Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People of Michigan v. Shae Lynn Mullinsgreen1 sentence2025See Mullins, 322 Mich App at 172 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bennett
green
2 sentences2015People v Bennett, 290 Mich App 465, 475 ; 802 NW2d 627 (2010). 2015People v Bennett, 290 Mich App 465, 475 ; 802 NW2d 627 (2010). | 4 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Albers
green
2 sentences2026Although issues not raised in the statement of questions presented are deemed abandoned on appeal, People v Albers, 258 Mich App 578, 584 ; 672 NW2d 336 (2003); MCR 7.212(C)(5), in this case, although worded as a due process claim in defendant’s statement of the questions presented, defendant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for a mistrial or for a curative jury instruction. 2026Although issues not raised in the statement of questions presented are deemed abandoned on appeal, People v Albers, 258 Mich App 578, 584 ; 672 NW2d 336 (2003); MCR 7.212(C)(5), in this case, although worded as a due process claim in defendant’s statement of the questions presented, defendant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for a mistrial or for a curative jury instruction. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
People v. Abraham
green
2 sentences2025“Jurors are presumed to follow their instructions, and instructions are presumed to cure most errors.” People v Abraham, 256 Mich App 265, 279 ; 662 NW2d 836 (2003). 2025“Jurors are presumed to follow their instructions, and instructions are presumed to cure most errors.” People v Abraham, 256 Mich App 265, 279 ; 662 NW2d 836 (2003). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Crawford
green
1 sentence2025Crawford, 458 Mich at 385 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People of Michigan v. Carl Rene Bruner II
green
2 sentences2020People v Bruner, 501 Mich 220, 228 ; 912 NW2d 514 (2018). 2020People v Bruner, 501 Mich 220, 228 ; 912 NW2d 514 (2018). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Dennis
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 571 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Sabin
green
2 sentences2020People v Sabin (On Second Remand), 242 Mich App 656, 658-659 ; 620 NW2d 19 (2000). “[A] failure to satisfy the plain-error test will not, without more, foreclose a defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. 2020People v Sabin (On Second Remand), 242 Mich App 656, 658-659 ; 620 NW2d 19 (2000). “[A] failure to satisfy the plain-error test will not, without more, foreclose a defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Stevens
green
1 sentence2016Stevens, 498 Mich at 177-178 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Duncan
green
2 sentences1980People v Duncan, 402 Mich 1, 16-17 ; 260 NW2d 58 (1977), People v Hall, 396 Mich 650 ; 242 NW2d 377 (1976). 1980People v Duncan, 402 Mich 1, 16-17 ; 260 NW2d 58 (1977), People v Hall, 396 Mich 650 ; 242 NW2d 377 (1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. Hall
green
2 sentences1980People v Duncan, 402 Mich 1, 16-17 ; 260 NW2d 58 (1977), People v Hall, 396 Mich 650 ; 242 NW2d 377 (1976). 1980People v Duncan, 402 Mich 1, 16-17 ; 260 NW2d 58 (1977), People v Hall, 396 Mich 650 ; 242 NW2d 377 (1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.