rule rather exception in Texas

13 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1989–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United Statesgreen scotus · 2005 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015 2 sentences 2015See, e.g., Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696, 704 , 125 S. Ct. 2129 , 161 L. 2015See, e.g., Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696, 704 , 125 S. Ct. 2129 , 161 L.	3	3
Alcala v. Texas Webb Countygreen txsd · 2009 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015Alcala v. Texas Webb County, 625 F.Supp.2d 391, 397 (S.D. 2015Alcala v. Texas Webb County, 625 F.Supp. 2d 391, 397 (S.D.Tex. 2009); Gebhardt v. Gallardo, 891 S.W.2d at 330 .	3	3
United States v. Hastinggreen scotus · 1983 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 2 sentences 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in	2	2
Satterwhite v. Texasgreen scotus · 1988 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 2 sentences 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in	2	2
Delaware v. Van Arsdallgreen scotus · 1986 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 2 sentences 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in	2	2
In Re Gravesgreen texapp · 2007 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2008–2019 2 sentences 2019As to them, judicial notice instead of record evidence is the rule rather than the exception, and indisputability is not required to justify judicial notice.” In re Graves, 217 S.W.3d 744, 750 (Tex. App.— Waco 2007, orig. proceeding) (quoting 1 Steve Goode et al, TEXAS PRACTICE SERIES: GUIDE TO THE TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE § 201.2 (3d ed. 2002)). 2008As to them, judicial notice instead of record evidence is the rule rather than the exception, and indisputability is not required to justify judicial notice.” Graves, 217 S.W.3d at 750 (quoting GOODE § 201.2).	1	4
Willis v. Maverickgreen tex · 1988 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 2 sentences 1990See, e.g., Willis v. Maverick, 760 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.1988) (discovery rule applicable in legal malpractice action); Weaver v. Witt, 561 S.W.2d 792 (Tex.1977) (medical malpractice); Kelley v. Rinkle, 532 S.W.2d 947 (Tex.1976) (action for libel of credit reputation). 1990See, e.g., Willis v. Maverick, 760 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.1988) (discovery rule applicable in legal malpractice action); Weaver v. Witt, 561 S.W.2d 792 (Tex.1977) (medical malpractice); Kelley v. Rinkle, 532 S.W.2d 947 (Tex.1976) (action for libel of credit reputation).	1	1
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gaygreen tex · 1894 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 2 sentences 1990Texas & P. Ry. v. Gay, 86 Tex. 571, 576 , 26 S.W. 599, 614 (Tex.1894). 6 As a review of the cases cited by the court evidences, tolling of limitations to permit discovery is the rule rather than the exception. 1990Texas & P. Ry. v. Gay, 86 Tex. 571, 576 , 26 S.W. 599, 614 (Tex.1894). 6 As a review of the cases cited by the court evidences, tolling of limitations to permit discovery is the rule rather than the exception.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
Moore v. Illinois green scotus · 1977 2 sentences 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in	2	1989–1989
Chambers v. Maroney green scotus · 1970 2 sentences 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in	2	1989–1989
Rushen v. Spain green scotus · 1983 2 sentences 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in 1989See, e.g., Satterwhite, 486 U.S. at ___ , 108 S.Ct. at 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d at 284 (confession obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel); Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. at 684 , 106 S.Ct. at 1438 (failure to permit cross-examination); Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 118 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 455 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (denial of right to be present at trial); Hasting, 461 U.S. at 508-509 , 103 S.Ct. at 1980 (improper comment on defendant's failure to testify); Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220, 232 , 98 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977) (admission of witness identification obtained in	2	1989–1989
Gebhardt v. Gallardo green texapp · 1995 1 sentence 2015Alcala v. Texas Webb County, 625 F.Supp. 2d 391, 397 (S.D.Tex. 2009); Gebhardt v. Gallardo, 891 S.W.2d at 330 .	1	2015–2015
Kelley v. Rinkle green tex · 1976 2 sentences 1990See, e.g., Willis v. Maverick, 760 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.1988) (discovery rule applicable in legal malpractice action); Weaver v. Witt, 561 S.W.2d 792 (Tex.1977) (medical malpractice); Kelley v. Rinkle, 532 S.W.2d 947 (Tex.1976) (action for libel of credit reputation). 1990See, e.g., Willis v. Maverick, 760 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.1988) (discovery rule applicable in legal malpractice action); Weaver v. Witt, 561 S.W.2d 792 (Tex.1977) (medical malpractice); Kelley v. Rinkle, 532 S.W.2d 947 (Tex.1976) (action for libel of credit reputation).	1	1990–1990
Weaver v. Witt green tex · 1977 2 sentences 1990See, e.g., Willis v. Maverick, 760 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.1988) (discovery rule applicable in legal malpractice action); Weaver v. Witt, 561 S.W.2d 792 (Tex.1977) (medical malpractice); Kelley v. Rinkle, 532 S.W.2d 947 (Tex.1976) (action for libel of credit reputation). 1990See, e.g., Willis v. Maverick, 760 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.1988) (discovery rule applicable in legal malpractice action); Weaver v. Witt, 561 S.W.2d 792 (Tex.1977) (medical malpractice); Kelley v. Rinkle, 532 S.W.2d 947 (Tex.1976) (action for libel of credit reputation).	1	1990–1990

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Fam. Code § 153.001 (3) TX § Tex. Fam. Code § 153.501 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 44 (1952–2022) CA 27 (1915–2026) NY 19 (1941–2026) AZ 17 (1968–2024) NC 15 (1981–2024) TX 13 (1989–2019) MI 11 (1993–2024) IA 11 (1944–2025) WI 10 (1973–2026) OH 10 (1998–2026) PA 8 (1973–2024) MD 7 (1980–2026) IL 7 (1960–1995) NJ 6 (1981–2009) TN 5 (1999–2019) MN 5 (1935–2018) MO 5 (1986–2016) LA 4 (1954–1993) IN 4 (1972–2002) MA 4 (1979–1988) WA 4 (1932–1996) ME 4 (2014–2024) AL 3 (1936–1997) VI 3 (2013–2014) KS 3 (1996–2024) WY 3 (1992–2017) DC 2 (1975–1978) NE 2 (2025–2026) MT 2 (1987–1995) NM 2 (2010–2010) AR 2 (1997–2005) OR 2 (1966–2022) RI 2 (1994–2004) OK 2 (1938–1964)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check