13 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re AMgreen2 sentences2006The court concluded that the Attorney General, while authorized to defend against Mullen’s offset claim, lacked standing to defend against Mullen’s reimbursement claim, a claim which could only be brought against Chism, the obligee. 101 S.W.3d at 484. 2006The court concluded that the Attorney General, while authorized to defend against Mullen's offset claim, lacked standing to defend against Mullen's reimbursement claim, a claim which could only be brought against Chism, the obligee. 101 S.W.3d at 484. | 2 | 2 |
City of Irving v. Seppygreen1 sentence2022In City of Irving v. Seppy, the city owned “and operated” the premises in question. 301 S.W.3d 435, 439 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Quintana v. CrossFit Dallas, L.L.C.green1 sentence2015See Gonerway v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 442 S.W.3d 443, 446 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2013, no pet.) (appellant failed to inform the trial court of her motion for continuance or obtain a ruling on it; therefore, she waived her issue); Quintana v. CrossFit Dallas, L.L.C., 347 S.W.3d 445, 449 (Tex. App—Dallas 2011, no pet.) (same); Bryant v. Jeter, 341 S.W.3d 447, 451 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011, no pet.) (same); Hightower v. Baylor Univ. | 1 | 1 |
Bryant v. Jetergreen1 sentence2015See Gonerway v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 442 S.W.3d 443, 446 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2013, no pet.) (appellant failed to inform the trial court of her motion for continuance or obtain a ruling on it; therefore, she waived her issue); Quintana v. CrossFit Dallas, L.L.C., 347 S.W.3d 445, 449 (Tex. App—Dallas 2011, no pet.) (same); Bryant v. Jeter, 341 S.W.3d 447, 451 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011, no pet.) (same); Hightower v. Baylor Univ. | 1 | 1 |
Dezma Gonerway v. Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.green1 sentence2015See Gonerway v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 442 S.W.3d 443, 446 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2013, no pet.) (appellant failed to inform the trial court of her motion for continuance or obtain a ruling on it; therefore, she waived her issue); Quintana v. CrossFit Dallas, L.L.C., 347 S.W.3d 445, 449 (Tex. App—Dallas 2011, no pet.) (same); Bryant v. Jeter, 341 S.W.3d 447, 451 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011, no pet.) (same); Hightower v. Baylor Univ. | 1 | 1 |
Bahn v. Starckegreen2 sentences2015In the case of Bahn v. Starcke, 89 Tex. 203, 208 , 34 S.W. 103, 106 ( 59 Am. 2015In the case of Bahn v. Starcke, 89 Tex. 203, 208 , 34 S.W. 103, 106 ( 59 Am. | 1 | 1 |
Perry v. Pondergreen1 sentence1998See Perry v. Ponder, 604 S.W.2d 306, 312-13 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1980, no wilt). | 1 | 1 |
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson Cityred2 sentences1995See Williamson, 473 U.S. at 192 , 105 S.Ct. at 3119 ; MacDonald, 477 U.S. at 351-52 , 106 S.Ct. at 2567-68 . d. 1995See Williamson, 473 U.S. at 192 , 105 S.Ct. at 3119 ; MacDonald, 477 U.S. at 351-52 , 106 S.Ct. at 2567-68 . d. | 1 | 1 |
Rousey Ex Rel. Rousey v. Rouseygreen2 sentences1988In support of their argument that the time has now arrived for a further limitation upon parental immunity, appellants place heavy reliance upon Rousey v. Rousey, 499 A.2d 1199, 1202 (D.C.App.1985), wherein the Court conducted a considerable expedition into the origin and development of the parental immunity doctrine, as well as the recent defections from the support of the doctrine. 1988That Court came to the conclusion that the parental immunity doctrine would serve no purpose in a suit such as that one, where “the parent against whom suit is brought has liability insurance.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Presley
green
2 sentences2006See id. ; Presley , 166 S.W.3d at 869 . 2006See id.; Presley, 166 S.W.3d at 869 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
United States v. Goodwin
green
2 sentences2004Goodwin, 457 U.S. at 384 n. 19, 102 S.Ct. 2485 (quoting government’s brief that "the defendant is free to tender evidence to the court to support a claim that enhanced charges are a direct and unjustifiable penalty for the exercise of a procedural right. 2004Goodwin, 457 U.S. at 384 n. 19, 102 S.Ct. 2485 (quoting government’s brief that "the defendant is free to tender evidence to the court to support a claim that enhanced charges are a direct and unjustifiable penalty for the exercise of a procedural right. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Blackledge v. Perry
green
2 sentences2004Of course, only in a rare case would a defendant be able to overcome the presumptive validity of the prosecutor's actions through such a demonstration"). [12] Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21 , 94 S.Ct. 2098 , 40 L.Ed.2d 628 (1974). 2004Of course, only in a rare case would a defendant be able to overcome the presumptive validity of the prosecutor's actions through such a demonstration"). [12] Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21 , 94 S.Ct. 2098 , 40 L.Ed.2d 628 (1974). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County
green
2 sentences1995See Williamson, 473 U.S. at 192 , 105 S.Ct. at 3119 ; MacDonald, 477 U.S. at 351-52 , 106 S.Ct. at 2567-68 . d. 1995See Williamson, 473 U.S. at 192 , 105 S.Ct. at 3119 ; MacDonald, 477 U.S. at 351-52 , 106 S.Ct. at 2567-68 . d. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Zeisler Ex Rel. Zeisler v. Zeisler
green
1 sentence1980DUE PROCESS AS APPLIED TO CONSERVATORSHIP A. Distinction Between Support and Conserva torship Due process requirements have a different impact on the question of jurisdiction in a suit concerning conservatorship, as this court recognized in Zeisler v. Zeisler, 553 S.W.2d 927, 931 n. 3 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1977, writ dism’d). 2 A support claim is like a claim for debt in that it seeks a *313 personal judgment establishing a direct obligation to pay money. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.