91 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Day v. Quartermangreen2 sentences2025C.Cr.P. art. 930.2; see also Day v. Quarterman, 566 F.3d 527, 538 (5th Cir. 2009) (“[T]o prevail on an ineffective assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to call a 8 witness, the petitioner must name the witness, demonstrate that the witness was available to testify and would have done so, set out the content of the witness’s proposed testimony, and show that the testimony would have been favorable to a particular defense.”). 2021P. art. 930.2; see also Day v. Quarterman, 566 F.3d 527, 538 (5th Cir. 2009) (“[T]o prevail on an ineffective assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to call a witness, the petitioner must name the witness, demonstrate that the witness was available to testify and would have done so, set out the content of the witness’s proposed testimony, and show that the testimony would have been favorable to a particular defense. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Hongogreen2 sentences2001Because the erroneous instruction at issue may be an irrelevancy and because a reviewing court can make this determination, the error is not structural such as that in Sullivan , but rather a trial error which may or may not have prejudiced defendant and thus is subject to harmless error analysis, or in the case of an ineffective assistance claim, an analysis of whether defendant was prejudiced by the error. _[^96-2060 at pp. 5-6, 706 So.2d at 421-422 (footnote omitted). 2001The State v. Hongo decision settled the issue, in holding: Because the erroneous instruction at issue may be an irrelevancy and because a reviewing court can make this determination, the error is not structural such as that in Sullivan , but rather a trial error which may or may not have prejudiced defendant and thus is subject to harmless error analysis, or in the case of an ineffective assistance claim, an analysis of whether defendant was prejudiced by the error. [Footnote omitted.] State v. Hongo , 96-2060 at p. 5, 706 So.2d at 422 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Pendeltongreen2 sentences2015See State v. Pendelton, 96-367, p. 30 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97), 696 So.2d 144, 159 , writ denied, 97-1714 (La.12/19/97), 706 So.2d 450 ; State v. Meaux, 13-715 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/26/14) , 131 So.3d 1136 ; State v. Hayes, 97-1526 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/15/98) , 712 So.2d 1019, 1022 , writ denied, 99-2136 (La.6/16/00), 764 So.2d 955 . 2001State v. Pendelton, 96-367, p. 30 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97), 696 So.2d 144, 159 , writ denied, 97-1714 (La.12/19/97), 706 So.2d 450 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Pendeltongreen2 sentences2015See State v. Pendelton, 96-367, p. 30 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97), 696 So.2d 144, 159 , writ denied, 97-1714 (La.12/19/97), 706 So.2d 450 ; State v. Meaux, 13-715 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/26/14) , 131 So.3d 1136 ; State v. Hayes, 97-1526 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/15/98) , 712 So.2d 1019, 1022 , writ denied, 99-2136 (La.6/16/00), 764 So.2d 955 . 2001State v. Pendelton, 96-367, p. 30 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97), 696 So.2d 144, 159 , writ denied, 97-1714 (La.12/19/97), 706 So.2d 450 . | 1 | 2 |
Ledford v. New Orleans Saintsgreen1 sentence2019See State v. Thomas, 08–2912, (La. 10/16/09), 19 So.3d 466 (claims of “ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are not cognizable on collateral review pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 and State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
Theodore Abbott Jones v. Gary Stotts, Mike Nelson, and Attorney General of Kansasgreen1 sentence2016Cf. Jones v. Stotts, 59 F.3d 143, 146 (10th Cir. 1995) (“A defendant may prevail on an ineffective assistance claim relating to trial strategy . . . if he can show counsel’s strategy decisions would not be considered sound.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Browngreen1 sentence2016See State v. Brown, 48,257 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/13), 135 So.3d 718 , writ denied, 2013-2550 (La.4/4/14), 135 So.3d 640 ; State v. Taylor, 44,367 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/09), 20 So.3d 1157 ; State v. Howard, 09-928 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/25/10), 37 So.3d 1099 ; State v. Lee, 2000-0183 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/16/01), 788 So.2d 452 , writ denied, 788 So.2d 442 (La.2001). | ¡An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.' La. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2016See State v. Brown, 48,257 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/13), 135 So.3d 718 , writ denied, 2013-2550 (La.4/4/14), 135 So.3d 640 ; State v. Taylor, 44,367 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/09), 20 So.3d 1157 ; State v. Howard, 09-928 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/25/10), 37 So.3d 1099 ; State v. Lee, 2000-0183 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/16/01), 788 So.2d 452 , writ denied, 788 So.2d 442 (La.2001). | ¡An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.' La. | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Jamesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. LeBeaugreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. LeBeaugreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Simmonsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2024The burden of proof for an ineffective assistance claim is set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. 2024The burden of proof for an ineffective assistance claim is set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. | 35 | 1992–2024 |
