first degree violation in Connecticut

521 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2026 60 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (24)

Case	Followed	Cited
North Carolina v. Alfordgreen scotus · 1970 · cited in 22 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1985–2025 2 sentences 2019On February 14, 1991, the defendant entered a guilty plea pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 , 37, 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970), 2 to one count of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 53a-134 (a) (4) and one count of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (1991 convictions). 2019On February 14, 1991, the defendant entered a guilty plea pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 , 37, 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970), 2 to one count of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 53a-134 (a) (4) and one count of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (1991 convictions).	5	22
State v. Salamongreen conn · 2008 · cited in 15 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2008–2025 2 sentences 2014The defendant, Kacey Lewis, was convicted, after a jury trial, of assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (1), kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A), interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a (a), and possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). 1 The defendant now appeals from his conviction of kidnapping in the first degree, claiming that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support that conviction under the rule of State v. Salamon, 287 Conn. 2014The defendant, Kacey Lewis, was convicted, after a jury trial, of assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (1), kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A), interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a (a), and possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). 1 The defendant now appeals from his conviction of kidnapping in the first degree, claiming that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support that conviction under the rule of State v. Salamon, 287 Conn.	2	15
State v. Kelseygreen connappct · 2006 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2020–2022 2 sentences 2020In December, 2003, a jury convicted the petitioner of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-134 (a) (3) and felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-53c.2 See State v. Kelsey, 93 Conn. App. 408 , 889 A.2d 855 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006). 2020In December, 2003, a jury convicted the petitioner of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-134 (a) (3) and felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-53c.2 See State v. Kelsey, 93 Conn. App. 408 , 889 A.2d 855 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006).	2	3
State v. Kelseygreen conn · 2006 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2020–2022 2 sentences 2020In December, 2003, a jury convicted the petitioner of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-134 (a) (3) and felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-53c.2 See State v. Kelsey, 93 Conn. App. 408 , 889 A.2d 855 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006). 2020In December, 2003, a jury convicted the petitioner of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-134 (a) (3) and felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-53c.2 See State v. Kelsey, 93 Conn. App. 408 , 889 A.2d 855 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 928 , 895 A.2d 800 (2006).	2	3
State v. Murraygreen conn · 2000 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2007 2 sentences 2007See General Statutes §§ 53a-59 (a) (5) and 53a-3 (3) . . . .” (Citation omitted.) State v. Murray, 254 Conn. 472, 479 , 757 A.2d 578 (2000). 2007See General Statutes §§ 53a-59 (a) (5) and 53a-3 (3) . . . .” (Citation omitted.) State v. Murray, 254 Conn. 472, 479 , 757 A.2d 578 (2000).	2	3
State v. Garrisongreen connappct · 2022 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024	2	2
Kaddah v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen conn · 2017 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022	2	2
Sullivan v. Thorndikegreen conn · 2008 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2008–2011	2	2
State v. Marcialgreen conn · 2008 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2008–2011	2	2
State v. Mungroogreen connappct · 2007 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2008–2011	2	2
Miranda v. Arizonagreen scotus · 1966 · cited in 20 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1997–2025 2 sentences 2022J., and MULLINS, KAHN and KELLER, Js., concurred. 1 Specifically, the defendant was charged with two counts of home inva- sion in violation of § 53a-100aa (a) (1) and (2); two counts of burglary in the first degree in violation of § 53a-101 (a) (1) and (3); attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of §§ 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-134 (a) (3); two counts of conspiracy to commit home invasion in violation of §§ 53a- 48 (a) and 53a-100aa (a) (1) and (2); two counts of conspiracy to commit burglary in the first degree in violation of §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-101 (a) (1) and (3); and one 2022J., and MULLINS, KAHN and KELLER, Js., concurred. 1 Specifically, the defendant was charged with two counts of home inva- sion in violation of § 53a-100aa (a) (1) and (2); two counts of burglary in the first degree in violation of § 53a-101 (a) (1) and (3); attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of §§ 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-134 (a) (3); two counts of conspiracy to commit home invasion in violation of §§ 53a- 48 (a) and 53a-100aa (a) (1) and (2); two counts of conspiracy to commit burglary in the first degree in violation of §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-101 (a) (1) and (3); and one	1	20
Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.green conn · 1960 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1987–1995 2 sentences 1995The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (1) 1 and two counts of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1). 2 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the victim’s prior claims of sexual assault pursuant to Connecticut’s rape shield statute, General Statutes § 54-86f. 3 The defendant also claims that the trial court improperly denied his request to order the victi 1995The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (1) 1 and two counts of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1). 2 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the victim’s prior claims of sexual assault pursuant to Connecticut’s rape shield statute, General Statutes § 54-86f. 3 The defendant also claims that the trial court improperly denied his request to order the victi	1	4
State v. Thompsongreen connappct · 2011 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2017–2019 2 sentences 2019See State v. Thompson , 128 Conn. App. 296 , 298, 17 A.3d 488 (2011), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 928 , 36 A.3d 241 (2012). 2019See State v. Thompson , 128 Conn. App. 296 , 298, 17 A.3d 488 (2011), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 928 , 36 A.3d 241 (2012).	1	3
Misiti, LLC v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of Americagreen conn · 2012 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2017–2019 2 sentences 2019See State v. Thompson , 128 Conn. App. 296 , 298, 17 A.3d 488 (2011), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 928 , 36 A.3d 241 (2012). 2017State v. Thompson , 128 Conn.App. 296 , 298, 17 A.3d 488 (2011), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 928 , 36 A.3d 241 (2012).	1	3
Fairchild Heights Residents Association, Inc. v. Fairchild Heights, Inc.green conn · 2012 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2017–2019 2 sentences 2019See State v. Thompson , 128 Conn. App. 296 , 298, 17 A.3d 488 (2011), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 928 , 36 A.3d 241 (2012). 2017State v. Thompson , 128 Conn.App. 296 , 298, 17 A.3d 488 (2011), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 928 , 36 A.3d 241 (2012).	1	3
1525 Highland Associates, LLC v. Fohlgreen conn · 2001 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2008–2024	1	2
State v. Tinsleygreen connappct · 2020 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2021–2022	1	2
State v. Turnergreen conn · 2000 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2009–2020	1	2
State v. Jacksongreen connappct · 2002 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	1	2
State v. Jacksongreen conn · 2002 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	1	2
State v. Jimenezgreen conn · 2002 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	1	2
State v. Santiagogreen connappct · 2003 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2005–2013	1	2
Batson v. Kentuckygreen scotus · 1986 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2006–2009	1	2
State v. Youngsgreen conn · 2006 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2007–2008	1	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (56)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Whelan green conn · 1986 2 sentences 2014A jury found the defendant, Christopher Carrion, guilty of four counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2) and four counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53-21 (a) (2).1 The trial court rendered judgments in accordance with the jury verdicts,2 and the defendant appealed to the Appel- late Court, claiming, inter alia, that the trial court improperly had (1) permitted the state, under State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L. 2014A jury found the defendant, Christopher Carrion, guilty of four counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2) and four counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53-21 (a) (2).1 The trial court rendered judgments in accordance with the jury verdicts,2 and the defendant appealed to the Appel- late Court, claiming, inter alia, that the trial court improperly had (1) permitted the state, under State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L.	13	1993–2014
Bowen v. Peoples green scotus · 1986 2 sentences 2014A jury found the defendant, Christopher Carrion, guilty of four counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2) and four counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53-21 (a) (2).1 The trial court rendered judgments in accordance with the jury verdicts,2 and the defendant appealed to the Appel- late Court, claiming, inter alia, that the trial court improperly had (1) permitted the state, under State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L. 2009The defendant, Randal Licari, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of arson in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-lll (a) (3), 1 larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-122 (a) *636 (2) and 53a-119, 2 insurance fraud in violation of General Statutes § 53a-215 (a) (l), 3 and conspiracy to commit larceny in the first degree and insurance fraud in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48, 4 53a-122 (a) (2), 53a-119 and 53a-215. 5 The defendant claims: (1) the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted evidenc	12	1993–2014
Washington v. United States green scotus · 1986 2 sentences 2014A jury found the defendant, Christopher Carrion, guilty of four counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2) and four counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53-21 (a) (2).1 The trial court rendered judgments in accordance with the jury verdicts,2 and the defendant appealed to the Appel- late Court, claiming, inter alia, that the trial court improperly had (1) permitted the state, under State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L. 2009The defendant, Randal Licari, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of arson in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-lll (a) (3), 1 larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-122 (a) *636 (2) and 53a-119, 2 insurance fraud in violation of General Statutes § 53a-215 (a) (l), 3 and conspiracy to commit larceny in the first degree and insurance fraud in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48, 4 53a-122 (a) (2), 53a-119 and 53a-215. 5 The defendant claims: (1) the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted evidenc	12	1993–2014
