Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Texasgreen2 sentences2018See Moore, 137 S. Ct. at 1050-51 . 2018See Moore , 137 S.Ct. at 1050 -51 . | 2 | 2 |
Robinson v. Stategreen1 sentence2022See Robinson v. State, 972 So. 2d 1115, 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (reversing summary denial of rule 3.850 motion because claims were not conclusively refuted by the record). | 1 | 1 |
Price v. Fax Recovery System, Inc.green1 sentence2012See Price v. Fax Recovery Sys., 49 So.3d 835, 837 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“A party’s arbitration rights may be waived by taking action inconsistent with its arbitration rights.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Majorgreen1 sentence2011See State v. Major, 30 So.3d 608, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). | 1 | 1 |
Wright v. Stategreen2 sentences2003The trial judge denied Wright's motion, *866 noting that Florida's sequestration rule would be rendered "meaningless" if, after discussing the case with others, a witness were permitted "to testify in support of one side or the other, almost as if that testimony were tailor-made." [ Wright v. State, ] 473 So.2d 1277, 1279 ( [Fla.] 1985). 2003Wright v. State, 473 So.2d 1277, 1281 (Fla. 1985). [11] In footnote 6, the majority seems to rely in part on Wright's contemporaneous conviction of second-degree grand theft as a basis for rejecting the claim, although grand theft is not one of the crimes listed as a statutory basis for finding this aggravating circumstance. § 921.141(5)(d), Fla. Stat. (1983). [12] Because we have not yet determined how our Ring analysis would be affected in situations where an aggravating circumstance is struck, I would also grant Wright's motion to file supplemental briefing on the Apprendi and Ring issue. | 1 | 1 |
Aero Costa Rica, Inc. v. DISPATCH SERVICES, INC.green1 sentence2002"Statutes which govern substituted service of process are to be strictly construed and also, they must be strictly complied with." Aero Costa Rica, Inc., v. Dispatch Servs., Inc., 710 So.2d 218, 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). | 1 | 1 |
Ahern v. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd.green1 sentence2002See Ahern v. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd., 788 So.2d 369, 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) *243 (where an insurer wrongfully refuses to defend its insured, the insured may enter a settlement with the claimant establishing the insured's liability, and the insurer may not re-litigate the issue but is bound by the settlement unless it is found to be the result of collusion or fraud, or the settlement amount unreasonable). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tavares J. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
green
2 sentences2018In doing so, current medical understanding served as the basis for the rejection of Wright’s claim, which differentiates this case from Moore where the CCA relied on outdated medical standards and lay perceptions of ID. 2018In doing so, current medical understanding served as the basis for the rejection of Wright's claim, which differentiates this case from Moore where the CCA relied on outdated medical standards and lay perceptions of ID. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Michuda v. Benson
neutral
1 sentence2018It is unconstitutional to impose a death sentence upon any defendant with ID. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Shea v. Jones
green
1 sentence2018It is unconstitutional to impose a death sentence upon any defendant with ID. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Indian Harbor Ins. Co. v. Williams
green
1 sentence2014Co. v. Williams, 998 So.2d 677 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), is instructive as to how the workers’ compensation exclusion applies to negligence-based claims by injured employees. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
MacIas v. State
green
1 sentence2003Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order of denial, recede from our opinion in King, 835 So.2d 1224 , and certify conflict with the First District's opinions in Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); the Third District's opinion in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); and the Fourth District's opinion in Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Thames v. State
green
1 sentence2003Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order of denial, recede from our opinion in King, 835 So.2d 1224 , and certify conflict with the First District's opinions in Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); the Third District's opinion in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); and the Fourth District's opinion in Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Kirtsey v. State
green
1 sentence2003Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order of denial, recede from our opinion in King, 835 So.2d 1224 , and certify conflict with the First District's opinions in Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); the Third District's opinion in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); and the Fourth District's opinion in Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
King v. State
green
1 sentence2003Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order of denial, recede from our opinion in King, 835 So.2d 1224 , and certify conflict with the First District's opinions in Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); the Third District's opinion in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); and the Fourth District's opinion in Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Bingham v. State
green
1 sentence2003Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order of denial, recede from our opinion in King, 835 So.2d 1224 , and certify conflict with the First District's opinions in Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); the Third District's opinion in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); and the Fourth District's opinion in Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Hernandez v. State
neutral
1 sentence2003Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order of denial, recede from our opinion in King, 835 So.2d 1224 , and certify conflict with the First District's opinions in Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); the Third District's opinion in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); and the Fourth District's opinion in Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Hampton v. State
green
1 sentence2003Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order of denial, recede from our opinion in King, 835 So.2d 1224 , and certify conflict with the First District's opinions in Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); the Third District's opinion in Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); and the Fourth District's opinion in Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Neil
green
1 sentence1991In State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984), clarified, State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla. 1986), we established procedures to eliminate the racially discriminatory use of peremptory challenges as required by article I, section 16 of the Florida Constitution. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Castillo
green
1 sentence1991In State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984), clarified, State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla. 1986), we established procedures to eliminate the racially discriminatory use of peremptory challenges as required by article I, section 16 of the Florida Constitution. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Herring v. State
green
1 sentence1991With regard to Wright's claim of conflict due to his public defender's service as a special deputy, we find, as we did in Herring v. State, 580 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1991), that due process principles require an evidentiary hearing. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Knight v. State
green
1 sentence1984In addition, the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel do not follow the guidelines laid down in Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Camp v. State
green
1 sentence1979Camp v. State, 293 So.2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Ellis v. State, supra. Here the state neither traversed Wright’s motion nor did it offer additional evidence. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.