Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hillgreen2 sentences2016In Hill , inmates challenged the decision of a prison disciplinary, board finding them guilty of violating a prison rule prohibiting assault, and revoking good-time credits. 472 U.S. at 448, 105 S.Ct. at 2770 , 86 L.Ed.2d at 360 . 2016In Hill , inmates challenged the decision of a prison disciplinary, board finding them guilty of violating a prison rule prohibiting assault, and revoking good-time credits. 472 U.S. at 448, 105 S.Ct. at 2770 , 86 L.Ed.2d at 360 . | 1 | 3 |
Hill v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institutionred2 sentences2016The Massachusetts Supreme Court, “[without deciding whether the appropriate standard of review [was] ‘some evidence’ or the stricter test of ‘substantial evidence,’” overturned the disciplinary court’s decision, finding the record failed to present even “some' evidence ... [that] would rationally permit the board’s findings.” Id. at 449 , 105 S.Ct. at 2770 , 86 L.Ed.2d at 360 (quoting Hill v. Superintendent, 392 Mass. 198 , 466 N.E.2d 818, 822 (1984)). 2016The Massachusetts Supreme Court, “[without deciding whether the appropriate standard of review [was] ‘some evidence’ or the stricter test of ‘substantial evidence,’” overturned the disciplinary court’s decision, finding the record failed to present even “some' evidence ... [that] would rationally permit the board’s findings.” Id. at 449 , 105 S.Ct. at 2770 , 86 L.Ed.2d at 360 (quoting Hill v. Superintendent, 392 Mass. 198 , 466 N.E.2d 818, 822 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Stategreen1 sentence1999We have said that “the remedy of expungement is designed to preclude unwarranted collateral consequences from determinations arrived at with less than the requisite procedural fairness.” Allen v. State, 418 N.W.2d 67, 69 (Iowa 1988) (applying expungement provisions of former Iowa State Penitentiary rule mandating expungement if an alleged prison rule violation is not adjudicated in accordance with procedures contained in penitentiary manual of disciplinary policies and procedures; inmate not entitled to expungement where one of two charges of violation of disciplinary rules was overturned beca | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Safleyred2 sentences1996For a prison rule or regulation to be constitutionally valid, the regulation must be “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.” Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 , 107 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 96 L.Ed.2d 64, 79 (1987). 1996For a prison rule or regulation to be constitutionally valid, the regulation must be “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.” Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 , 107 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 96 L.Ed.2d 64, 79 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Claude E. Woods v. Larry Smithgreen1 sentence1996Compare Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 469 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995) (holding that if the inmate actually violated the prison rule for which he was disciplined, he had no retaliatory-discipline claim) with Woods, 60 F.3d at 1166 (prisoner violating rule might have a claim but “to state a retaliatory discipline claim inmate must allege and be prepared to establish but for the retaliatory motive the complained of incident ... would not have occurred”). | 1 | 1 |
Henderson v. Bairdgreen1 sentence1996Compare Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 469 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995) (holding that if the inmate actually violated the prison rule for which he was disciplined, he had no retaliatory-discipline claim) with Woods, 60 F.3d at 1166 (prisoner violating rule might have a claim but “to state a retaliatory discipline claim inmate must allege and be prepared to establish but for the retaliatory motive the complained of incident ... would not have occurred”). | 1 | 1 |
Henderson v. Bairdgreen1 sentence1996Compare Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 469 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995) (holding that if the inmate actually violated the prison rule for which he was disciplined, he had no retaliatory-discipline claim) with Woods, 60 F.3d at 1166 (prisoner violating rule might have a claim but “to state a retaliatory discipline claim inmate must allege and be prepared to establish but for the retaliatory motive the complained of incident ... would not have occurred”). | 1 | 1 |
Fichtner v. Iowa State Penitentiarygreen1 sentence1989The prison rule in question uses a similar phrase: the inmate “shall be permitted to offer evidence supporting his case.” (Emphasis added.) On the other hand, concerning the lack of a right of confrontation, we have spoken in terms of “opposing witnesses.” Fichtner, 285 N.W.2d at 759 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Kelly v. Nixgreen1 sentence1985Disciplinary hearings are not part of a criminal prosecution, Ponte v. Real, — U.S. -, -, 105 S.Ct. 2192, 2195 , 85 L.Ed.2d 553, 558 (1985), and drawing an adverse inference from a prisoner’s silence at his or her disciplinary proceeding is not invalid, Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 320 , 96 S.Ct. 1551, 1559 , 47 L.Ed.2d 810, 822 (1976); see Kelly v. Nix, 329 N.W.2d at 294-95 . | 1 | 1 |