California v. Tyberg green scotus · 1986 2 sentences 2014A jury found the defendant, Christopher Carrion, guilty of four counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2) and four counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53-21 (a) (2).1 The trial court rendered judgments in accordance with the jury verdicts,2 and the defendant appealed to the Appel- late Court, claiming, inter alia, that the trial court improperly had (1) permitted the state, under State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L. 2008The defendant, James Simpson, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2), 2 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 53-21 (a) (2). 3 On appeal, the defendant claims *636 that the admission into evidence of portions of a videotaped interview of the victim violated: (1) this court’s decision in State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743 , 513 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994 , 107 S. Ct. 597 , 93 L.	11	1993–2014
State v. Golding green conn · 1989 2 sentences 2020In this opinion the other judges concurred. 1 The jury found the defendant not guilty of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (1) and attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a- 134 (a) (2), and the court rendered a judgment of acquittal on those charges. 2 The vehicle and the surrounding area were searched by the police, who discovered no firearms, ammunition, or drugs. 3 General Statutes § 53a-59 provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) A person is guilty of assault in the first degree when: (1) With i 2020In this opinion the other judges concurred. 1 The jury found the defendant not guilty of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (1) and attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a- 134 (a) (2), and the court rendered a judgment of acquittal on those charges. 2 The vehicle and the surrounding area were searched by the police, who discovered no firearms, ammunition, or drugs. 3 General Statutes § 53a-59 provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) A person is guilty of assault in the first degree when: (1) With i	10	1991–2020
Doyle v. Ohio green scotus · 1976 2 sentences 2019The defendant, Garyl Alexis, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4)1 and threatening in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62 (a) (1).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court erred by admitting into evidence an unduly prejudicial photograph of guns that had minimal, if any, probative value, and (2) pursuant to Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 , 96 S. Ct. 2240 , 49 L. 2019The defendant, Garyl Alexis, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4)1 and threatening in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62 (a) (1).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court erred by admitting into evidence an unduly prejudicial photograph of guns that had minimal, if any, probative value, and (2) pursuant to Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 , 96 S. Ct. 2240 , 49 L.	8	2002–2019
Brady v. Maryland green scotus · 1963 2 sentences 2016The petitioner, Vinroy Hines, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he challenged his conviction for criminal attempt to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-59 (a)(1), 1 two counts of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a)(2), 2 kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a)(2)(A), 3 and criminal violation of a protective order in violation of Genera 2016The petitioner, Vinroy Hines, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he challenged his conviction for criminal attempt to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-59 (a)(1), 1 two counts of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a)(2), 2 kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a)(2)(A), 3 and criminal violation of a protective order in violation of Genera	7	1987–2020
Pinkerton v. United States green scotus · 1946 2 sentences 2003The defendant, Jamaal Coltherst, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of capital felony in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54b (5) 2 and 53a-8 (a), 3 murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54a (a) 4 and 53a-8 (a), felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c, 5 kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-92 (a) (2) (B) 6 and 53a-8 (a), robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (2), 7 robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-133 8 and 53a-135 (a) (1 2003The defendant, Jamaal Coltherst, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of capital felony in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54b (5) 2 and 53a-8 (a), 3 murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54a (a) 4 and 53a-8 (a), felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c, 5 kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-92 (a) (2) (B) 6 and 53a-8 (a), robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (2), 7 robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-133 8 and 53a-135 (a) (1	6	2001–2011
Crawford v. Washington green scotus · 2004 2 sentences 2022The jury found the defendant not guilty on that count. 8 The question of whether and to what extent unpreserved claims alleging violations of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S. Ct. 1354 , 158 L. 2022The jury found the defendant not guilty on that count. 8 The question of whether and to what extent unpreserved claims alleging violations of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S. Ct. 1354 , 158 L.	5	2007–2022
