Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mitch Grissim & Associates v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Tennesseegreen2 sentences2026“The measure of damages for a quantum meruit claim is the actual value of the services provided.” In re Est. of Marks, 187 S.W.3d 21, 32 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005) (citing Mitch Grissim & Assocs. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tenn., 114 S.W.3d 531, 537 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002)). 2026The party seeking to recover under a quantum meruit theory must therefore “present some proof regarding the reasonable value of the services rendered.” Id. (citing CPB Mgmt., Inc. v. Everly, 939 S.W.2d 78, 81 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996)). | 3 | 3 |
In Re Estate of Marksgreen2 sentences2026“The measure of damages for a quantum meruit claim is the actual value of the services provided.” In re Est. of Marks, 187 S.W.3d 21, 32 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005) (citing Mitch Grissim & Assocs. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tenn., 114 S.W.3d 531, 537 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002)). 2025In re Est. of Marks, 187 S.W.3d 21, 32 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005) (citing Mitch Grissim & Assocs. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tenn., 114 S.W.3d 531, 537 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002)). | 2 | 2 |
Doe v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc.green2 sentences2018Doe v. HCA Health Servs. of Tennessee, Inc., 46 S.W.3d 191, 197-98 (Tenn. 2001) (internal quotation and citations omitted). 2018Doe v. HCA Health Servs. of Tennessee, Inc., 46 S.W.3d 191, 197-98 (Tenn. 2001) (internal quotation and citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Paschall's, Inc. v. Doziergreen2 sentences2018They also met with prospective players and families to discuss their joining the organization. 3 Although this case deals with a quantum meruit claim, courts have held that “[a]ctions brought upon theories of unjust enrichment, quasi contract, contracts implied in law, and quantum meruit are essentially the same.” Paschall’s, Inc., 407 S.W.2d at 154 . -8- Mr. Cole used his own vehicle for thousands of miles of travel for East Coast Grays’ business during 2010 and 2011, and Mr. Caruso often traveled with him. 2017The confusion between these two concepts began over fifty years ago, when the Tennessee Supreme Court stated that “[a]ctions brought upon theories of unjust enrichment, quasi contract, contracts implied in law, and quantum meruit are essentially the same.” Paschall’s, Inc. v. Dozier, 407 S.W.2d 150, 154 (Tenn. 1966). | 1 | 3 |
Castelli v. Liengreen2 sentences2018Compare Castelli, 910 S.W.2d at 427 (outlining the five elements needed to establish a quantum meruit claim), with Freeman Indus., LLC., 172 S.W.3d at 525 (outlining three elements needed to establish an unjust enrichment claim). 2001In Castelli v. Lien, 910 S.W.2d 420 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995), the middle section of this court discussed in detail the doctrine of quantum meruit. | 1 | 2 |
CPB Management., Inc. v. Everlygreen1 sentence2026The party seeking to recover under a quantum meruit theory must therefore “present some proof regarding the reasonable value of the services rendered.” Id. (citing CPB Mgmt., Inc. v. Everly, 939 S.W.2d 78, 81 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996)). | 1 | 1 |
Bean v. Beangreen1 sentence2020Newcomb v. Kohler Co., 222 S.W.3d 368, 401 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (failure “to cite to any authority or to construct an argument regarding [a] position on appeal” constitutes a waiver of the issue); Bean v. Bean, 40 S.W.3d 52 , 55–56 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000) (“Courts have routinely held that the failure to make appropriate references to the record and to cite relevant authority in the argument section of the brief as required by Rule 27(a)(7) constitutes a waiver of the issue.”). 370 S.W.3d 347, 355 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). 7 been the rule since Tate v. Camp, that a forfeiture provision will not be | 1 | 1 |
Charlotte Scott Forbess v. Michael E. Forbessgreen1 sentence2020Newcomb v. Kohler Co., 222 S.W.3d 368, 401 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (failure “to cite to any authority or to construct an argument regarding [a] position on appeal” constitutes a waiver of the issue); Bean v. Bean, 40 S.W.3d 52 , 55–56 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000) (“Courts have routinely held that the failure to make appropriate references to the record and to cite relevant authority in the argument section of the brief as required by Rule 27(a)(7) constitutes a waiver of the issue.”). 370 S.W.3d 347, 355 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). 7 been the rule since Tate v. Camp, that a forfeiture provision will not be | 1 | 1 |
Newcomb v. Kohler Co.green1 sentence2020Newcomb v. Kohler Co., 222 S.W.3d 368, 401 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006) (failure “to cite to any authority or to construct an argument regarding [a] position on appeal” constitutes a waiver of the issue); Bean v. Bean, 40 S.W.3d 52 , 55–56 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000) (“Courts have routinely held that the failure to make appropriate references to the record and to cite relevant authority in the argument section of the brief as required by Rule 27(a)(7) constitutes a waiver of the issue.”). 370 S.W.3d 347, 355 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). 7 been the rule since Tate v. Camp, that a forfeiture provision will not be | 1 | 1 |
Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.green1 sentence2018Compare Castelli, 910 S.W.2d at 427 (outlining the five elements needed to establish a quantum meruit claim), with Freeman Indus., LLC., 172 S.W.3d at 525 (outlining three elements needed to establish an unjust enrichment claim). | 1 | 1 |
Myrtle Beach Hospital, Inc. v. City of Myrtle Beachgreen1 sentence2017For example, in Ridgelake Apartments v. Harpeth Valley Utilities Dist. of Davidson & Williamson Cntys., No. M2003- 02485-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 831594 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 8, 2005), this Court quoted favorably an Opinion from the South Carolina Supreme Court in which a quantum meruit claim was defined as a claim based upon a contract “implied in fact.” Id. at *9 (quoting Myrtle Beach Hosp., Inc. v. City of Myrtle Beach, 532 S.E.2d 868, 872 (S.C. 2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Lawler v. Zapletalgreen1 sentence2005Mitch Grissim & Assocs. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tenn., 114 S.W.3d 531, 537 (Tenn.Ct.App.2002); Lawler v. Zapletal, 679 S.W.2d 950, 955 (Tenn.Ct.App.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Chedester v. Phillipsgreen1 sentence2001See Chedester v. Phillips, 640 S.W.2d 207, 208 (Tenn. 1982); Farmer v. -4- Farmer, 528 S.W.2d at 542 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. McBride
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Farmer v. Farmer
green
1 sentence2001See Chedester v. Phillips, 640 S.W.2d 207, 208 (Tenn. 1982); Farmer v. -4- Farmer, 528 S.W.2d at 542 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Murray v. Grissim
green
1 sentence2001To support his position, Donovan relies on Murray v. Grissim, 290 S.W.2d 888 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1956). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Barr v. Plastic Surgery Consultants, Ltd.
green
1 sentence1999Thus, the quantum meruit claim was at issue w hen the eviden ce wa s admitt ed. See Barr v. Plastic Sur gery Co nsultants, 760 S.W.2d 585 (Mo.Ct.App. 1988) (evidence relating to claim disposed of by directed verdict was relevant and material at trial as issue was still viable). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.