Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1908–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mohr v. Stategreen2 sentences2010This wise rule applies with equal force to the State’s witnesses and the appellant’s witnesses, including the appellant himself.”) 7 Mohr v. State, 584 So. 2d 426, 431 (Miss. 1991). 8 Gathright v. State, 380 So. 2d 1276, 1278 (Miss. 1980). 9 Id. 2010Mohr v. State, 584 So.2d 426, 431 (Miss.1991). 8 . | 2 | 2 |
Gathright v. Stategreen2 sentences2010This wise rule applies with equal force to the State’s witnesses and the appellant’s witnesses, including the appellant himself.”) 7 Mohr v. State, 584 So. 2d 426, 431 (Miss. 1991). 8 Gathright v. State, 380 So. 2d 1276, 1278 (Miss. 1980). 9 Id. 2010This wise rule applies with equal force to the State’s witnesses and the appellant’s witnesses, including the appellant himself.”) 7 Mohr v. State, 584 So. 2d 426, 431 (Miss. 1991). 8 Gathright v. State, 380 So. 2d 1276, 1278 (Miss. 1980). 9 Id. | 1 | 3 |
Cornell v. Coynegreen2 sentences1966United States v. Fisher, 2 Cranch 358, 386 , 2 L.Ed. 304 [313]; Cornell v. Coyne, 192 U.S. 418, 430 , 24 S.Ct. 383, 385, 386 , 48 L.Ed. 504 [509]; Strathearn S.S. 1966United States v. Fisher, 2 Cranch 358, 386 , 2 L.Ed. 304 [313]; Cornell v. Coyne, 192 U.S. 418, 430 , 24 S.Ct. 383, 385, 386 , 48 L.Ed. 504 [509]; Strathearn S.S. | 1 | 1 |
Hampton v. Stategreen2 sentences1966In Hampton v. State, 88 Miss. 257, 259 , 40 So. 545, 546 (1906), the Court, speaking through Judge Calhoon, at the conclusion of the opinion said as follows: All must be tried on facts, and not on abuse. 1966In Hampton v. State, 88 Miss. 257, 259 , 40 So. 545, 546 (1906), the Court, speaking through Judge Calhoon, at the conclusion of the opinion said as follows: All must be tried on facts, and not on abuse. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Moore v. Molpus
green
2 sentences2011In deciding this issue, I am reminded of the wise analysis of Justice Robertson, writing for the Court in Moore, 578 So.2d at 638 : Constitutional stare decisis bears a separate dimension. 2011In deciding this issue, I am reminded of the wise analysis of Justice Robertson, writing for the Court in Moore, 578 So.2d at 638 : Constitutional stare decisis bears a separate dimension. | 2 | 2010–2011 |
Shackelford v. New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad
neutral
2 sentences1991Shackleford v. N.O., J. & Great Northern Ry., 37 Miss. 202 . 1908Shackleford v. N. O., J. & Great Northern Ry., 37 Miss. 202 . | 2 | 1908–1991 |
Green v. State
green
1 sentence2018Furthermore, "the Weathersby [r]ule is not the proper subject of an instruction to the jury." Green v. State , 631 So.2d 167 , 175 (Miss. 1994). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Lee v. State
green
2 sentences1993This is a wise rule of law because, as we stated in Lee v. State, 244 Miss. 813 , 146 So.2d 736 (Miss. 1962), the ... criminal intent of a defendant, dwelling in his mind, invisible to the outward sight, can never be proven by direct testimony of a third person, (except when verbally expressed or admitted), and it need not be, because a person is presumed to intend that which he does, or which is the natural and necessary consequence of his act. [Citations omitted] Moreover, the court and the jury are not bound by the evidence of the accused as to what his intention was in the doing of a parti 1993This is a wise rule of law because, as we stated in Lee v. State, 244 Miss. 813 , 146 So.2d 736 (Miss. 1962), the ... criminal intent of a defendant, dwelling in his mind, invisible to the outward sight, can never be proven by direct testimony of a third person, (except when verbally expressed or admitted), and it need not be, because a person is presumed to intend that which he does, or which is the natural and necessary consequence of his act. [Citations omitted] Moreover, the court and the jury are not bound by the evidence of the accused as to what his intention was in the doing of a parti | 1 | 1993–1993 |
United States v. Fisher
green
2 sentences1966United States v. Fisher, 2 Cranch 358, 386 , 2 L.Ed. 304 [313]; Cornell v. Coyne, 192 U.S. 418, 430 , 24 S.Ct. 383, 385, 386 , 48 L.Ed. 504 [509]; Strathearn S.S. 1966United States v. Fisher, 2 Cranch 358, 386 , 2 L.Ed. 304 [313]; Cornell v. Coyne, 192 U.S. 418, 430 , 24 S.Ct. 383, 385, 386 , 48 L.Ed. 504 [509]; Strathearn S.S. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
C. W. Cornell v. F. E. Coyne
green
1 sentence1966United States v. Fisher, 2 Cranch 358, 386 , 2 L.Ed. 304 [313]; Cornell v. Coyne, 192 U.S. 418, 430 , 24 S.Ct. 383, 385, 386 , 48 L.Ed. 504 [509]; Strathearn S.S. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Hill v. State
neutral
1 sentence1966In Hill v. State, 72 Miss. 527, 534 , 17 So. 375 , 377 (1895), we stated: "The fair way is the safe way, and the safe way is the best way in every criminal prosecution." This wise rule has application in all criminal cases. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Echols v. State
neutral
2 sentences1945Therefore, if you believe from the evidence in this case or if there is any reasonable doubt arising from the evidence or from the want of evidence that Lloyd McMillan armed himself for his own protection only and went on a peaceful mission to the home of Mose Lewis, the deceased, for the purpose of making inquiry about his wife, then you are instructed that *184 he had a right to go to the home of deceased and to carry a deadly weapon with him on said mission. ’ ’ An examination of the case of Echols v. State, 99 Miss. 683 , 55 So. 485 , reveals that this, instruction was formulated from disc 1945Therefore, if you believe from the evidence in this case or if there is any reasonable doubt arising from the evidence or from the want of evidence that Lloyd McMillan armed himself for his own protection only and went on a peaceful mission to the home of Mose Lewis, the deceased, for the purpose of making inquiry about his wife, then you are instructed that *184 he had a right to go to the home of deceased and to carry a deadly weapon with him on said mission. ’ ’ An examination of the case of Echols v. State, 99 Miss. 683 , 55 So. 485 , reveals that this, instruction was formulated from disc | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Scott v. State
neutral
2 sentences1945Therefore, if you believe from the evidence in this case or if there is any reasonable doubt arising from the evidence or from the want of evidence that Lloyd McMillan armed himself for his own protection only and went on a peaceful mission to the home of Mose Lewis, the deceased, for the purpose of making inquiry about his wife, then you are instructed that *184 he had a right to go to the home of deceased and to carry a deadly weapon with him on said mission. ’ ’ An examination of the case of Echols v. State, 99 Miss. 683 , 55 So. 485 , reveals that this, instruction was formulated from disc 1945Therefore, if you believe from the evidence in this case or if there is any reasonable doubt arising from the evidence or from the want of evidence that Lloyd McMillan armed himself for his own protection only and went on a peaceful mission to the home of Mose Lewis, the deceased, for the purpose of making inquiry about his wife, then you are instructed that *184 he had a right to go to the home of deceased and to carry a deadly weapon with him on said mission. ’ ’ An examination of the case of Echols v. State, 99 Miss. 683 , 55 So. 485 , reveals that this, instruction was formulated from disc | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.