13 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1973–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Williamsgreen2 sentences1999We held there that, even though the attorney had not answered the specification of charges, the Hearing Committee “should have proceeded with an ex parte hearing to establish by sworn evidence that the ... charges [were] true.” Id. 1995See generally In re Williams, supra, 464 A.2d at 119 (before Hearing Committee concluded that disbarment was an appropriate sanction, it “should have proceeded with an ex parte hearing to establish by sworn evidence that the specification of charges was true”). | 3 | 4 |
Davis v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2010Davis v. United States, 567 A.2d 36, 38-40 (D.C.1989). | 1 | 1 |
Miranda v. Contrerasgreen1 sentence2007While we have held that a default judgment is void where service of process has not been effective, see Miranda v. Contreras, 754 A.2d 277, 281 (D.C.2000), we have never determined whether a default judgment is void because of a violation of due process due to (1) the lack of notice of an ex parte hearing or a hearing notice that was defective because it contained a computer-generated merger of the substance of the notice with the zip code and where counsel for the defaulting party presented a declaration indicating that he did not receive the notice; and (2) the trial court’s failure to follo | 1 | 1 |
Colacurcio v. City of Kentgreen1 sentence2002See In re Sofaer, 728 A.2d 625, 628 (D.C.), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1555 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000) (providing legal advice is clearly a feature of an attorney-client relationship). | 1 | 1 |
Cutshall v. Sundquistgreen1 sentence2002See In re Sofaer, 728 A.2d 625, 628 (D.C.), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1555 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000) (providing legal advice is clearly a feature of an attorney-client relationship). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Sofaergreen1 sentence2002See In re Sofaer, 728 A.2d 625, 628 (D.C.), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1555 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000) (providing legal advice is clearly a feature of an attorney-client relationship). | 1 | 1 |
Melka Marine, Inc. v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2002See In re Sofaer, 728 A.2d 625, 628 (D.C.), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1555 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000) (providing legal advice is clearly a feature of an attorney-client relationship). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Pearsongreen1 sentence1999See also, In re Pearson, 628 A.2d 94, 98-99 (D.C.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Durham v. District of Columbiagreen1 sentence1993See Durham v. District of Columbia, supra, 494 A.2d at 1350 (“trial court must be especially cautious where it chooses to impose the very severe sanction of dismissal”). | 1 | 1 |
Cleburn Lee Marshall v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1973United States v. Sutton, 464 F.2d 552, 553 (5th Cir. 1972); Marshall v. United States, 423 F.2d 1315, 1318 (10th Cir. 1970). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Harry William Theriaultgreen1 sentence1973United States v. Hamlet, 456 F.2d 1284, 1285 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam) ; United States v. Theriault, 440 F.2d 713, 715 (5th Cir. 1971); Marshall v. United States, supra at 1318. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. George Byron Hamletgreen1 sentence1973United States v. Hamlet, 456 F.2d 1284, 1285 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam) ; United States v. Theriault, 440 F.2d 713, 715 (5th Cir. 1971); Marshall v. United States, supra at 1318. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Clarence J. Suttongreen1 sentence1973United States v. Sutton, 464 F.2d 552, 553 (5th Cir. 1972); Marshall v. United States, 423 F.2d 1315, 1318 (10th Cir. 1970). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Winfield v. United States
green
1 sentence2021Moghalu’s Contention _______________ 24 Winfield, 676 A.2d at 6 n.6. 25 Jordan, 722 A.2d at 1262 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Jordan v. United States
green
1 sentence2021Moghalu’s Contention _______________ 24 Winfield, 676 A.2d at 6 n.6. 25 Jordan, 722 A.2d at 1262 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
JAMES EARL BLACKMON v. DAVID D. LEWIS
green
2 sentences2019Appellant, in an ex parte hearing at the bench, told the court, “If you can get the original . . . plea back[,] I[’]ll take it[.]” Id. 2019The prosecutor stated in open court, however, that the original 25-year plea offer “was no longer on the table.” Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Frederick Renee Ruffin v. Antoine Maurice Roberts
green
1 sentence2016Citing this court‟s decision in Ruffin v. Roberts, 89 A.3d 502 (D.C. 2014), Judge Iscoe stated that the “trial court does not have 5 As we explain below, the trial court did not rely on these grounds for its decision to terminate Littman‟s visitation rights. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Williams v. United States
green
2 sentences1981The court must provide a defendant with expert services under D.C.Code 1978 Supp., § ll-2605(a), whenever there has been a showing that the accused is financially unable to obtain the service and the service is “necessary to an adequate defense.” 11 Gaither v. United States, supra; Williams v. United States, D.C.App., 310 A.2d 244 (1973). 1981The court must provide a defendant with expert services under D.C.Code 1978 Supp., § 11-2605(a), whenever there has been a showing that the accused is financially unable to obtain the service and the service is "necessary to an adequate defense." [11] Gaither v. United States, supra ; Williams v. United States, D.C.App., 310 A.2d 244 (1973). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.