Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1920–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. DeWeesegreen2 sentences2023“Once an unequivocal waiver of counsel has been made, the defendant may not later demand the assistance of counsel as a matter of right since reappointment is wholly within the discretion of the trial court.” Id. at 376 . 2017But"[o]nce an unequivocal waiver of counsel has been made,the defendant may not later demand the assistance of counsel as a matter of right since reappointment is wholly within the discretion of the trial court." State v. DeWeese, 117 Wn.2d 369, 376-77 , 816 P.2d 1 (1991). | 1 | 9 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shoreline School District No. 412 v. Shoreline Ass'n of Educational Office Employees
green
2 sentences2009App. 956, 958 , 631 P.2d 996 , 639 P.2d 765 (1981), review denied, 97 Wn.2d 1009 (1982). ¶17 Ives, relied upon by the majority, illustrates an unequivocal waiver of arbitration. 2009Office Employees, 29 Wash.App. 956, 958 , 631 P.2d 996 , 639 P.2d 765 (1981), review denied, 97 Wash.2d 1009 (1982). ¶ 17 Ives, relied upon by the majority, illustrates an unequivocal waiver of arbitration. *314 There, the defendant answered the complaint, engaged in extensive discovery, including deposing witnesses and proposing and answering interrogatories, and fully prepared for a trial on the merits. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez
green
2 sentences2007Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 58 , 98 S. Ct. 1670 , 56 L. 2007Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 58 , 98 S. Ct. 1670 , 56 L. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Coulter v. State
green
1 sentence2012Coulter, 93 Wn.2d at 207 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Ives v. Ramsden
green
1 sentence2009Ives, 142 Wash.App. at 384 , 174 P.3d 1231 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Ives v. Ramsden
green
1 sentence2009Ives, 142 Wash.App. at 384 , 174 P.3d 1231 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Peoples Savings Bank v. Frank Bufford
green
1 sentence1920Mere possession up to the mistaken line without any claim of right or ownership beyond the true line is insufficient to constitute adverse possession or to work a disseizen of the true owner. . . .” See, also, People’s Savings Bank v. Bufford, 90 Wash. 204 , 155 Pac. 1068 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.