State v. King green conn · 1990 2 sentences 2022A Intentional Manslaughter and Reckless Manslaughter The defendant contends that the crimes of intentional manslaughter in the first degree in violation of § 53a- 55 (a) (1) and reckless manslaughter in the first degree in violation of § 53a-55 (a) (3) are legally inconsistent pursuant to State v. King, 216 Conn. 585 , 592–94, 583 A.2d 896 (1990) (King 1990), and State v. Chyung, supra, 325 Conn. 247–48. 2022A Intentional Manslaughter and Reckless Manslaughter The defendant contends that the crimes of intentional manslaughter in the first degree in violation of § 53a- 55 (a) (1) and reckless manslaughter in the first degree in violation of § 53a-55 (a) (3) are legally inconsistent pursuant to State v. King, 216 Conn. 585 , 592–94, 583 A.2d 896 (1990) (King 1990), and State v. Chyung, supra, 325 Conn. 247–48.	4	1991–2022
State v. Whistnant green conn · 1980 2 sentences 2009Those five lesser included offenses were manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (1), manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (2), manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), manslaughter in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56 (a) (1) and criminally negligent homicide in violation of General Statutes § 53a-58 (a). 3 A person is guilty of intentional manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm when, “[w]ith intent to cause serious physical injury to a 2009Those five lesser included offenses were manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (1), manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (2), manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), manslaughter in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56 (a) (1) and criminally negligent homicide in violation of General Statutes § 53a-58 (a). 3 A person is guilty of intentional manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm when, “[w]ith intent to cause serious physical injury to a	4	1986–2020
State v. Fauci green conn · 2007 2 sentences 2007In this opinion the other judges concurred. 2 After the close of the prosecution’s case-in-chief, the court granted the defendant’s oral motion for a judgment of acquittal as to the charge of criminal trespass in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-107 (a) (1). 3 After the parties filed their appellate briefs, our Supreme Court rendered its decision in State v. Fauci, 282 Conn. 23 , 917 A.2d 978 (2007), in which it concluded that the term “prosecutorial impropriety” is more appropriate than the traditional term “prosecutorial misconduct.” Id., 26 n.2. 2007In this opinion the other judges concurred. 2 After the close of the prosecution’s case-in-chief, the court granted the defendant’s oral motion for a judgment of acquittal as to the charge of criminal trespass in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-107 (a) (1). 3 After the parties filed their appellate briefs, our Supreme Court rendered its decision in State v. Fauci, 282 Conn. 23 , 917 A.2d 978 (2007), in which it concluded that the term “prosecutorial impropriety” is more appropriate than the traditional term “prosecutorial misconduct.” Id., 26 n.2.	4	2007–2009
McCoy v. Louisiana green scotus · 2018 2 sentences 2025He claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) denied his freestanding constitutional claim asserting, pursuant to McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U.S. 414 , 138 S. Ct. 1500 , 200 L. 2025He claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) denied his freestanding constitutional claim asserting, pursuant to McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U.S. 414 , 138 S. Ct. 1500 , 200 L.	3	2022–2025
State v. Kitchens green conn · 2011 2 sentences 2018This case returns to us on remand from our Supreme Court with direction to consider the claim of plain error raised by the defendant, Jayevon Blaine, in light of State v. McClain, 324 Conn. 782 , 155 A.3d 209 (2017). 1 The defendant previously appealed from the judgment of conviction of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (2). 2 We held in our prior opinion that the waiver of a claim of instructional error pursuant to State v. Kitchens , 299 Conn. 447 , 10 A.3d 942 (2011), precluded review of the claim of plain error. 2018This case returns to us on remand from our Supreme Court with direction to consider the claim of plain error raised by the defendant, Jayevon Blaine, in light of State v. McClain, 324 Conn. 782 , 155 A.3d 209 (2017). 1 The defendant previously appealed from the judgment of conviction of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (2). 2 We held in our prior opinion that the waiver of a claim of instructional error pursuant to State v. Kitchens , 299 Conn. 447 , 10 A.3d 942 (2011), precluded review of the claim of plain error.	3	2016–2018
State v. Milardo green conn · 1993 2 sentences 2017In State v. Milardo , 224 Conn. 397 , 618 A.2d 1347 (1993), our Supreme Court concluded that attempted sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53-72a is not a lesser included offense of attempted sexual assault in the first degree in violation of § 53a-70 because the former requires proof of an additional element not found in the crime of attempted sexual assault in the first degree, namely, that the defendant intended to compel sexual contact for the purpose of either the sexual gratification of the actor or the humiliation or degradation of the victim. 2017In State v. Milardo , 224 Conn. 397 , 618 A.2d 1347 (1993), our Supreme Court concluded that attempted sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53-72a is not a lesser included offense of attempted sexual assault in the first degree in violation of § 53a-70 because the former requires proof of an additional element not found in the crime of attempted sexual assault in the first degree, namely, that the defendant intended to compel sexual contact for the purpose of either the sexual gratification of the actor or the humiliation or degradation of the victim.	3	1993–2017
Connecticut v. Porter green conn · 1997 2 sentences 2003The defendant, Randy Kirsch, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), 2 manslaughter in the second degree with a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56b, 3 and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227a (a). 4 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) failed to conduct a hearing, pursuant to State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 68-69 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997 2003The defendant, Randy Kirsch, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), 2 manslaughter in the second degree with a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56b, 3 and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227a (a). 4 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) failed to conduct a hearing, pursuant to State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 68-69 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997	3	2003–2011
