11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1882–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Soley v. VanKeppelgreen2 sentences2006However, "loss of the statute of limitations defense is not the loss of a defense on the merits as contemplated by T.R. 15(C)." Soley v. VanKeppel, 656 N.E.2d 508, 511 (Ind.Ct.App.1995). 2006However, "loss of the statute of limitations defense is not the loss of a defense on the merits as contemplated by TR. 15(C)." Soley v. VanKeppel, 656 N.E.2d 508, 511 (Ind.Ct.App.1995). | 2 | 2 |
Aznel v. Gassogreen1 sentence2024See id. | 1 | 1 |
Donald Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dept. Sean McCormack Asst. D.A. Denis Thomason, Donald Urrutiagreen2 sentences2006Rather, "demonstrating prejudice requires the party seeking dismissal of the amended complaint to show that it was unfairly denied the opportunity to present facts or evidence which it would have presented had the amendments been timely." Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dept., 91 F.3d 451, 461 (3d Cir.1996). 2006Rather, "demonstrating prejudice requires the party seeking dismissal of the amended complaint to show that it was unfairly denied the opportunity to present facts or evidence which it would have presented had the amendments been timely." Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dept., 91 F.3d 451, 461 (3d Cir.1996). | 1 | 1 |
Simmons v. State Farm &C. Ins. Co.green1 sentence2004Co., 111 Ga.App. 738 , 143 S.E.2d 55, 57 (1965), which noted the insurer's options for paying for the loss under the clause, but also noted that "no matter which alternative is chosen, the market value of the property ... after payment must equal the market value before the loss." Subsequently, in State Farm Mut. | 1 | 1 |
Munday v. Brissettegreen1 sentence2004Co., 111 Ga.App. 788 , 148 S.E.2d 55, 57 (1965), which noted the insurer's options for paying for the loss under the clause, but also noted that "no matter which alternative is chosen, the market value of the property ... after payment must equal the market value before the loss." Subsequently, in State Farm Mut. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beals v. Guernsey
neutral
2 sentences1986Beals v. Guernsey, 8 Johns. 446 (5 Am.Dec. 348); Kennedy v. Whitwell, 4 Pick. 466 ; Cooley Torts, page 457, and authorities cited. 1882Beals v. Guernsey, 8 Johns. 446 (5 Am. | 2 | 1882–1986 |
Simmons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
1 sentence2004Co., 111 Ga.App. 738 , 143 S.E.2d 55, 57 (1965), which noted the insurer's options for paying for the loss under the clause, but also noted that "no matter which alternative is chosen, the market value of the property ... after payment must equal the market value before the loss." Subsequently, in State Farm Mut. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Clark v. United States
green
1 sentence2000The attorney may be innocent, and still the guilty client must' let the- truth come out.” Clark, 289 U.S. at 15 , 53 S.Ct: at 469-70 (citations omitted). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Smith v. McFerron
green
1 sentence1995Smith v. McFerron (1989) Ind.App., 540 N.E.2d 1273, 1275 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Benke v. Barbour
green
1 sentence1989Loss of the Statute of Limitations defense would not be a loss of a defense "on the merits" that T.R. 15(C) discusses. "[The policy of [T.R. 15(C) ] is to facilitate decisions on the merits." Benke v. Barbour (1983), Ind.App., 450 N.E.2d 556, 558 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Livingston v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis
green
2 sentences1980In Livingston, supra, the court held that the loss in a claim for false arrest or false imprisonment occurs upon the date of the arrest. 1980In Livingston, supra, the court held that the loss in a claim for false arrest or false imprisonment occurs upon the date of the arrest. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Fish v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
green
2 sentences1952Co. (1947), 225 Ind. 448 , 75 N. E. 2d 57 , supra. We fail to find special circumstances iii the Ransbottom case, supra, (217 Ind. *415 452, 28 N. E. 2d 78 ) to give equity jurisdiction to cancel; therefore, we believe its holding that the insurer was entitled to a decree of cancellation was error. 1952Co. (1947), 225 Ind. 448 , 75 N. E. 2d 57 , supra. We fail to find special circumstances iii the Ransbottom case, supra, (217 Ind. *415 452, 28 N. E. 2d 78 ) to give equity jurisdiction to cancel; therefore, we believe its holding that the insurer was entitled to a decree of cancellation was error. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
National Life & Accident Insurance v. Ransbottom
green
1 sentence1952Co. (1947), 225 Ind. 448 , 75 N. E. 2d 57 , supra. We fail to find special circumstances iii the Ransbottom case, supra, (217 Ind. *415 452, 28 N. E. 2d 78 ) to give equity jurisdiction to cancel; therefore, we believe its holding that the insurer was entitled to a decree of cancellation was error. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.