support exception (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

support exception in Michigan

8 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1866–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Major v. Village of Newberrygreen
michctapp · 2016 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026A plaintiff may do so “(1) by showing the reasons had no basis in fact, (2) if they have a basis in fact, by showing that they were not the actual factors motivating the decision, or (3) if they were factors, by showing that they were jointly insufficient to justify the decision.” Major, 316 Mich App at 542 (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2 Stockmeyer claims that “Mehney fell under the purview of Dilday, just as Stockmeyer did.” Yet the affidavit he cites as the sole support for this claim indicates that “Mr. McAuley” and Bitzer— not Marcus or Dilday—were Mehney’s supervisors. -7- Huts

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
Hazle v. Ford Motor Co. green
mich · 2001
1 sentence

2026Hazle, 464 Mich at 464 .

12026–2026
Grp, Ltd v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc green
mich · 1978
2 sentences

2000The only support for the exception the majority announces today is found in two cases— Star Transfer Line v. General Exporting Co., 308 Mich. 86 , 13 N.W.2d 217 (1944) and GRP, Ltd. v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc., 70 Mich.App. 671 , 247 N.W.2d 583 (1976), aff'd. 402 Mich. 107 , 261 N.W.2d 707 (1978).

2000The only support for the exception the majority announces today is found in two cases — Star Transfer Line v General Exporting Co, 308 Mich 86 ; 13 NW2d 217 (1944), and GRP, Ltd v United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc, 70 Mich App 671 ; 247 NW2d 583 (1976), aff d 402 Mich 107 (1978).

12000–2000
GRP, Ltd. v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. green
michctapp · 1976
2 sentences

2000The only support for the exception the majority announces today is found in two cases — Star Transfer Line v General Exporting Co, 308 Mich 86 ; 13 NW2d 217 (1944), and GRP, Ltd v United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc, 70 Mich App 671 ; 247 NW2d 583 (1976), aff d 402 Mich 107 (1978).

2000The only support for the exception the majority announces today is found in two cases — Star Transfer Line v General Exporting Co, 308 Mich 86 ; 13 NW2d 217 (1944), and GRP, Ltd v United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc, 70 Mich App 671 ; 247 NW2d 583 (1976), aff d 402 Mich 107 (1978).

12000–2000
Star Transfer Line v. General Exporting Co. green
mich · 1944
2 sentences

2000The only support for the exception the majority announces today is found in two cases — Star Transfer Line v General Exporting Co, 308 Mich 86 ; 13 NW2d 217 (1944), and GRP, Ltd v United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc, 70 Mich App 671 ; 247 NW2d 583 (1976), aff d 402 Mich 107 (1978).

2000The only support for the exception the majority announces today is found in two cases — Star Transfer Line v General Exporting Co, 308 Mich 86 ; 13 NW2d 217 (1944), and GRP, Ltd v United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc, 70 Mich App 671 ; 247 NW2d 583 (1976), aff d 402 Mich 107 (1978).

12000–2000
Gerhardt v. Estate of Moore green
wis · 1989
1 sentence

2000However, as the dissent in Gerhardt notes, there is an important distinction between the facts in Clark, supra, and the facts in Gerhardt : Where the statute of limitations in Clark , according to the Supreme Court, might prevent a mother from bringing a support claim on behalf of the nonmarital child because she might not act to protect the child's interest in a timely manner, the settlement provision of the Wisconsin Statutes at issue in this case encourages her to do so. [ Id. at 578 , 441 N.W.2d 734 (Callow, J., dissenting).] Likewise, M.C.L. § 722.713; MSA 25.493 did not operate to "preve

12000–2000
Clark v. Jeter green
scotus · 1988
1 sentence

2000However, as the dissent in Gerhardt notes, there is an important distinction between the facts in Clark, supra, and the facts in Gerhardt : Where the statute of limitations in Clark , according to the Supreme Court, might prevent a mother from bringing a support claim on behalf of the nonmarital child because she might not act to protect the child’s interest in a timely manner, the settlement provision of the Wisconsin Statutes at issue in this case encourages her to do so. [Id. at 578 (Callow, J., dissenting).] Likewise, MCL 722.713; MSA 25.493 did not operate to “prevent a mother from bringi

12000–2000
Javis v. Board of Education of the School District green
mich · 1975
2 sentences

1985Carbonell v Bluhm, 114 Mich App 216 ; 318 NW2d 659 (1982); Javis v Ypsilanti School Dist, 393 Mich 689 ; 227 NW2d 543 (1975).