Baxter v. Palmigianogreen2 sentences1985Disciplinary hearings are not part of a criminal prosecution, Ponte v. Real, — U.S. -, -, 105 S.Ct. 2192, 2195 , 85 L.Ed.2d 553, 558 (1985), and drawing an adverse inference from a prisoner’s silence at his or her disciplinary proceeding is not invalid, Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 320 , 96 S.Ct. 1551, 1559 , 47 L.Ed.2d 810, 822 (1976); see Kelly v. Nix, 329 N.W.2d at 294-95 . 1985Disciplinary hearings are not part of a criminal prosecution, Ponte v. Real, — U.S. -, -, 105 S.Ct. 2192, 2195 , 85 L.Ed.2d 553, 558 (1985), and drawing an adverse inference from a prisoner’s silence at his or her disciplinary proceeding is not invalid, Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 320 , 96 S.Ct. 1551, 1559 , 47 L.Ed.2d 810, 822 (1976); see Kelly v. Nix, 329 N.W.2d at 294-95 . | 1 | 1 |
Ponte v. Realgreen2 sentences1985Disciplinary hearings are not part of a criminal prosecution, Ponte v. Real, — U.S. -, -, 105 S.Ct. 2192, 2195 , 85 L.Ed.2d 553, 558 (1985), and drawing an adverse inference from a prisoner’s silence at his or her disciplinary proceeding is not invalid, Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 320 , 96 S.Ct. 1551, 1559 , 47 L.Ed.2d 810, 822 (1976); see Kelly v. Nix, 329 N.W.2d at 294-95 . 1985Disciplinary hearings are not part of a criminal prosecution, Ponte v. Real, — U.S. -, -, 105 S.Ct. 2192, 2195 , 85 L.Ed.2d 553, 558 (1985), and drawing an adverse inference from a prisoner’s silence at his or her disciplinary proceeding is not invalid, Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 320 , 96 S.Ct. 1551, 1559 , 47 L.Ed.2d 810, 822 (1976); see Kelly v. Nix, 329 N.W.2d at 294-95 . | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Stategreen1 sentence1984The language in subsection (5) upon which petitioner relies was contained in the postconviction act when we said in Allen v. State, 217 N.W.2d 528, 531 (Iowa 1974) that challenges to prison disciplinary procedures were not reviewable by an action for postconviction relief. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gwinn v. Awmiller
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
Harper v. State
green
2 sentences1996Id. 1993Id. at 421 . | 2 | 1993–1996 |
Matter of Foster
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 380–81 (remanding for termination of the involuntary commitment). 11 P.K. committed a major prison violation in January 2017 for assaulting a peer, and he received a minor report for punching and spitting at his cell door when officers were passing. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
2 sentences1999On this issue, one court has stated that expungement is only required when (1) the challenged disciplinary determination is not supported by substantial evidence; (2) there has been a violation of one of the inmate’s fundamental [constitutional] due process rights, as enunciated in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); or (3) other equitable considerations dictate expungement of the record rather than remittal for a new hearing. 1999On this issue, one court has stated that expungement is only required when (1) the challenged disciplinary determination is not supported by substantial evidence; (2) there has been a violation of one of the inmate’s fundamental [constitutional] due process rights, as enunciated in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); or (3) other equitable considerations dictate expungement of the record rather than remittal for a new hearing. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Guy v. State
green
1 sentence1991We said, “Prison rule 40 also does not contain language requiring the misused means of communications be received by the intended party.” 396 N.W.2d at 202 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Leonard v. State
green
1 sentence1991In examining a vagueness challenge to a prison rule, we have noted that “[a] determination of the sufficiency of notice provided by a rule must be examined in light of the alleged conduct.” Leonard, 442 N.W.2d at 275 (citing Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 757 , 94 S.Ct. 2547, 2562 , 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1984)). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Parker v. Levy
green
2 sentences1991In examining a vagueness challenge to a prison rule, we have noted that “[a] determination of the sufficiency of notice provided by a rule must be examined in light of the alleged conduct.” Leonard, 442 N.W.2d at 275 (citing Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 757 , 94 S.Ct. 2547, 2562 , 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1984)). 1991In examining a vagueness challenge to a prison rule, we have noted that “[a] determination of the sufficiency of notice provided by a rule must be examined in light of the alleged conduct.” Leonard, 442 N.W.2d at 275 (citing Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 757 , 94 S.Ct. 2547, 2562 , 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1984)). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Davis v. State
green
1 sentence1988As we observed in Davis, 345 N.W.2d at 101 , the remedy of expungement is designed to preclude unwarranted collateral consequences from determinations arrived at with less than the requisite procedural fairness. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Justin Gomes v. Michael v. Fair
green
2 sentences1986Gomes, 738 F.2d at 521-22 . 1986Gomes, 738 F.2d at 521-22 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.