7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1951–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fredericks v. Farmers Rel. Ins. Co. of NJgreen1 sentence2008For example, it may eventuate that plaintiffs original attorney, when attempting to negotiate the loss claim with defendant’s representatives, knew or should have known of the terms of the policy, and that such knowledge may be imputable to plaintiff. [Id. at 605,194 A.2d 497 .] In Nieder , the Supreme Court adopted the approach we had taken in Fredericks to determining whether an insured should be relieved of the policy’s twelve-month limitation upon filing suit based on-the insurer’s failure to notify her of that provision. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Grand Jury Investigation (Subpoena to Nino v. Tinari). Appeal of United States Attorneygreen1 sentence1989See also In re Grand Jury Investigation (Tinari), 631 F. 2d 17, 19 (3d Cir.1980); United States v. Alvarez, 519 F. 2d 1036, 1047 (4th Cir.1975). | 1 | 1 |
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,487, 15 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 428 in Re Grand Jury Proceedingsgreen1 sentence1989"Nor is the loss of the privilege confined to `the particular words used to express the communication's content' but extends `to the substance of a communication,' *222 since the disclosure of `any significant part' of a communication waives the privilege and requires the attorney to disclose `the details underlying the data which was to be published.'" In re Grand Jury Proceedings, supra, 727 F. 2d at 1356, quoting United States v. Cote, supra, 456 F. 2d at 145 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge Martinezgreen1 sentence1989See also In re Grand Jury Investigation (Tinari), 631 F. 2d 17, 19 (3d Cir.1980); United States v. Alvarez, 519 F. 2d 1036, 1047 (4th Cir.1975). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Pennicagreen2 sentences1982Although the specific rule has not been articulated previously in this State, we declare it to be that discipline or disbarment is warranted only where the evidence of unethical conduct or unfitness to continue in practice against an attorney is clear and convincing, [In re Pennica, 36 N.J. 401, 419 (1962)] Polk argues that there are no meaningful differences between attorneys and physicians with respect to the “dire consequences which may flow from an adverse finding” resulting in the loss of the privilege to pursue one’s profession. 1982Although the specific rule has not been articulated previously in this State, we declare it to be that discipline or disbarment is warranted only where the evidence of unethical conduct or unfitness to continue in practice against an attorney is clear and convincing. [ In re Pennica, 36 N.J. 401, 419 (1962)] Polk argues that there are no meaningful differences between attorneys and physicians with respect to the "dire consequences which may flow from an adverse finding" resulting in the loss of the privilege to pursue one's profession. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nieder v. Royal Indemnity Insurance
green
2 sentences2008In Nieder , the insurer allegedly delivered the policy only to the first mortgagee and not to the insured herself. 62 N.J. at 232 , 300 A.2d 142 . 2008In Nieder , the insurer allegedly delivered the policy only to the first mortgagee and not to the insured herself. 62 N.J. at 232 , 300 A.2d 142 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Reste Realty Corporation v. Cooper
green
2 sentences2006In Reste Realty , the Court reaffirmed the common law rule that a tenant's continued occupation of the leasehold for an unreasonable period of time after the basis for the constructive eviction arose would warrant a loss of the claim. 53 N.J. at 461 , 251 A. 2d 268 . 2006In Reste Realty , the Court reaffirmed the common law rule that a tenant's continued occupation of the leasehold for an unreasonable period of time after the basis for the constructive eviction arose would warrant a loss of the claim. 53 N.J. at 461 , 251 A. 2d 268 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Burke v. Deiner
green
1 sentence1989The Burke Court reconciled the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan "actual malice" standard with the standard set out in N.J.S.A. 59:3-14a by noting: As long as the statement is made within the exercise of the public officer's powers, it is privileged unless made with knowledge of or serious doubts about the falsity of the statement. [ Burke, supra, 97 N.J. at 478 ]. *114 In the present case, the trial court concluded that there was a factual issue "as to whether [defendant] had malice when she made the statements to the press." Under the Burke standard, however, it is clear that plaintiff could ov | 1 | 1989–1989 |
United States of America and Howard W. George, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Donald E. Cote
green
1 sentence1989"Nor is the loss of the privilege confined to `the particular words used to express the communication's content' but extends `to the substance of a communication,' *222 since the disclosure of `any significant part' of a communication waives the privilege and requires the attorney to disclose `the details underlying the data which was to be published.'" In re Grand Jury Proceedings, supra, 727 F. 2d at 1356, quoting United States v. Cote, supra, 456 F. 2d at 145 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Mnich v. American Radiator Company
neutral
1 sentence1957Mnich v. American Radiator Co., 263 App. Div. 573 , 34 N.Y.S. 2 d 16 ( App. Div. 1942), affirmed 289 N.Y. 681, 682 , 45 N.E. 2 d 333 ( Ct. App. 1942), is of some interest here, though we do not pass on the point there decided. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Mnich v. American Radiator Co.
neutral
1 sentence1957Mnich v. American Radiator Co., 263 App. Div. 573 , 34 N.Y.S. 2 d 16 ( App. Div. 1942), affirmed 289 N.Y. 681, 682 , 45 N.E. 2 d 333 ( Ct. App. 1942), is of some interest here, though we do not pass on the point there decided. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Combs v. Shrewsbury Mutual Fire Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1951In Combs v. Shrewsbury Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 32 N.J. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.