Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1968–1987 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Santiago v. Stategreen1 sentence1984See Santiago v. State, 444 S.W.2d 758 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Johnson v. State, 496 S.W.2d 72 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Wyatt v. State, 566 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); McMahon v. State, 582 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Vanderbilt v. State, supra. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded for consideration of the other two grounds of error. | 1 | 1 |
Wyatt v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See Santiago v. State, 444 S.W.2d 758 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Johnson v. State, 496 S.W.2d 72 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Wyatt v. State, 566 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); McMahon v. State, 582 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Vanderbilt v. State, supra. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded for consideration of the other two grounds of error. 1984App.1973); Wyatt v. State, 566 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); McMahon v. State, 582 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Vanderbilt v. State, supra. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded for consideration of the other two grounds of error. | 1 | 1 |
McMahon v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See Santiago v. State, 444 S.W.2d 758 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Johnson v. State, 496 S.W.2d 72 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Wyatt v. State, 566 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); McMahon v. State, 582 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Vanderbilt v. State, supra. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded for consideration of the other two grounds of error. 1984App.1973); Wyatt v. State, 566 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); McMahon v. State, 582 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Vanderbilt v. State, supra. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded for consideration of the other two grounds of error. | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Statered1 sentence1974See also: Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938, 952 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). *176 Clearly the State was not attacking the credibility of these two witnesses; indeed, its case was dependent upon the jury’s believing the truth of their trial testimony. 2 Therefore, the two grounds of error are without merit. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKnight v. State
green
2 sentences1968The two grounds of error relied upon by appellant are the same as those overruled by this court in the opinion affirming the conviction in McKnight v. State, supra. For the reasons heretofore stated, the judgment is affirmed. 1968The two grounds of error relied upon by appellant are the same as those overruled by this court in the opinion affirming the conviction in McKnight v. State, supra. For the reasons heretofore stated, the judgment is affirmed. | 2 | 1968–1968 |
Ex Parte Blazier
green
2 sentences1968The two grounds of error relied upon by appellant are the same as those overruled by this court in the opinion affirming the conviction in Ex parte Blazier, supra. For the reasons heretofore stated, the judgment is affirmed. 1968The two grounds of error relied upon by appellant are the same as those overruled by this court in the opinion affirming the conviction in Ex parte Blazier, supra. For the reasons heretofore stated, the judgment is affirmed. | 2 | 1968–1968 |
Gutierrez v. State
green
1 sentence1987Gutierrez v. State, 672 S.W.2d 633 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1984). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Labelle v. State
green
1 sentence1987The Court of Criminal Appeals again reversed, LaBelle v. State, 720 S.W.2d 101 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), remanding for considera tion of the final two grounds of error. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Jackson v. State
green
2 sentences1985Jackson v. State, 640 S.W.2d 323 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1982, pet. ref'd.). 1985Jackson v. State, 640 S.W.2d 323 (Tex.App.— San Antonio 1982, pet. ref'd.). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence1984See Santiago v. State, 444 S.W.2d 758 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Johnson v. State, 496 S.W.2d 72 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Wyatt v. State, 566 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); McMahon v. State, 582 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Vanderbilt v. State, supra. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded for consideration of the other two grounds of error. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Etter v. State
green
2 sentences1984Etter v. State, 629 S.W.2d 839 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th] 1982). 1984Etter v. State, 629 S.W.2d 839 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th] 1982). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Reeves v. State
green
1 sentence1982Reeves v. State, 566 S.W.2d 630 (Tex.Cr.App.1978). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Thomas v. State
green
1 sentence1982The Court of Criminal Appeals in Thomas v. State, 543 S.W.2d 645 (Tex.Cr.App.1976) has held that the defense has no right to inform the jury panel and the jury of the life sentence which is required to be imposed by the court after the jury’s affirmative answers to the 12.42(d) issues. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Thomas v. State
neutral
1 sentence1971In this appeal, appellant raises the same two grounds of error as were raised in Thomas v. State, 468 S.W.2d 805 , this day decided. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Anders v. California
green
2 sentences1971We have reviewed the remaining two grounds of error which appellant’s appointed counsel submits only “in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493” and find them to be without merit. 1971We have reviewed the remaining two grounds of error which appellant’s appointed counsel submits only “in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493” and find them to be without merit. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.