Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williamsongreen2 sentences2026Curative instruction Defendant argues, without a curative instruction, the jury “could freely speculate regarding the seriousness of [Defendant’s] prior federal conviction(s) and the length of his prior federal prison sentence[.]” However, our Supreme Court has held “[a] trial court does not err by failing to give a curative jury instruction when, as here, it is not requested by the defense.” State v. Williamson, 333 N.C. at 139 , 423 S.E.2d at 772 (citing State v. Locklear, 322 N.C. 349, 359 , 368 S.E.2d 377, 383 (1988)). 2026Curative instruction Defendant argues, without a curative instruction, the jury “could freely speculate regarding the seriousness of [Defendant’s] prior federal conviction(s) and the length of his prior federal prison sentence[.]” However, our Supreme Court has held “[a] trial court does not err by failing to give a curative jury instruction when, as here, it is not requested by the defense.” State v. Williamson, 333 N.C. at 139 , 423 S.E.2d at 772 (citing State v. Locklear, 322 N.C. 349, 359 , 368 S.E.2d 377, 383 (1988)). | 5 | 7 |
State v. Lockleargreen2 sentences2026Curative instruction Defendant argues, without a curative instruction, the jury “could freely speculate regarding the seriousness of [Defendant’s] prior federal conviction(s) and the length of his prior federal prison sentence[.]” However, our Supreme Court has held “[a] trial court does not err by failing to give a curative jury instruction when, as here, it is not requested by the defense.” State v. Williamson, 333 N.C. at 139 , 423 S.E.2d at 772 (citing State v. Locklear, 322 N.C. 349, 359 , 368 S.E.2d 377, 383 (1988)). 2026Curative instruction Defendant argues, without a curative instruction, the jury “could freely speculate regarding the seriousness of [Defendant’s] prior federal conviction(s) and the length of his prior federal prison sentence[.]” However, our Supreme Court has held “[a] trial court does not err by failing to give a curative jury instruction when, as here, it is not requested by the defense.” State v. Williamson, 333 N.C. at 139 , 423 S.E.2d at 772 (citing State v. Locklear, 322 N.C. 349, 359 , 368 S.E.2d 377, 383 (1988)). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2023Nevertheless, “it is not error for the trial court to fail to give a curative jury instruction after sustaining an objection, when defendant does not request such an instruction.” State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1, 24 , 510 S.E.2d 626, 642 (1999). 2023Nevertheless, “it is not error for the trial court to fail to give a curative jury instruction after sustaining an objection, when defendant does not request such an instruction.” State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1, 24 , 510 S.E.2d 626, 642 (1999). | 2 | 4 |
State v. Norwoodgreen2 sentences2010Moreover, “a trial court does not commit reversible error when it fails to give a curative jury instruction absent a request by defendant.” State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1, 24 , 510 S.E.2d 626, 641 (1999) (citing State v. Norwood, 344 N.C. 511, 537 , 476 S.E.2d 349, 361 (1996); State v. Rowsey, 343 N.C. 603, 628 , 472 S.E.2d 903, 916 (1996)). 2010Moreover, “a trial court does not commit reversible error when it fails to give a curative jury instruction absent a request by defendant.” State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1, 24 , 510 S.E.2d 626, 641 (1999) (citing State v. Norwood, 344 N.C. 511, 537 , 476 S.E.2d 349, 361 (1996); State v. Rowsey, 343 N.C. 603, 628 , 472 S.E.2d 903, 916 (1996)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Gordongreen2 sentences2023General instructions given at the outset of a trial may be “sufficient to cure any prejudicial effect suffered by [a] defendant regarding evidence to which an objection was raised and sustained.” State v. Gordon, 248 N.C. App. 403, 412 , 789 S.E.2d 659, 666 (2016). 2023General instructions given at the outset of a trial may be “sufficient to cure any prejudicial effect suffered by [a] defendant regarding evidence to which an objection was raised and sustained.” State v. Gordon, 248 N.C. App. 403, 412 , 789 S.E.2d 659, 666 (2016). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Huntergreen2 sentences2016We reject this argument because the North Carolina Supreme Court and this Court have held "it is not error for the trial court to fail to give a curative jury instruction after sustaining an objection, when defendant does not request such an instruction." State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1 , 24, 510 S.E.2d 626 , 642, cert. denied, 528 U.S. 880 , 120 S.Ct. 193 , 145 L.Ed.2d 162 (1999) ; see also State v. Hunter, 208 N.C.App. 506 , 517, 703 S.E.2d 776 , 784 (2010) ; State v. Williamson, 333 N.C. 128 , 423 S.E.2d 766 (1992). 2016We reject this argument because the North Carolina Supreme Court and this Court have held "it is not error for the trial court to fail to give a curative jury instruction after sustaining an objection, when defendant does not request such an instruction." State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1 , 24, 510 S.E.2d 626 , 642, cert. denied, 528 U.S. 880 , 120 S.Ct. 193 , 145 L.Ed.2d 162 (1999) ; see also State v. Hunter, 208 N.C.App. 506 , 517, 703 S.E.2d 776 , 784 (2010) ; State v. Williamson, 333 N.C. 128 , 423 S.E.2d 766 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rowseygreen2 sentences2010Moreover, “a trial court does not commit reversible error when it fails to give a curative jury instruction absent a request by defendant.” State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1, 24 , 510 S.E.2d 626, 641 (1999) (citing State v. Norwood, 344 N.C. 511, 537 , 476 S.E.2d 349, 361 (1996); State v. Rowsey, 343 N.C. 603, 628 , 472 S.E.2d 903, 916 (1996)). 2010Moreover, “a trial court does not commit reversible error when it fails to give a curative jury instruction absent a request by defendant.” State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1, 24 , 510 S.E.2d 626, 641 (1999) (citing State v. Norwood, 344 N.C. 511, 537 , 476 S.E.2d 349, 361 (1996); State v. Rowsey, 343 N.C. 603, 628 , 472 S.E.2d 903, 916 (1996)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bartongreen2 sentences2005Our Supreme Court has held that, where a trial court sustains an objection but a defendant fails to move to strike that which was objectionable and fails to request a curative instruction, “[t]he trial court [has taken] sufficient action by sustaining the defendant’s objection and was not required either to strike the testimony or to give a curative jury instruction.” State v. Barton, 335 N.C. 696, 709-10 , 441 S.E.2d 295, 302 (1994). 2005Our Supreme Court has held that, where a trial court sustains an objection but a defendant fails to move to strike that which was objectionable and fails to request a curative instruction, “[t]he trial court [has taken] sufficient action by sustaining the defendant’s objection and was not required either to strike the testimony or to give a curative jury instruction.” State v. Barton, 335 N.C. 696, 709-10 , 441 S.E.2d 295, 302 (1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. North Carolina
green
1 sentence2016We reject this argument because the North Carolina Supreme Court and this Court have held "it is not error for the trial court to fail to give a curative jury instruction after sustaining an objection, when defendant does not request such an instruction." State v. Williams, 350 N.C. 1 , 24, 510 S.E.2d 626 , 642, cert. denied, 528 U.S. 880 , 120 S.Ct. 193 , 145 L.Ed.2d 162 (1999) ; see also State v. Hunter, 208 N.C.App. 506 , 517, 703 S.E.2d 776 , 784 (2010) ; State v. Williamson, 333 N.C. 128 , 423 S.E.2d 766 (1992). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Lorenz v. Martin Marietta Corp.
green
1 sentence1999State v. Norwood, 344 N.C. 511, 537 , 476 S.E.2d 349, 361 (1996), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 137 L. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.