1985Carbonell v Bluhm, 114 Mich App 216 ; 318 NW2d 659 (1982); Javis v Ypsilanti School Dist, 393 Mich 689 ; 227 NW2d 543 (1975).

11985–1985
Carbonell v. Bluhm green
michctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1985Carbonell v Bluhm, 114 Mich App 216 ; 318 NW2d 659 (1982); Javis v Ypsilanti School Dist, 393 Mich 689 ; 227 NW2d 543 (1975).

1985Carbonell v Bluhm, 114 Mich App 216 ; 318 NW2d 659 (1982); Javis v Ypsilanti School Dist, 393 Mich 689 ; 227 NW2d 543 (1975).

11985–1985
Price v. Price green
mich · 1975
2 sentences

1976The recent Supreme Court ruling in Price v Price, 395 Mich 6 ; 232 NW2d 630 (1975), which was decided after arguments in this case, held that the Age of Majority Act does not affect obligations which accrued before January 1, 1972, the effective date of that act.

1976The recent Supreme Court ruling in Price v Price, 395 Mich 6 ; 232 NW2d 630 (1975), which was decided after arguments in this case, held that the Age of Majority Act does not affect obligations which accrued before January 1, 1972, the effective date of that act.

11976–1976
Glover v. Scotten neutral
mich · 1890
1 sentence

1905Our own case of Glover v. Scotten, 82 Mich. 369 , is cited with approval in Warden v. Railroad Co., and commented on as follows: “But the strongest support of this doctrine is found in the circumstances of a Michigan case, and the several decisions which were made in different actions which grew out of it.

11905–1905
Lingham v. Eggleston green
mich · 1873
2 sentences

1887The refusal to deliver-the cow grew entirely out of the fact that, before the plaintiff called upon Graham for her, they-discovered she was not barren, and therefore of greater value than they had sold her for. „ „ The following cases in this Court support the instruction of the court below as to the intent of the parties governing and controlling the question of a completed sale, and the pissing of title: Lingham v. Eggleston, 27 Mich. 324 ; Wilkinson v. Holiday, 33 Id. 386 ; Grant v. Merchants’ and Manufacturers’ Bank, 35 Id. 527; Carpenter v. Graham, 42 Id. 194; Brewer v. Michigan Salt Ass’

1887The refusal to deliver-the cow grew entirely out of the fact that, before the plaintiff called upon Graham for her, they-discovered she was not barren, and therefore of greater value than they had sold her for. „ „ The following cases in this Court support the instruction of the court below as to the intent of the parties governing and controlling the question of a completed sale, and the pissing of title: Lingham v. Eggleston, 27 Mich. 324 ; Wilkinson v. Holiday, 33 Id. 386 ; Grant v. Merchants’ and Manufacturers’ Bank, 35 Id. 527; Carpenter v. Graham, 42 Id. 194; Brewer v. Michigan Salt Ass’

11887–1887
Robert Boyce, in Error v. Paul Anderson, in Error green
scotus · 1829
1 sentence

1866Angell on Carriers, § 522; Story on Bailm. § 390; Boyce v. Anderson, 2 Pet. 150 .

11866–1866

Where else courts name it

PA 54 (1928–2026) NY 48 (1876–2026) NJ 37 (1967–2026) VA 19 (1991–2026) CA 17 (1911–2025) TX 14 (1929–2022) IL 12 (1901–2026) OH 11 (1933–2022) IN 10 (1897–2019) KS 9 (1891–2022) LA 9 (1905–2015) MS 9 (1931–2005) GA 8 (1922–2013) NV 8 (1962–2023) MI 8 (1866–2026) NC 8 (1906–2023) IA 8 (1893–2007) WA 7 (1921–2025) FL 7 (1980–2019) ID 6 (1928–2019) MO 5 (1883–2003) OK 5 (1995–2013) TN 5 (1937–2015) UT 4 (1935–2022) OR 4 (1936–2003) CT 4 (1959–2013) WI 4 (1912–2024) AZ 3 (1948–1999) MT 3 (1923–2009) MA 3 (1962–2003) ND 3 (1893–1988) MN 3 (1934–1951) AR 2 (1993–2023) RI 2 (1993–2002) WY 2 (1937–1987) DC 2 (1995–2009) AL 2 (1916–1940) NE 2 (1996–1996) MD 2 (1964–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check