State Ex Rel. Ab
green
2 sentences2019Id. 2019Id. | 18 | 2011–2019 |
State v. Howard
green
2 sentences2013State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), 751 So.2d 783, 802 . 2013State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), 751 So.2d 783, 802 . | 6 | 2006–2013 |
State v. Hayes
green
2 sentences2015See State v. Pendelton, 96-367, p. 30 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97), 696 So.2d 144, 159 , writ denied, 97-1714 (La.12/19/97), 706 So.2d 450 ; State v. Meaux, 13-715 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/26/14) , 131 So.3d 1136 ; State v. Hayes, 97-1526 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/15/98) , 712 So.2d 1019, 1022 , writ denied, 99-2136 (La.6/16/00), 764 So.2d 955 . 2001State v. Hayes, 97-1526 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/15/98) ; 712 So.2d 1019, 1022 . | 4 | 1999–2015 |
State v. Judge
neutral
2 sentences2019This court held in State v. Judge , 99-1109 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/00) [,] 758 So.2d 313 , [ writ denied , 01-1094 (La. 3/28/02), 812 So.2d 641 ,] that there could be a basis for an ineffective assistance claim if a defendant can show a reasonable probability that, had counsel filed or made a motion to reconsider the sentence, the sentence would have been different. 2019This court held in State v. Judge , 99-1109 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/00) [,] 758 So.2d 313 , [ writ denied , 01-1094 (La. 3/28/02), 812 So.2d 641 ,] that there could be a basis for an ineffective assistance claim if a defendant can show a reasonable probability that, had counsel filed or made a motion to reconsider the sentence, the sentence would have been different. | 3 | 2002–2019 |
State v. Reeves
green
2 sentences2024State v. Reeves, 18-270 (La. 10/15/18), 254 So. 3d 665 . 2022To prevail on an ineffective assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to call a witness, the petitioner must name the witness, demonstrate that the witness was available to testify and would have done so, set out the content of the witness’s proposed testimony, and show that the testimony would have been favorable to a particular defense.” See State v. Reeves, 18-270 (La. 10/15/18), 254 So.3d 665, 672 . | 2 | 2022–2024 |
State v. Kinsel
green
2 sentences2019This court held in State v. Judge , 99-1109 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/00) [,] 758 So.2d 313 , [ writ denied , 01-1094 (La. 3/28/02), 812 So.2d 641 ,] that there could be a basis for an ineffective assistance claim if a defendant can show a reasonable probability that, had counsel filed or made a motion to reconsider the sentence, the sentence would have been different. 2019This court held in State v. Judge , 99-1109 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/00) [,] 758 So.2d 313 , [ writ denied , 01-1094 (La. 3/28/02), 812 So.2d 641 ,] that there could be a basis for an ineffective assistance claim if a defendant can show a reasonable probability that, had counsel filed or made a motion to reconsider the sentence, the sentence would have been different. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Seiss
green
2 sentences2012State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Haywood, 516 So.2d 196 (La.App. 4th Cir.1987); State v. Kelly, 92-2446 (La. 2011State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Haywood, 516 So.2d 196 (La.App. 4th Cir.1987); State v. Kelly, 92-2446 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/8/94) , 639 So.2d 888 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
State v. Haywood
green
2 sentences2012State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Haywood, 516 So.2d 196 (La.App. 4th Cir.1987); State v. Kelly, 92-2446 (La. 2011State v. Seiss, 428 So.2d 444 (La.1983); State v. Haywood, 516 So.2d 196 (La.App. 4th Cir.1987); State v. Kelly, 92-2446 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/8/94) , 639 So.2d 888 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
Adams v. Frost
neutral
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Smith
neutral
1 sentence2024App. 2 Cir. 11/19/14), 152 So. 3d 218 , writ denied, 14-2695 (La. 10/23/15), 179 So. 3d 597 ; Davis, supra. The burden of proof for an ineffective assistance claim is set forth in Strickland, supra. In support of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Parks refers to testimony by Drew, his stepfather, and Free, his girlfriend, regarding his alleged past head trauma and resulting confusion of the plea and sentencing process. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In re Appeal of the Disciplinary Board Nos. 15-PDB-053 and 15-PDB-054
neutral
1 sentence2024App. 2 Cir. 11/19/14), 152 So. 3d 218 , writ denied, 14-2695 (La. 10/23/15), 179 So. 3d 597 ; Davis, supra. The burden of proof for an ineffective assistance claim is set forth in Strickland, supra. In support of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Parks refers to testimony by Drew, his stepfather, and Free, his girlfriend, regarding his alleged past head trauma and resulting confusion of the plea and sentencing process. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Mansfield
