Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sullivan v. Louisianagreen2 sentences2021See Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 , 113 S. Ct. 20785 2081, 124 L.Ed. 2d 182 ( 1993); State v. Revish, 15- 0470, 15- 0471, p. 10 ( La. 2021See Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 , 113 S. Ct. 20785 2081, 124 L.Ed. 2d 182 ( 1993); State v. Revish, 15- 0470, 15- 0471, p. 10 ( La. | 2 | 5 |
State v. Eskanogreen2 sentences2025Id. (“[T]he appropriate standard for determining harmless error is whether the guilty verdict was surely unattributable to the jury charge error.”) The guilty verdict was certainly supported by the evidence presented at trial. 2025Id. (“[T]he appropriate standard for determining harmless error is whether the guilty verdict was surely unattributable to the jury charge error.”) The guilty verdict was certainly supported by the evidence presented at trial. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Guillorygreen1 sentence2009See State v. Guillory, 2000-00386 (La.App. 3d Cir.11/2/00), 773 So.2d 794 , writ denied, 2000-3334 (La.11/9/01), 801 So.2d 362 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Guillorygreen1 sentence2009See State v. Guillory, 2000-00386 (La.App. 3d Cir.11/2/00), 773 So.2d 794 , writ denied, 2000-3334 (La.11/9/01), 801 So.2d 362 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cooper
green
2 sentences2009Cooper , 05-2070 at p. 9, 935 So.2d at 199-200 . 2008State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/03), 839 So.2d 1258 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), 872 So.2d 519 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 926 , 125 S.Ct. 1649 , 161 L.Ed.2d 487 (2005); State v. Cooper, 2005-2070 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/5/06), 935 So.2d 194 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/22/06), 942 So.2d 554 . | 2 | 2008–2009 |
State v. Flores
neutral
1 sentence2019App. 2 Cir. 4/10/19), 268 So.3d 1199 , 1207, reh'g denied (5/16/19) (unless there have been fundamentally erroneous misstatements of the essential elements of the charged offense, a Defendant may not raise the trial court’s failure to give a jury charge as error without objecting before the jury retires). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Morris
green
2 sentences2015State v. Morris, 2009-0422 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/11/09), 22 So.3d 1002, 1014 . 2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Josey v. Texas Department of Public Safety
neutral
1 sentence2008State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/03), 839 So.2d 1258 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), 872 So.2d 519 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 926 , 125 S.Ct. 1649 , 161 L.Ed.2d 487 (2005); State v. Cooper, 2005-2070 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/5/06), 935 So.2d 194 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/22/06), 942 So.2d 554 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Bertsch v. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
neutral
1 sentence2008State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/03), 839 So.2d 1258 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), 872 So.2d 519 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 926 , 125 S.Ct. 1649 , 161 L.Ed.2d 487 (2005); State v. Cooper, 2005-2070 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/5/06), 935 So.2d 194 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/22/06), 942 So.2d 554 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Gaddis v. Louisiana
neutral
1 sentence2008State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/03), 839 So.2d 1258 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), 872 So.2d 519 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 926 , 125 S.Ct. 1649 , 161 L.Ed.2d 487 (2005); State v. Cooper, 2005-2070 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/5/06), 935 So.2d 194 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/22/06), 942 So.2d 554 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Rose
green
1 sentence2008State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/03), 839 So.2d 1258 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), 872 So.2d 519 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 926 , 125 S.Ct. 1649 , 161 L.Ed.2d 487 (2005); State v. Cooper, 2005-2070 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/5/06), 935 So.2d 194 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/22/06), 942 So.2d 554 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Gaddis
neutral
1 sentence2008State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/03), 839 So.2d 1258 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), 872 So.2d 519 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 926 , 125 S.Ct. 1649 , 161 L.Ed.2d 487 (2005); State v. Cooper, 2005-2070 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/5/06), 935 So.2d 194 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/22/06), 942 So.2d 554 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State ex rel. Smith v. State
neutral
1 sentence2008State v. Gaddis, 36,661 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/03), 839 So.2d 1258 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), 872 So.2d 519 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 926 , 125 S.Ct. 1649 , 161 L.Ed.2d 487 (2005); State v. Cooper, 2005-2070 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/5/06), 935 So.2d 194 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/22/06), 942 So.2d 554 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Cage v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1991Specifically, he contends the trial court's definition of "reasonable doubt" included in the jury charge was in violation of the Sixth Amendment Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, citing the recent case of Cage v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 328 , 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990). *502 In Cage , the United States Supreme Court found that the jury charge defining reasonable doubt which used the phrases "grave uncertainty," "actual substantial doubt", and "moral certainty" could have led a reasonable juror to interpret the instruction "to allow a finding of guilt based on a degre 1991Specifically, he contends the trial court's definition of "reasonable doubt" included in the jury charge was in violation of the Sixth Amendment Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, citing the recent case of Cage v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 328 , 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990). *502 In Cage , the United States Supreme Court found that the jury charge defining reasonable doubt which used the phrases "grave uncertainty," "actual substantial doubt", and "moral certainty" could have led a reasonable juror to interpret the instruction "to allow a finding of guilt based on a degre | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Gonzales v. Xerox Corp.
green
1 sentence1980In any event, under Gonzales v. Xerox Corporation, 320 So.2d 163 (La.1975), we have the entire record before us for review and a searching examination of that record convinces us that the jury findings were correct. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.