Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Wrightgreen2 sentences2001See Wright, 189 Ill. 2d at 19-40 (Freeman, J., specially concurring). 2001See Wright, 189 Ill. 2d at 19-40 (Freeman, J., specially concurring). | 2 | 2 |
Idaho v. Wrightgreen2 sentences1992The standard in section 115 — 10, which requires “sufficient safeguards of reliability” based upon the “time, content, and circumstances of the statement,” is in my view effectively the same as the Wright standard of “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness” based solely upon the circumstances surrounding the statement (Wright, 497 U.S. at 822 , 111 L. 1992The standard in section 115 — 10, which requires “sufficient safeguards of reliability” based upon the “time, content, and circumstances of the statement,” is in my view effectively the same as the Wright standard of “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness” based solely upon the circumstances surrounding the statement (Wright, 497 U.S. at 822 , 111 L. | 1 | 2 |
Weipert v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulationgreen1 sentence2025DCFS itself acknowledged before the ALJ that because DCFS was unable to obtain a video recording of E.B.’s forensic interview, the ALJ’s decision would be “a lot tougher without the benefit of viewing the CAC interview and hearing this from the victim’s mouth.” ¶ 95 Moreover, forfeiture is a limitation on the parties, and “we may relax the forfeiture - 20 - doctrine when necessary to maintain a uniform body of precedent or where the interests of justice so require.” Weipert v. Department of Professional Regulation, 337 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Flowers v. Mississippigreen1 sentence2024Flowers v. Mississippi, 588 U.S. 284, 303 (2019) (“The Constitution forbids striking even a single prospective juror for a discriminatory purpose.”). ¶ 28 IV. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Wright
green
2 sentences2017Rather, in a fact-specific analysis, the Wright court held that, where the Wright defendant had fully preserved the issue for appeal, and where the expert had been provided the specific study in question for review prior to trial, and the State had already obtained a favorable ruling on the motion in limine on that specific issue, the trial court erred in “barring any questions about [the study]” (Wright, 2012 IL App (1st) 073106, ¶ 132 ). 2016Rather, in a fact-specific analysis, the Wright court held that, where the Wright defendant had fully preserved the issue for appeal, and where the expert had been provided the specific study in question for review prior to trial, and the State had already obtained a favorable ruling on the motion in limine on that specific issue, the trial court erred in “barring any questions about [the study]” (Wright, 2012 IL App (1st) 073106, ¶ 132 ). | 4 | 2014–2017 |
Holland v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024The word ‘certification’ as used in this subsection means with respect to a domestic record, a written declaration under oath subject to the penalty of perjury ***.” Id. ¶ 17 Here, we agree with Wright’s claim that the trial court erred in barring the repair estimate as hearsay within hearsay. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Rickman v. Meier
green
2 sentences2023Therefore, under the Wright framework, any conveyance initiated by the husband (or dominant party) of property, which he had purchased with his income, to his wife (or nondominant party) was presumed to be gifted. ¶ 31 For further explanation, we turn to a supreme court decision, Rickman v. Meier, 213 Ill. 507 (1904), which occurred just a few years prior to Wright. 2023Therefore, under the Wright framework, any conveyance initiated by the husband (or dominant party) of property, which he had purchased with his income, to his wife (or nondominant party) was presumed to be gifted. ¶ 31 For further explanation, we turn to a supreme court decision, Rickman v. Meier, 213 Ill. 507 (1904), which occurred just a few years prior to Wright. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Kuehner
green
2 sentences2022The court agreed and granted the State’s motion to dismiss. ¶ 20 On appeal, this court agreed with defendant that Wright, despite his laudable efforts, failed to comply with the high bar set by the Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Kuehner, 2015 IL 117695 , 32 N.E.3d 655 , because Wright did not address two of the witnesses trial counsel allegedly failed to investigate. 2022The court agreed and granted the State’s motion to dismiss. ¶ 20 On appeal, this court agreed with defendant that Wright, despite his laudable efforts, failed to comply with the high bar set by the Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Kuehner, 2015 IL 117695 , 32 N.E.3d 655 , because Wright did not address two of the witnesses trial counsel allegedly failed to investigate. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. C.H.
green
2 sentences1993(C.H., 237 Ill. 1993(C.H., 237 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.