Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Austin v. Healthtrust, Inc.-The Hospital Co.green2 sentences2008Austin v. Healthtrust, Inc. , 967 S.W.2d 400, 402 (Tex. 1998). 2008Austin v. Healthtrust, Inc. , 967 S.W.2d 400, 402 (Tex. 1998). | 5 | 5 |
Merritt v. Harris Countygreen2 sentences2019See Freeman v. Wirecut E.D.M., 159 S.W.3d 721, 729 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.); Merritt v. Harris County, 775 S.W.2d 17, 23 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, writ denied). 2010See Freeman v. Wirecut E.D.M., 159 S.W.3d 721, 729 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.); Merritt v. Harris County, 775 S.W.2d 17, 23 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, writ denied). | 3 | 3 |
Freeman v. Wirecut E.D.M., Inc.green2 sentences2019See Freeman v. Wirecut E.D.M., 159 S.W.3d 721, 729 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.); Merritt v. Harris County, 775 S.W.2d 17, 23 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, writ denied). 2010See Freeman v. Wirecut E.D.M., 159 S.W.3d 721, 729 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.); Merritt v. Harris County, 775 S.W.2d 17, 23 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
Hampton v. Statered2 sentences2004In the absence of such a legislatively created rule, we decline to impose one. [1] See Hampton v. State, 109 S.W.3d 437, 441 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (holding that "it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense, but rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to the lesser-included offense for the finder of fact to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted") (emphasis added); Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532 , 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) (holding same), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 6 2004In the absence of such a legislatively created rule, we decline to impose one. 1: See Hampton v. State , 109 S.W.3d 437, 441 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Skinner v. Stategreen2 sentences2004In the absence of such a legislatively created rule, we decline to impose one. [1] See Hampton v. State, 109 S.W.3d 437, 441 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (holding that "it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense, but rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to the lesser-included offense for the finder of fact to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted") (emphasis added); Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532 , 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) (holding same), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 6 2004App. 2003) (holding that “it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense, but rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to the lesser-included offense for the finder of fact to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted”) (emphasis added); Skinner v. State , 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2 |
United States v. Sultangreen1 sentence2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 1 |
Continental Coffee Products Co. v. Cazarezgreen1 sentence2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 1 |
Lozano v. Lozanogreen1 sentence2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 1 |
Richardson v. Stategreen1 sentence2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 1 |
Maldonado v. Stategreen1 sentence2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 1 |
Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwardsgreen1 sentence2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Stategreen1 sentence2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 1 |
Marathon Corp. v. Pitznergreen1 sentence2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Catastrophe Property Insurance Ass'n v. Council of Co-Owners of Saida II Towers Condominium Ass'n
red
2 sentences1996Relying on Blount and Saida Towers, we stated in Testoni that we have “required all statutory causes of action arising on a legislatively created claim to be brought before the agency as part of a contested hearing.” Id. 1996Relying on Blount and Saida Towers , we stated in Testoni that we have "required all statutory causes of action arising on a legislatively created claim to be brought before the agency as part of a contested hearing." Id. | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Gordon v. Sebile
green
1 sentence2010Id. (citing Tex. Civ. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Direct Sales Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp 2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Ingram v. United States
green
2 sentences2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp 2004HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (Vernon 2003). [3] Id. § 481.115. [4] Id. § 481.112. [5] Maldonado v. State, 998 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [6] Taylor v. State, 684 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (emphasis added). [7] Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959) (citing Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703, 711 , 63 S.Ct. 1265, 1269 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943)); United States v. Sultan, 115 F.3d 321, 329 (5th Cir.1997); Richardson v. State, 834 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd); see Marathon Corp | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Skinner v. Texas
green
2 sentences2004In the absence of such a legislatively created rule, we decline to impose one. [1] See Hampton v. State, 109 S.W.3d 437, 441 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (holding that "it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense, but rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to the lesser-included offense for the finder of fact to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted") (emphasis added); Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532 , 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) (holding same), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 6 2004In the absence of such a legislatively created rule, we decline to impose one. [1] See Hampton v. State, 109 S.W.3d 437, 441 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (holding that "it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense, but rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to the lesser-included offense for the finder of fact to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted") (emphasis added); Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532 , 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) (holding same), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 6 | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Garcia v. State
green
1 sentence1993Id. at 798-800 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.