Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1973–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rosenthal v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2023Thus, generalizing the principle from Martell, we conclude that, in Pharm., 457 A.2d 243, 245 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1983) (denying ineffective assistance claim in pharmacy board context where pharmacist alleged counsel erred in not arguing an entrapment defense and in saying pharmacist was lax in running his business). 25 Pre-Martell, we applied Johnson and Bickel in Mitchell v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Neal Tree Service), 565 A.2d 224, 226 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989) (finding that claimant’s scenario distinguishable from Bickel where an attorney had not entered an appearance and the claimant failed | 1 | 1 |
Mitchell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2023Thus, generalizing the principle from Martell, we conclude that, in Pharm., 457 A.2d 243, 245 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1983) (denying ineffective assistance claim in pharmacy board context where pharmacist alleged counsel erred in not arguing an entrapment defense and in saying pharmacist was lax in running his business). 25 Pre-Martell, we applied Johnson and Bickel in Mitchell v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Neal Tree Service), 565 A.2d 224, 226 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989) (finding that claimant’s scenario distinguishable from Bickel where an attorney had not entered an appearance and the claimant failed | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
green
2 sentences2024Absent this exacting standard, “piecemeal hearings prompted by the wisdom of hindsight would become the rule rather than the exception.” Martell, 707 A.2d at 244 . 2023In Martell, Judge Leadbetter cogently observed that absent that standard, “piecemeal hearings prompted by the wisdom of hindsight would become the rule rather than the exception.” Id. | 2 | 2023–2024 |
Townsend Will
green
1 sentence2020While ‘fishing expeditions’ are not to be countenanced under the guise of discovery, requests for discovery must be considered with liberality as the rule rather than the exception.” In Re Townsend’s Estate, 241 A.2d 534 (Pa. 1968). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Thompson Will
green
1 sentence2007Id. ¶ 7 Finally, Appellant asserts that dismissal of his civil complaint with prejudice subjects his claim to the future defense of collateral estoppel in the Orphans’ Court. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Silverman v. POLIS
green
2 sentences1985The impetus for the rule change came at the behest of this Court in Silverman v. Polis, 230 Pa.Super. 366 , 326 A.2d 452 (1974). 1985The impetus for the rule change came at the behest of this Court in Silverman v. Polis, 230 Pa.Super. 366 , 326 A.2d 452 (1974). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Chavigny v. State
green
2 sentences1984Id. at 174 . 1984Id. at 174 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences1980We note further that the vitality of the view advanced by appellees, that summary judgment is the rule rather than the exception in public official defamation cases, has been cast in doubt as a result of the United States Supreme Court’s observation in Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. Ill, 99 S.Ct. 2675 , 61 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979): Considering the nuances of the issues raised here, we are constrained to express some doubt about the so-called “rule.” The proof of “actual malice” calls a defendant’s state of mind into question, New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 1980We note further that the vitality of the view advanced by appellees, that summary judgment is the rule rather than the exception in public official defamation cases, has been cast in doubt as a result of the United States Supreme Court’s observation in Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. Ill, 99 S.Ct. 2675 , 61 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979): Considering the nuances of the issues raised here, we are constrained to express some doubt about the so-called “rule.” The proof of “actual malice” calls a defendant’s state of mind into question, New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
green
2 sentences1980We note further that the vitality of the view advanced by appellees, that summary judgment is the rule rather than the exception in public official defamation cases, has been cast in doubt as a result of the United States Supreme Court’s observation in Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. Ill, 99 S.Ct. 2675 , 61 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979): Considering the nuances of the issues raised here, we are constrained to express some doubt about the so-called “rule.” The proof of “actual malice” calls a defendant’s state of mind into question, New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 1980We note further that the vitality of the view advanced by appellees, that summary judgment is the rule rather than the exception in public official defamation cases, has been cast in doubt as a result of the United States Supreme Court’s observation in Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. Ill, 99 S.Ct. 2675 , 61 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979): Considering the nuances of the issues raised here, we are constrained to express some doubt about the so-called “rule.” The proof of “actual malice” calls a defendant’s state of mind into question, New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. Middle States Ass'n of Colleges & Secondary Schools, Inc.
green
1 sentence1973Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 965 (1970)) which purport to stand for the proposition that judicial interference in the affairs of private associations is the rule rather than the exception. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.