14 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1919–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cavaliergreen2 sentences2015See State v. Cavalier, 96-3052, p. 3 (La.10/31/97); 701 So.2d 949, 951 (per curiam). 2014See State v. Cavalier, 96-3052, p. 3 (La.10/31/97), 701 So.2d 949, 951 (per criam). | 2 | 2 |
Roger v. Estate of Moultongreen1 sentence2011An insurer must expressly and specifically exclude a particular loss or claim from coverage, so that “ ‘[a]ny exclusion from coverage in an insurance policy [is] clear and unmistakable.’ ” Roger v. Estate of Moulton, 513 So.2d 1126, 1130 (La.1987). | 1 | 1 |
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.green2 sentences2009See, e.g., Meloy, 504 So.2d at 839 . 2009Meloy, 504 So.2d at 839 . | 1 | 1 |
Hammack v. Resolute Fire Insurancegreen1 sentence1990See Hammack v. Resolute Fire Insurance Company, 96 So.2d 612 (La.1957). | 1 | 1 |
Parks v. Insurance Co. of North Americagreen1 sentence1978See Parks, supra. The diagnosis of the doctors was that the plaintiff's loss of hearing was due to Meniere's disease, for which, according to the doctors, there is no known cause. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Danna v. Danna
neutral
2 sentences1960Danna v. Danna, La.App., 161 So. 348 . 1960Danna v. Danna, La.App., 161 So. 348 . | 2 | 1960–1960 |
State v. All Prop. and Cas. Ins. Carriers
green
1 sentence2009No insurance contract delivered or issued for delivery in this state and covering subjects located, resident, or to be performed in this state, or any group health and accident policy insuring a resident of this state regardless of where made or delivered, shall contain any condition, stipulation, or agreement limiting right of action against the insurer to a period of less than twelve months next after the inception of the loss when the claim arises under any insurance classified and defined in R.S. 22:6(10), (11), (12), and (13), or to a period of less than one year from the time when the ca | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Blum v. Cherokee Insurance Company
green
1 sentence2002Citing this Court's decision in Blum, supra, the court in Stephens v. Audubon Ins. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Causey v. Kansas City Bridge Co.
neutral
1 sentence1956Compensation for the loss of hearing was awarded on a finding from the medical testimony that the blow activated dormant syphilis which caused the deafness." In Causey v. Kansas City Bridge Co., La.App., 191 So. 730, 732 , it appears that Causey sustained an injury while performing services for his employer in the construction of the Mississippi River bridge at Baton Rouge. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Patterson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
neutral
1 sentence1947Co., 194 La. .106, 193 So. 478 , wherein an oil field worker, thirty-three years of age, suffering from a loss of hearing of 80% in one ear and 70% in the other, was adjudged by the trial court totally disabled and awarded the total disability benefits provided for in the policy. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
In Re Clover Ridge Planting & Mfg. Co.
green
2 sentences1941Co., 178 La. 302 , 151 So. 212, 222 , we held on rehearing that the effect, and the only effect, of such a loss payable clause was: “* * * to constitute the mortgagee a conditional appointee of the mortgagor to receive payment of the proceeds in case of loss, or, as said in Cooley’s Briefs on Insurance, vol. 3, page 2383, ‘an appointee to receive the money in case of loss.’ ” In that case the fire insurance policy was written in favor of the planting company with a loss clause attached to the policy and made part of it, making the proceeds in case of loss by fire payable to the Canal Bank & Tr 1941Co., 178 La. 302 , 151 So. 212, 222 , we held on rehearing that the effect, and the only effect, of such a loss payable clause was: “* * * to constitute the mortgagee a conditional appointee of the mortgagor to receive payment of the proceeds in case of loss, or, as said in Cooley’s Briefs on Insurance, vol. 3, page 2383, ‘an appointee to receive the money in case of loss.’ ” In that case the fire insurance policy was written in favor of the planting company with a loss clause attached to the policy and made part of it, making the proceeds in case of loss by fire payable to the Canal Bank & Tr | 1 | 1941–1941 |
First Municipality v. Bell
green
1 sentence1919Municipality v. Bell, 4 La. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.