Practice Management Information Corp. v. American Medical Ass'n green scotus · 1998 2 sentences 2011Claims of evidentiary insufficiency in criminal cases are always addressed independently of claims of evidentiary error.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Coyne, 118 Conn. App. 818, 826 , 985 A.2d 1091 (2010). 4 Police officers discontinued their search in the woods for the dark clothing when they stepped on an “underground wasps nest.” 5 See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L. 2003The defendant, Randy Kirsch, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), 2 manslaughter in the second degree with a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56b, 3 and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227a (a). 4 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) failed to conduct a hearing, pursuant to State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 68-69 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997	3	2003–2011
Remeta v. Stovall green scotus · 1998 2 sentences 2011Claims of evidentiary insufficiency in criminal cases are always addressed independently of claims of evidentiary error.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Coyne, 118 Conn. App. 818, 826 , 985 A.2d 1091 (2010). 4 Police officers discontinued their search in the woods for the dark clothing when they stepped on an “underground wasps nest.” 5 See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L. 2003The defendant, Randy Kirsch, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), 2 manslaughter in the second degree with a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56b, 3 and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227a (a). 4 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) failed to conduct a hearing, pursuant to State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 68-69 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997	3	2003–2011
Lovilia Coal Co. v. Harvey green scotus · 1998 2 sentences 2011Claims of evidentiary insufficiency in criminal cases are always addressed independently of claims of evidentiary error.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Coyne, 118 Conn. App. 818, 826 , 985 A.2d 1091 (2010). 4 Police officers discontinued their search in the woods for the dark clothing when they stepped on an “underground wasps nest.” 5 See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L. 2003The defendant, Randy Kirsch, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), 2 manslaughter in the second degree with a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56b, 3 and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227a (a). 4 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) failed to conduct a hearing, pursuant to State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 68-69 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997	3	2003–2011
State v. Carpenter green conn · 1990 2 sentences 2009Carpenter, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which challenges his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), 1 as ordered in this court’s judgment in State v. Carpenter, 214 Conn. 77 , 570 A.2d 203 (1990) (Carpenter i), on appeal after remand, 220 Conn. 169 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L. 2009Carpenter, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which challenges his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3), 1 as ordered in this court’s judgment in State v. Carpenter, 214 Conn. 77 , 570 A.2d 203 (1990) (Carpenter i), on appeal after remand, 220 Conn. 169 , 595 A.2d 881 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1034 , 112 S. Ct. 877 , 116 L.	3	1991–2009
State v. Miranda green conn · 1998	3	2000–2005
State v. Waden green conn · 2004	2	2015–2022
State v. McKiernan green conn · 2004	2	2015–2022
State v. Schriver green conn · 1988	2	2010–2022
State v. Sivak green connappct · 2004	2	2015–2022
State v. Wells green connappct · 2007	2	2008–2021
State v. Pagan green conn · 2007	2	2008–2021
DiBlase v. LOGISTEC OF CONNECTICUT, INC. green conn · 2010	2	2017–2020
State v. Crump green conn · 1986	2	2019–2019
State v. Garvin green conn · 1997	2	2016–2019
State v. Latorre green connappct · 1999	2	2019–2019
State v. Sherman green conn · 2018	2	2019–2019
State v. Harper green conn · 2018	2	2019–2019
State v. Harper green connappct · 2018	2	2019–2019
State v. Marquez green conn · 2009	2	2017–2019
State v. Petion green connappct · 2017	2	2017–2019
State v. McCalpine green conn · 1983	2	2006–2018
State v. ANTWON W. green connappct · 2009	2	2012–2017
State v. Brundage green connappct · 2012	2	2014–2016
State v. Jones green conn · 2009	2	2016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-59 (152) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-70 (123) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-134 (121) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-49 (108) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-48 (107) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54a (94) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-21 (87) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-92 (72) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-55 (69) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-3 (60) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-86e (57) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54c (54)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 521 (1980–2026) NY 37 (1953–2025) OH 19 (1990–2026) HI 17 (1982–2024) MO 13 (1973–2025) OK 13 (1921–2023) WA 9 (1991–2019) CA 6 (1907–2025) IA 5 (1915–2019) AR 3 (1985–2020) KY 3 (1969–2008) DE 3 (1979–2016) MA 3 (1987–2020) FL 3 (1984–1993) CO 3 (1961–1995) AZ 2 (2001–2004) GA 2 (1993–1995) AK 2 (1991–1991) MN 2 (1996–2016) VI 2 (2010–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check