10 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1900–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Florida v. Nixongreen2 sentences2020See Florida v. Nixon , 543 U.S. 175, 189-192 (2004). 2020See Florida v. Nixon , 543 U.S. 175, 189-192 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Jackson v. State, 2001 OK CR 37, ¶¶ 10-16 , 41 P.3d 395, 398-99 . [6] We commend the district court for the manner in which the hearing was conducted, and for the thoroughness of its findings and conclusions. [7] Cf. Burns v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 307 , 541 S.E.2d 872, 883-84 (2001) (implementation of "traffic-canvassing detail," stopping motorists in the vicinity of a recent murder and asking if any suspicious activity had been seen, and which fortuitously resulted in the apprehension of the murderer, did not violate the Fourth Amendment). [8] In Lookingbill , the defendant was arrested a 2011See Jackson v. State, 2001 OK CR 37, ¶¶ 10-16 , 41 P.3d 395, 398-99 . [6] We commend the district court for the manner in which the hearing was conducted, and for the thoroughness of its findings and conclusions. [7] Cf. Burns v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 307 , 541 S.E.2d 872, 883-84 (2001) (implementation of "traffic-canvassing detail," stopping motorists in the vicinity of a recent murder and asking if any suspicious activity had been seen, and which fortuitously resulted in the apprehension of the murderer, did not violate the Fourth Amendment). [8] In Lookingbill , the defendant was arrested a | 1 | 1 |
Burns v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2011See Jackson v. State, 2001 OK CR 37, ¶¶ 10-16 , 41 P.3d 395, 398-99 . [6] We commend the district court for the manner in which the hearing was conducted, and for the thoroughness of its findings and conclusions. [7] Cf. Burns v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 307 , 541 S.E.2d 872, 883-84 (2001) (implementation of "traffic-canvassing detail," stopping motorists in the vicinity of a recent murder and asking if any suspicious activity had been seen, and which fortuitously resulted in the apprehension of the murderer, did not violate the Fourth Amendment). [8] In Lookingbill , the defendant was arrested a | 1 | 1 |
Burns v. Com.green1 sentence2011See Jackson v. State, 2001 OK CR 37, ¶¶ 10-16 , 41 P.3d 395, 398-99 . [6] We commend the district court for the manner in which the hearing was conducted, and for the thoroughness of its findings and conclusions. [7] Cf. Burns v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 307 , 541 S.E.2d 872, 883-84 (2001) (implementation of "traffic-canvassing detail," stopping motorists in the vicinity of a recent murder and asking if any suspicious activity had been seen, and which fortuitously resulted in the apprehension of the murderer, did not violate the Fourth Amendment). [8] In Lookingbill , the defendant was arrested a | 1 | 1 |
McGregor v. Stategreen2 sentences1991See McGregor v. State, 754 P.2d 1216 (Okl.Cr. 1988). 1991See McGregor v. State, 754 P.2d 1216 (Okl.Cr.1988). | 1 | 1 |
McGregor v. Stategreen1 sentence1988See McGregor v. State of Oklahoma, District Court of Hughes County, 733 P.2d 416 (Okl.Cr.1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe Criswell
green
1 sentence1990“The manifest purpose of the ex parte proceedings ... is to insure that defendants will not have to make a premature disclosure of their case.” United States v. Greschner, 802 F.2d 373 (10th Cir.1986). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas
green
2 sentences1973In A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1732 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964), the Supreme Court invalidated a state procedure where after an ex parte inquiry a judge ordered the seizure of a large quantity of allegedly obscene books. 1973In A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct. 1732 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964), the Supreme Court invalidated a state procedure where after an ex parte inquiry a judge ordered the seizure of a large quantity of allegedly obscene books. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Eisminger v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence1958In Conrad v. State Industrial Commission, supra [ 181 Okl. 324 , 73 P.2d 862 ], it is stated: “In considering the claim of an attorney for fees in a proceeding before it the commission should not act arbitrarily nor upon an ex parte hearing but only after an opportunity has been afforded all of the parties interested to be present and to present their evidence in support of and in opposition to the claim and to thereupon approve the claim in such amount as may be commensurate to the services rendered by the attorney, at all times having due regard to the rights of both the workman and the atto | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Conrad v. State Industrial Commission
green
1 sentence1958In Conrad v. State Industrial Commission, supra [ 181 Okl. 324 , 73 P.2d 862 ], it is stated: “In considering the claim of an attorney for fees in a proceeding before it the commission should not act arbitrarily nor upon an ex parte hearing but only after an opportunity has been afforded all of the parties interested to be present and to present their evidence in support of and in opposition to the claim and to thereupon approve the claim in such amount as may be commensurate to the services rendered by the attorney, at all times having due regard to the rights of both the workman and the atto | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Rees v. Andrews
neutral
2 sentences1923It should, therefore, exercise extreme caution in the appointment of receivers on ex parte applications, and be careful that a proper ‘case is presented before it acts; and it should not. be done without ‘ notice to the party whose property is to be affected, .except in cases of the greatest emergency demanding the immediate interference of .the court.” It was said in Rees v. Andrews, 169 Mo. 177 , 69 S. W. 4 : “All the cases concur in holding that before such an order is made the persons to be affected must have notice and an opportunity to be heard, and the only exceptions to this rule are, 1923It should, therefore, exercise extreme caution in the appointment of receivers on ex parte applications, and be careful that a proper ‘case is presented before it acts; and it should not. be done without ‘ notice to the party whose property is to be affected, .except in cases of the greatest emergency demanding the immediate interference of .the court.” It was said in Rees v. Andrews, 169 Mo. 177 , 69 S. W. 4 : “All the cases concur in holding that before such an order is made the persons to be affected must have notice and an opportunity to be heard, and the only exceptions to this rule are, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Jacksonville Ferry Co. v. Stockton
green
1 sentence1923It should, therefore, exercise extreme caution in the appointment of receivers on ex parte applications, and be careful that a proper ‘case is presented before it acts; and it should not. be done without ‘ notice to the party whose property is to be affected, .except in cases of the greatest emergency demanding the immediate interference of .the court.” It was said in Rees v. Andrews, 169 Mo. 177 , 69 S. W. 4 : “All the cases concur in holding that before such an order is made the persons to be affected must have notice and an opportunity to be heard, and the only exceptions to this rule are, | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Gundry v. Gundry
neutral
2 sentences1916His power to so proceed, it seems, is fixed in principle by the decision in Gundry v. Gundry, 11 Okla. 423 , 68 Pac. 509 . 1916His power to so proceed, it seems, is fixed in principle by the decision in Gundry v. Gundry, 11 Okla. 423 , 68 Pac. 509 . | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Conley v. Fleming
green
1 sentence1900It has been said that: "This is an ex parte hearing, without notice, and the writ should not issue unless the right is clear and unquestioned," and that "the supreme court of Kansas in the case of Conley v. Fleming et al., 14 Kans. 381 , said 'in the selection of a county seat the electors are not limited to existing cities and counties, but may choose a site for a new town, and locate the county seat thereon.' " The citation of authority is inapplicable. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.