need not make inquiry (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

need not make inquiry in Texas

15 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Kuyava v. State of Texasgreen
texcrimapp · 1976 · cited in 11 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1989–2021
2 sentences

2007Furthermore, "unless an issue is made of an accused's present insanity or mental competency at the time of the plea the court need not make inquiry or hear evidence on such issue." Kuyava v. State, 538 S.W.2d 627, 628 (Tex. Crim.

2004Additionally, “unless an issue is made of an accused’s present insanity or mental competency at the time of the plea the court need not make inquiry or hear evidence on such issue.” Kuyava v. State , 538 S.W.2d 627, 628 (Tex. Crim.

1111
Sims v. Stategreen
texapp · 1990 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1999–2010
2 sentences

2010“On the question of appellant’s mental competency, unless an issue is made of an accused’s present insanity or mental competency at the time of the plea, the court need not make inquiry into appellant’s mental competency, and it is not error to accept appellant’s guilty plea.” Sims v. State , 783 S.W.2d 786, 788 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no pet.); accord Manoy v. State , 7 S.W.3d 771 , 777–78 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1999, no pet.); Hall v. State , 935 S.W.2d 852 , 855–56 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

2010“On the question of appellant’s mental competency, unless an issue is made of an accused’s present insanity or mental competency at the time of the plea, the court need not make inquiry into appellant’s mental competency, and it is not error to accept appellant’s guilty plea.” Sims v. State , 783 S.W.2d 786, 788 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no pet.); accord Manoy v. State , 7 S.W.3d 771 , 777–78 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1999, no pet.); Hall v. State , 935 S.W.2d 852 , 855–56 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

33
Ring v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1970 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1976–2018
2 sentences

2018Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Kuyava v. State 538 S.W.2d 627, 628 (Tex. Crim.

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

22
Manoy v. Stategreen
texapp · 1999 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010“On the question of appellant’s mental competency, unless an issue is made of an accused’s present insanity or mental competency at the time of the plea, the court need not make inquiry into appellant’s mental competency, and it is not error to accept appellant’s guilty plea.” Sims v. State , 783 S.W.2d 786, 788 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no pet.); accord Manoy v. State , 7 S.W.3d 771 , 777–78 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1999, no pet.); Hall v. State , 935 S.W.2d 852 , 855–56 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

2010“On the question of appellant’s mental competency, unless an issue is made of an accused’s present insanity or mental competency at the time of the plea, the court need not make inquiry into appellant’s mental competency, and it is not error to accept appellant’s guilty plea.” Sims v. State , 783 S.W.2d 786, 788 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no pet.); accord Manoy v. State , 7 S.W.3d 771 , 777–78 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1999, no pet.); Hall v. State , 935 S.W.2d 852 , 855–56 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

22
Williams v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1973 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1976–1990
2 sentences

1990Kuyava v. State, 538 S.W.2d 627, 628 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306, 307-308 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

12
Ducker v. Stategreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Kuyava v. State, 538 S.W.2d 627, 628 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Ducker v. State, 45 S.W.3d 791, 796 (TexApp.-Dallas 2001, no pet.).

11
Godoy v. Stategreen
texapp · 2003 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007App. 1976) (unless an issue is made of an accused's present insanity or mental competency at time of plea, the court need not make inquiry or hear evidence on such issue); Godoy v. State , 122 S.W.3d 315, 320 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. ref'd) (same).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Hall v. State green
texapp · 1996
2 sentences

2010“On the question of appellant’s mental competency, unless an issue is made of an accused’s present insanity or mental competency at the time of the plea, the court need not make inquiry into appellant’s mental competency, and it is not error to accept appellant’s guilty plea.” Sims v. State , 783 S.W.2d 786, 788 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no pet.); accord Manoy v. State , 7 S.W.3d 771 , 777–78 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1999, no pet.); Hall v. State , 935 S.W.2d 852 , 855–56 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

2010“On the question of appellant’s mental competency, unless an issue is made of an accused’s present insanity or mental competency at the time of the plea, the court need not make inquiry into appellant’s mental competency, and it is not error to accept appellant’s guilty plea.” Sims v. State , 783 S.W.2d 786, 788 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no pet.); accord Manoy v. State , 7 S.W.3d 771 , 777–78 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1999, no pet.); Hall v. State , 935 S.W.2d 852 , 855–56 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

22010–2010
Tupper v. State neutral
texcrimapp · 1974
1 sentence

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

11976–1976
Helms v. State red
texcrimapp · 1972
1 sentence

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

11976–1976
Kane v. State green
texcrimapp · 1972
1 sentence

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

11976–1976
McClintick v. State green
texcrimapp · 1974
1 sentence

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

11976–1976
Lucero v. State green
texcrimapp · 1973
1 sentence

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

11976–1976
Heiskell v. State green
texcrimapp · 1975
1 sentence

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

11976–1976
Faz v. State green
texcrimapp · 1974
1 sentence

1976Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85, 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited; Kane v. State, 481 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); McClintick v. State, 508 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Tupper v. State, 506 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Heiskell v. State, 522 S.W.2d 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Helms v. State, 484 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Williams v. State, 497 S.W.2d 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Faz v. State, 510 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

11976–1976

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check