Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reliant Energy, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texasgreen2 sentences2025Reliant Energy, 62 S.W.3d at 840 . 2025“A reviewing court must confine its search for a reasoned justification to the four corners of the order finally adopting the rule, and the agency must provide a reasoned justification for the rule as a whole, not clause by clause.” Lambright, 157 S.W.3d at 504 ; see Reliant Energy, 62 S.W.3d at 840 ; Arco, 876 S.W.2d at 491 . | 5 | 6 |
Railroad Commission of Texas v. Arco Oil & Gas Co.green2 sentences2025“A reviewing court must confine its search for a reasoned justification to the four corners of the order finally adopting the rule, and the agency must provide a reasoned justification for the rule as a whole, not clause by clause.” Lambright, 157 S.W.3d at 504 ; see Reliant Energy, 62 S.W.3d at 840 ; Arco, 876 S.W.2d at 491 . 2001See ARCO, 876 S.W.2d at 480 (citing Ron L. | 5 | 6 |
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas v. Texas Industrial Accident Boardgreen2 sentences2004See Reliant, 62 S.W.3d at 840 ; see also Methodist Hosps. v. Industrial Accident Bd., 798 S.W.2d 651, 659 (Tex.App.-Austin 1990, writ dism’d w.o.j.). 2004See Reliant , 62 S.W.3d at 840 ; see also Methodist Hosps. v. Industrial Accident Bd. , 798 S.W.2d 651, 659 (Tex. App.--Austin 1990, writ dism'd w.o.j.). | 3 | 3 |
Lambright v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Departmentgreen2 sentences2025Id. (stating that “[a] reviewing court must confine its search for a reasoned justification to the four corners of the order finally adopting the rule . . . .”). 2025“A reviewing court must confine its search for a reasoned justification to the four corners of the order finally adopting the rule, and the agency must provide a reasoned justification for the rule as a whole, not clause by clause.” Lambright, 157 S.W.3d at 504 ; see Reliant Energy, 62 S.W.3d at 840 ; Arco, 876 S.W.2d at 491 . | 1 | 4 |
Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities v. Public Utility Commissiongreen1 sentence2023Comm’n, 161 S.W.3d 706, 713 (Tex. App.—Austin 2005, no pet.) (“The question of substantial compliance is a question of law determined solely from the face of the adopting order.”); Lambright v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Dep’t, 157 S.W.3d 499, 504 (Tex. App.—Austin 2005, no pet.) (“A reviewing court must confine its search for a reasoned justification to the four corners of the order finally adopting the rule . . . .”); Office of Pub. 17 Util. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State, Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission of Texas
green
2 sentences2023Couns., 131 S.W.3d at 327 , (“Our review is limited to the face of the order finally adopting the rule.”). 2023Couns., 131 S.W.3d at 327 , (“Our review is limited to the face of the order finally adopting the rule.”). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.