9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Boeing Company v. Sierracin Corporationgreen1 sentence2026See 108 Wn.2d at 48 (“The act merely displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary and other law regarding civil liability for misappropriation. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Sullivangreen1 sentence1987Ed. 2d 333 , 100 S. Ct. 1708, 1721 (1980): The dangers of infringing the defendants' privilege against self-incrimination and their right to maintain the confidentiality of the defense strategy foreclose the type of detailed inquiry necessary to establish a knowing and intelligent waiver. *365 See also United States v. Sutton, 794 F.2d 1415, 1421 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Carrigan, 543 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir. 1976) ("It would be a rare defendant who could intelligently decide whether his interests will be properly served by counsel who also represents another defendant''); United Stat | 1 | 1 |
United States v. William John Sutton, United States of America v. Freddie Goldbaum Ortiz, United States of America v. Valentine Frank Proittegreen1 sentence1987Ed. 2d 333 , 100 S. Ct. 1708, 1721 (1980): The dangers of infringing the defendants' privilege against self-incrimination and their right to maintain the confidentiality of the defense strategy foreclose the type of detailed inquiry necessary to establish a knowing and intelligent waiver. *365 See also United States v. Sutton, 794 F.2d 1415, 1421 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Carrigan, 543 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir. 1976) ("It would be a rare defendant who could intelligently decide whether his interests will be properly served by counsel who also represents another defendant''); United Stat | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Richard Patrick Carrigan and Robert Edward Whitegreen1 sentence1987Ed. 2d 333 , 100 S. Ct. 1708, 1721 (1980): The dangers of infringing the defendants' privilege against self-incrimination and their right to maintain the confidentiality of the defense strategy foreclose the type of detailed inquiry necessary to establish a knowing and intelligent waiver. *365 See also United States v. Sutton, 794 F.2d 1415, 1421 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Carrigan, 543 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir. 1976) ("It would be a rare defendant who could intelligently decide whether his interests will be properly served by counsel who also represents another defendant''); United Stat | 1 | 1 |
Cuyler v. Sullivangreen1 sentence1987Ed. 2d 333 , 100 S. Ct. 1708, 1721 (1980): The dangers of infringing the defendants' privilege against self-incrimination and their right to maintain the confidentiality of the defense strategy foreclose the type of detailed inquiry necessary to establish a knowing and intelligent waiver. *365 See also United States v. Sutton, 794 F.2d 1415, 1421 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Carrigan, 543 F.2d 1053, 1058 (2d Cir. 1976) ("It would be a rare defendant who could intelligently decide whether his interests will be properly served by counsel who also represents another defendant''); United Stat | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Luna v. Household Finance Corp. III
green
2 sentences2007Id. at 1180-82 . 2007Id. at 1180-82 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Eugster
green
1 sentence2021“The confidentiality rule, for example, applies not only to matters communicated in confidence by the client but also to all information relating to the representation, whatever its source.” Id. cmt. 3. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
McKee v. AT&T Corp.
green
1 sentence2015Moreover, in Zuver, the court struck the unconscionable provisions rather than finding the entire agreement invalid. 153 Wn.2d at 322. ¶32 McKee involved a consumer dispute, and the court found the policy of confidentiality to be in direct conflict with public policy, a policy particularly important when dealing with consumers. 164 Wn.2d at 398-99 . ¶33 Here, the confidentiality clause is not so one-sided because it provides for a release of confidentiality when the parties otherwise agree. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Skamania County v. Columbia River Gorge Commission
green
2 sentences2012Skamania County v. Columbia River Gorge Comm’n, 144 Wn.2d 30, 42-43 , 26 P.3d 241 (2001). ¶23 Read in the context of other § 5331 provisions, the text of 49 U.S.C. § 5331 (d)(7), requiring the secretary to adopt procedures that “provide for the confidentiality of test results,” is reasonable only if read to refer to adoption of regulations protecting the confidentiality of drug and alcohol test results. 2012Skamania Cnty. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 144 Wash.2d 30, 42-43 , 26 P.3d 241 (2001). ¶ 23 Read in the context of other § 5331 provisions, the text of 49 U.S.C. § 5331 (d)(7), requiring the Secretary to adopt procedures that "provide for the confidentiality of test results," is reasonable only if read to refer to adoption of regulations protecting the confidentiality of drug and alcohol test results. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
SKAMANIA CTY. v. Columbia River Gorge Com'n
green
2 sentences2012Skamania County v. Columbia River Gorge Comm’n, 144 Wn.2d 30, 42-43 , 26 P.3d 241 (2001). ¶23 Read in the context of other § 5331 provisions, the text of 49 U.S.C. § 5331 (d)(7), requiring the secretary to adopt procedures that “provide for the confidentiality of test results,” is reasonable only if read to refer to adoption of regulations protecting the confidentiality of drug and alcohol test results. 2012Skamania Cnty. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 144 Wash.2d 30, 42-43 , 26 P.3d 241 (2001). ¶ 23 Read in the context of other § 5331 provisions, the text of 49 U.S.C. § 5331 (d)(7), requiring the Secretary to adopt procedures that "provide for the confidentiality of test results," is reasonable only if read to refer to adoption of regulations protecting the confidentiality of drug and alcohol test results. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Post
green
1 sentence1994Tegland, Wash. Prac., Evidence § 185, at 80 n.5 (1989), and indeed to any evidentiary privilege, see Post, 118 Wn.2d at 612 . 9 The consent form signed by Mrs. B. makes this clear: it explains only that the school psychologist will administer several education tests, and it further explains that the psychological assessment will be used by the MDT team "to develop an educational program for your child”. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Owen v. Mann
green
2 sentences1988(Citations omitted.) Owen v. Mann, 105 Ill. 2d at 535 (quoting People ex rel. 1988(Citations omitted.) Owen v. Mann, 105 Ill.2d at 535 (quoting People ex rel. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.