green
1 sentence2023App. 2 Cir. 2/24/16), 190 So. 3d 322, 328 , “[I]n extraordinary circumstances, appellate courts have taken a third approach on appeal and remanded an ineffective assistance claim for an evidentiary hearing.” In State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Paulson
green
1 sentence2019App. 4 Cir. 9/30/15), 177 So.3d 360, 367 , this Court recognized the well-settled rule that “[g]enerally, ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claims are more properly raised in an application for post- conviction relief where the district court can conduct a full evidentiary hearing on the matter, if one is warranted.” In this case, however, because the defendant’s ineffective assistance claim concerns his sentencing, he will lack recourse in post- conviction proceedings. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Taylor
neutral
1 sentence2016See State v. Brown, 48,257 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/13), 135 So.3d 718 , writ denied, 2013-2550 (La.4/4/14), 135 So.3d 640 ; State v. Taylor, 44,367 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/09), 20 So.3d 1157 ; State v. Howard, 09-928 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/25/10), 37 So.3d 1099 ; State v. Lee, 2000-0183 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/16/01), 788 So.2d 452 , writ denied, 788 So.2d 442 (La.2001). | ¡An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.' La. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Howard
green
1 sentence2016See State v. Brown, 48,257 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/13), 135 So.3d 718 , writ denied, 2013-2550 (La.4/4/14), 135 So.3d 640 ; State v. Taylor, 44,367 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/09), 20 So.3d 1157 ; State v. Howard, 09-928 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/25/10), 37 So.3d 1099 ; State v. Lee, 2000-0183 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/16/01), 788 So.2d 452 , writ denied, 788 So.2d 442 (La.2001). | ¡An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.' La. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
STATE EX REL. JONES v. State
green
1 sentence2016See State v. Brown, 48,257 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/13), 135 So.3d 718 , writ denied, 2013-2550 (La.4/4/14), 135 So.3d 640 ; State v. Taylor, 44,367 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/09), 20 So.3d 1157 ; State v. Howard, 09-928 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/25/10), 37 So.3d 1099 ; State v. Lee, 2000-0183 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/16/01), 788 So.2d 452 , writ denied, 788 So.2d 442 (La.2001). | ¡An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.' La. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Lee
green
1 sentence2016See State v. Brown, 48,257 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/13), 135 So.3d 718 , writ denied, 2013-2550 (La.4/4/14), 135 So.3d 640 ; State v. Taylor, 44,367 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/09), 20 So.3d 1157 ; State v. Howard, 09-928 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/25/10), 37 So.3d 1099 ; State v. Lee, 2000-0183 (La.App. 1st Cir.2/16/01), 788 So.2d 452 , writ denied, 788 So.2d 442 (La.2001). | ¡An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.' La. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Hayes
green
1 sentence2015See State v. Pendelton, 96-367, p. 30 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97), 696 So.2d 144, 159 , writ denied, 97-1714 (La.12/19/97), 706 So.2d 450 ; State v. Meaux, 13-715 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/26/14) , 131 So.3d 1136 ; State v. Hayes, 97-1526 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/15/98) , 712 So.2d 1019, 1022 , writ denied, 99-2136 (La.6/16/00), 764 So.2d 955 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Padilla v. Kentucky
green
1 sentence2014Padilla, 130 S.Ct. at 1482 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Busby
green
1 sentence2012In State v. Busby, 94-1354 (La.App.3d Cir.4/5/95), 653 So.2d 140 , writ denied, 95-1157 (La.9/29/95), 660 So.2d 854 , the court of appeal rejected an ineffective assistance claim. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Busby
green
1 sentence2012In State v. Busby, 94-1354 (La.App.3d Cir.4/5/95), 653 So.2d 140 , writ denied, 95-1157 (La.9/29/95), 660 So.2d 854 , the court of appeal rejected an ineffective assistance claim. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
| State v. Kelly green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| State v. Watson neutral | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| State v. Mitchell green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| State v. Reichard green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| State v. Washington green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| State v. Clements neutral | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| State v. Texada neutral | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| State v. Peart green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| State v. Soler green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Hill v. Lockhart green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| State v. Brown green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.