Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Purleegreen2 sentences2020“The two prongs of this test are not entirely independent.” State v. Purlee, 839 S.W.2d 584, 588 (Mo. banc 1992). 2016Purlee, 839 S.W.2d at 588 ("The two prongs of this test are not entirely independent."). | 2 | 5 |
State v. Powellgreen1 sentence2016Consequently, "[a]bsent proof of actual possession, constructive possession may be shown when other facts buttress an inference of defendant's knowledge of the presence of the controlled substance." Id. (emphasis added); State v. Powell, 973 S.W.2d 556, 558 (Mo. App. W.D. 1998) ("The State is not required to show actual, physical possession of the substance to establish possession, but may show constructive possession by circumstantial evidence."). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barbergreen1 sentence1992State v. Barber, 635 S.W.2d 342, 343 (Mo.1982). 1 *588 The two prongs of this test are not entirely independent. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.