13 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Grazianogreen2 sentences2000See In re Graziano, 696 So.2d 744, 752 (Fla.1997) ("The due-process concern involved with respect to the confidentiality requirement is whether the reported information prejudiced respondent's rights to a fair hearing."). 2000See In re Graziano, 696 So.2d 744, 752 (Fla.1997) (“The due-process concern involved with respect to the confidentiality requirement is whether the reported information prejudiced respondent’s rights to a fair hearing.”). | 2 | 4 |
DR Lakes, Inc. v. BRANDSMART USAgreen1 sentence2002See id. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hepburngreen1 sentence2000See State v. Hepburn, 460 So.2d 422 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). | 1 | 1 |
Eh v. State, Dept. of H & R Servicesgreen1 sentence1992I concede that two other cases which have considered this confidentiality waiver have (apparently) [2] not perceived the waiver to be this limited, Carson v. Jackson, 466 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); E.H. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 443 So.2d 1083, 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), but there is no suggestion this interpretation was directly raised in those cases. | 1 | 1 |
Elie v. Duggergreen1 sentence1990See Doe v. Gonzalez, 723 F.Supp. 690 (S.D.Fla.1988), affirmed, 886 F.2d 1323 (11th Cir.1989). | 1 | 1 |
Doe v. Gonzalezgreen1 sentence1990See Doe v. Gonzalez, 723 F.Supp. 690 (S.D.Fla.1988), affirmed, 886 F.2d 1323 (11th Cir.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Acosta v. Richter
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 155 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
DeJesus v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
green
1 sentence2007Such a result is consistent with a long line of cases dating back to deJesus v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 281 So.2d 198 (Fla.1973). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Gracey v. Eaker
green
1 sentence2004Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Rowell v. Holt
green
1 sentence2004Further, following Rowell, 850 So.2d at 478 , we conclude that Gracey controls the instant case because there is no legally significant distinction between the "foreseeability and gravity of the emotional injury involved" in the instant case and the "foreseeability and gravity of the emotional injury involved" in Gracey . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Roper v. Roper
green
1 sentence1996Roper, 336 So.2d at 657 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Carson v. Jackson
green
1 sentence1992I concede that two other cases which have considered this confidentiality waiver have (apparently) [2] not perceived the waiver to be this limited, Carson v. Jackson, 466 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); E.H. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 443 So.2d 1083, 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), but there is no suggestion this interpretation was directly raised in those cases. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Hamill v. Bower
green
1 sentence1987In determining whether good cause exists, the court shall give primary consideration to the best interests of the adoptee, but shall also give due consideration to the interests of the adoptive and natural parents... . [2] Id. [3] Fla.R.Crm.P. 3.830. [4] See Fla.R.App.P. 9.100(f). [5] Section 61.1302, et seq. [6] Subsections (a) through (c) of § 63.162(4) provide for disclosure when authorized by an individual who is protected by the confidentiality requirement. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.