Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pala v. Loubsergreen2 sentences2014Id. 2013Pala v. Loubser, 943 N.E.2d 400, 407 (Ind.Ct.App.2011), trans. denied. | 2 | 5 |
Pettit v. Pettitgreen1 sentence2020Id. [7] In Pettit v. Pettit, the Indiana Supreme Court held that “contempt is always available to assist in the enforcement of child support, at least in respect of unemancipated children, including orders to pay accrued arrearages and money judgments against delinquent parents for past due amounts.” 626 N.E.2d 444, 447 (Ind. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
C.B. v. B.W.green1 sentence2014By allowing the appellant to prevail upon a showing of only prima facie error, we avoid the improper burden of having to act as advocate for the absent appellee.” C.B. v. B.W., 985 N.E.2d 340, 344 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013) (citation omitted), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Ponziano Construction Services, Inc. v. Quadri Enterprises, LLCgreen1 sentence2013By allowing the appellant to prevail upon a showing simply of prima facie error, we avoid the improper burden of having to act as advocate for the absent appellee.” Id. at 875-76 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vukovich v. Coleman
green
2 sentences2012Id. 2011By allowing the appellant to prevail upon a showing simply of prima facie error, [the Court] avoid[s] the improper burden of having to act as advocate for the absent appellee." Vukovich v. Coleman, 789 N.E.2d 520 , 524 n. 4 (Ind.Ct.App.2003). . | 3 | 2011–2012 |
Carter v. Grace Whitney Properties
green
2 sentences2020Id. [7] In Pettit v. Pettit, the Indiana Supreme Court held that “contempt is always available to assist in the enforcement of child support, at least in respect of unemancipated children, including orders to pay accrued arrearages and money judgments against delinquent parents for past due amounts.” 626 N.E.2d 444, 447 (Ind. 1993). 2017Id. [7] We review the denial of a motion to correct error for an abuse of discretion. | 2 | 2017–2020 |
Gardner v. State
green
1 sentence2005We also held that "by requiring the appellant to show some error, we ensure that the court, not the parties decides the law." Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |