Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sheared2 sentences2009See Shea, 85 Wash.App. at 60 , 930 P.2d 1232 , overruled by Vickers, 107 Wash.App. at 967 n. 10, 29 P.3d 752 . ¶ 25 Moreover, we are satisfied no due process violation occurred. 2009See Shea, 85 Wn. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Vickersgreen1 sentence2009See Shea, 85 Wash.App. at 60 , 930 P.2d 1232 , overruled by Vickers, 107 Wash.App. at 967 n. 10, 29 P.3d 752 . ¶ 25 Moreover, we are satisfied no due process violation occurred. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Vickersgreen1 sentence2009See Shea, 85 Wash.App. at 60 , 930 P.2d 1232 , overruled by Vickers, 107 Wash.App. at 967 n. 10, 29 P.3d 752 . ¶ 25 Moreover, we are satisfied no due process violation occurred. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sheared2 sentences2009See Shea, 85 Wash.App. at 60 , 930 P.2d 1232 , overruled by Vickers, 107 Wash.App. at 967 n. 10, 29 P.3d 752 . ¶ 25 Moreover, we are satisfied no due process violation occurred. 2009See Shea, 85 Wn. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2016To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance, Sweet must show (1) his attorney's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) resulting prejudice, that is, a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different absent the deficient performance.18 The reviewing court strongly presumes that counsel's conduct constituted sound trial strategy.19 If one of the two prongs of the test is absent, we need not inquire further.20 Sweet asserts that "there could be no legitimate trial strategy in failing to object... to the prosecutor's improper clo 2016To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance, Sweet must show (1) his attorney's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) resulting prejudice, that is, a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different absent the deficient performance.18 The reviewing court strongly presumes that counsel's conduct constituted sound trial strategy.19 If one of the two prongs of the test is absent, we need not inquire further.20 Sweet asserts that "there could be no legitimate trial strategy in failing to object... to the prosecutor's improper clo | 8 | 2013–2020 |
State v. Foster
green
2 sentences2020Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 ; State v. Foster, 140 Wn. 2020Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 ; State v. Foster, 140 Wn. | 6 | 2013–2020 |
State v. Hendrickson
green
2 sentences2014State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996). ¶23 The first alleged deficiency is immaterial. 2014State v. Hendrickson. 129Wn.2d 61, 78, 917 P.2d 563 (1996). | 2 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Wilson
green
1 sentence2025Wilson, 174 Wn. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Kalebaugh
green
2 sentences2016To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance, Sweet must show (1) his attorney's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) resulting prejudice, that is, a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different absent the deficient performance.18 The reviewing court strongly presumes that counsel's conduct constituted sound trial strategy.19 If one of the two prongs of the test is absent, we need not inquire further.20 Sweet asserts that "there could be no legitimate trial strategy in failing to object... to the prosecutor's improper clo 2016To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance, Sweet must show (1) his attorney's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) resulting prejudice, that is, a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different absent the deficient performance.18 The reviewing court strongly presumes that counsel's conduct constituted sound trial strategy.19 If one of the two prongs of the test is absent, we need not inquire further.20 Sweet asserts that "there could be no legitimate trial strategy in failing to object... to the prosecutor's improper clo | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. McFarland
green
2 sentences2014Ed. 2d 674 (1984); State v. McFarland. 127 Wn.2d 322, 334-35 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 6 No. 70303-0-1/7 defendant to show the absence of legitimate strategic or tactical reasons for the challenged conduct.17 If one of the two prongs of the test is absent, we need not inquire further.18 Here, Bartels's attorney had a strategic reason for stipulating that Bartels's alleged accomplices had pleaded guilty. 2014Ed. 2d 674 (1984); State v. McFarland. 127 Wn.2d 322, 334-35 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 6 No. 70303-0-1/7 defendant to show the absence of legitimate strategic or tactical reasons for the challenged conduct.17 If one of the two prongs of the test is absent, we need not inquire further.18 Here, Bartels's attorney had a strategic reason for stipulating that Bartels's alleged accomplices had pleaded guilty. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Hendrickson
green
1 sentence2014State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996). ¶23 The first alleged deficiency is immaterial. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Franklin
green
1 sentence1992State v. Franklin, 49 Wn. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.