation in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings and substitute our own judgment only if the evidence is so deficient as to render the court’s action an abuse of discretion.” State v. Maestas, 2000 UT App 22, ¶ 12 , 997 P.2d 314 . 2017See State v. Legg, 2014 UT App 80, ¶ 7 , 324 P.3d 656 . “[W]e view the evidence of a probation violation in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings and substitute our own judgment only if the evidence is so deficient as to render the court’s action an abuse of discretion.” State v. Maestas, 2000 UT App 22, ¶ 12 , 997 P.2d 314 . | 3 | 3 |
State v. Maestasgreen2 sentences2020Accordingly, “we view the evidence of a probation violation in a light most favorable to the [district] court’s findings and substitute our own judgment only if the evidence is so deficient as to render the court’s action an abuse of discretion.” State v. Maestas, 2000 UT App 22, ¶ 12 , 997 P.2d 314 . 2020Thus, “we view the evidence of a probation violation in a light most favorable to the [district] court’s findings and substitute our own judgment only if the evidence is so deficient as to render the court’s action an abuse of discretion.” Id. | 2 | 5 |
State v. Petersongreen2 sentences2016State v. Legg, 2014 UT App 80, ¶¶ 2, 7 , 324 P.3d 656 ; State v. Peterson, 869 P.2d 989, 991 (Utah Ct. App. 1994). 2000See State v. Peterson, 869 P.2d 989, 991 (Utah Ct.App.1994). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Archuletagreen2 sentences1994Thus, in order to prevail in this case, defendant “must show that the evidence of a probation violation, viewed in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings, is so deficient that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking defendant’s probation.” Jameson, 800 P.2d at 804 (footnote omitted); Archuleta, 812 P.2d at 82 . 1992In order to prevail, an appellant “must show that the evidence of a probation violation, viewed in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings, is so deficient that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking [appellant’s] probation.” State v. Archuleta, 812 P.2d 80, 82 (Utah 1991) (quoting Jameson, 800 P.2d at 804 ). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Boysza
neutral
1 sentence2020ANALYSIS ¶8 “To revoke probation, the [district] court must find a violation of the probation agreement by a preponderance of the 20180670-CA 4 2020 UT App 8 State v. Boysza evidence. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Smit
green
2 sentences2017Because Rogers did not preserve the issues he seeks to raise on appeal, he claims that the district court committed plain error, “To demonstrate plain error, a defendant has the burden of showing (i) an error exists; (ii) the error should have been obvious to the trial court; and (iii) the error is harmful.” State v. Smit, 2004 UT App 222, ¶ 28 , 95 P.3d 1203 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2017Because Rogers did not preserve the issues he seeks to raise on appeal, he claims that the district court committed plain error, “To demonstrate plain error, a defendant has the burden of showing (i) an error exists; (ii) the error should have been obvious to the trial court; and (iii) the error is harmful.” State v. Smit, 2004 UT App 222, ¶ 28 , 95 P.3d 1203 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Orr
green
2 sentences2016"Therefore, to reverse the district court's decision in 'such proceedings, a reviewing court must determine 'that the evidence of a probation violation, viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court's findings, is so deficient that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking defendant's probation.'" State v. Orr, 2005 UT 92, ¶ 19 , 127 P.3d 1213 . 2016"Therefore, to reverse the district court's decision in 'such proceedings, a reviewing court must determine 'that the evidence of a probation violation, viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court's findings, is so deficient that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking defendant's probation.'" State v. Orr, 2005 UT 92, ¶ 19 , 127 P.3d 1213 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.