Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1973–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lazell v. Stonegreen2 sentences2013A breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment requires an eviction, actual or constructive, brought about by the acts of the landlord, those acting for the landlord, or those acting with the landlord’s permission. 2616 S. Loop L.L.C. v. Health Source Home Care, Inc., 201 S.W.3d 349 , 359 n. 7 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (citing Lazell v. Stone, 123 S.W.3d 6 , 12 n. 1 (Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (“The elements of a breach of the warranty of quiet enjoyment are the same as the elements in a constructive eviction claim.”)). 2006Pipe & Tubing, Inc. , 856 S.W.2d 530, 539 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no writ); see also Lazell v. Stone , 123 S.W.3d 6 , 12 n.1 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) ( A The elements of a breach of the warranty of quiet enjoyment are the same as the elements in a constructive eviction claim. @ ). | 3 | 5 |
Holmes v. P.K. Pipe & Tubing, Inc.green2 sentences2006Pipe & Tubing, Inc., 856 S.W.2d 530, 539 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no writ); see also Lazell v. Stone, 123 S.W.3d 6 , 12 n. 1 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) ("The elements of a breach of the warranty of quiet enjoyment are the same as the elements in a constructive eviction claim.”). 2006Pipe & Tubing, Inc. , 856 S.W.2d 530, 539 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no writ); see also Lazell v. Stone , 123 S.W.3d 6 , 12 n.1 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) ( A The elements of a breach of the warranty of quiet enjoyment are the same as the elements in a constructive eviction claim. @ ). | 3 | 3 |
Goldman v. Alkekgreen2 sentences2024Lazell v. Stone, 123 S.W.3d 6 , 12 n.1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (citing Goldman v. Alkek, 850 S.W.2d 568 , 571-72 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg, 1993 no writ)). 2003See Goldman v. Alkek, 850 S.W.2d 568, 571-72 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi, 1993 no writ). | 1 | 2 |
Williamson v. Howardgreen1 sentence2025Westwood Motorcars, LLC v. Virtuolotry, LLC, 689 S.W.3d 879 , 882 (Tex. 2024). 7 Williamson v. Howard, 554 S.W.3d 59, 69 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2018, no pet.); Bagby 3015, LLC v. Bagby House, LLC, 674 S.W.3d 609 , 620–21 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2023, no pet.) (“The elements of a claim for breach of the warranty or covenant of quiet enjoyment are the same as the elements of a constructive-eviction claim[.]”). | 1 | 1 |
Sylvia Arredondo v. Village on the Lake, Ltd and Votl I GP, Inc.green1 sentence2025Arredondo, 681 S.W.3d at 866 (“Although the Village’s 9 warnings and notifications about the noise complaints upset Arredondo, this does not create a fact issue showing an intention or a material act by the landlord substantially interfering with her use of the property.”). | 1 | 1 |
Allen Chadwick Burbage v. W. Kirk Burbage and Burbage Funeral Homegreen1 sentence2024Westwood did not assert such a claim here. –11– No. 05-16-00268-CV, 2017 WL 2927825 , at *6 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 10, 2017, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (citing Burbage v. Burbage, 447 S.W.3d 249, 263 (Tex. 2014)). | 1 | 1 |
Ingram v. Fredgreen1 sentence1973Other courts have reached the desired re-suit simply and logically, as did the Court in Ingram v. Fred, 210 S.W. 298, 300 (Tex.Civ.App. — Fort Worth 1919, writ ref’d), by applying ordinary contract rules applicable to interdependent promises. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bagby 3015, LLC and Amir Ansari v. Bagby House, LLC
green
2 sentences2025Bagby 3015, LLC v. Bagby House, LLC, 674 S.W.3d 609 , 620 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2023, no pet.). 2025Westwood Motorcars, LLC v. Virtuolotry, LLC, 689 S.W.3d 879 , 882 (Tex. 2024). 7 Williamson v. Howard, 554 S.W.3d 59, 69 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2018, no pet.); Bagby 3015, LLC v. Bagby House, LLC, 674 S.W.3d 609 , 620–21 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2023, no pet.) (“The elements of a claim for breach of the warranty or covenant of quiet enjoyment are the same as the elements of a constructive-eviction claim[.]”). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Westwood Motorcars, LLC v. Virtuolotry, LLC and Richard Boyd
green
1 sentence2025Westwood Motorcars, LLC v. Virtuolotry, LLC, 689 S.W.3d 879 , 882 (Tex. 2024). 7 Williamson v. Howard, 554 S.W.3d 59, 69 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2018, no pet.); Bagby 3015, LLC v. Bagby House, LLC, 674 S.W.3d 609 , 620–21 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2023, no pet.) (“The elements of a claim for breach of the warranty or covenant of quiet enjoyment are the same as the elements of a constructive-eviction claim[.]”). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Steinberg v. Medical Equipment Rental Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024Rental Servs., Inc., 505 S.W.2d 692 , 696-97 (Tex. App.— Dallas 1974, no writ). 6 While a tenant does not have a constructive eviction claim if an actual eviction occurs, it may, nevertheless, have a wrongful eviction claim. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Briargrove Shopping Center Joint Venture v. Vilar, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024Id. at 329-38 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Gautam & Shweta Daftary D/B/A Preston Dental v. Prestonwood Market Square, LTD
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
2616 South Loop L.L.C. v. Health Source Home Care, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013A breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment requires an eviction, actual or constructive, brought about by the acts of the landlord, those acting for the landlord, or those acting with the landlord’s permission. 2616 S. Loop L.L.C. v. Health Source Home Care, Inc., 201 S.W.3d 349 , 359 n. 7 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (citing Lazell v. Stone, 123 S.W.3d 6 , 12 n. 1 (Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (“The elements of a breach of the warranty of quiet enjoyment are the same as the elements in a constructive eviction claim.”)). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Richker v. Georgandis
green
1 sentence1982We rely on Richker v. Georgandis, 323 S.W.2d 90 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1959, writ ref’d n.r.e.) for this decision. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.