Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Haynes v. Mangham
green
2 sentences1985The juvenile court indicated its awareness of the Louisiana Supreme Court's holding in Haynes v. Mangum, 375 So.2d 103 (La.1979) that a significant contribution of support in the year prior to the adoption proceeding may satisfy the support requirement of LSA-R.S. 9:422.1. 1985The juvenile court indicated its awareness of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s holding in Haynes v. Mangum, 375 So.2d 103 (La.1979) that a significant contribution of support in the year prior to the adoption proceeding may satisfy the support requirement of LSA-R.S. 9:422.1. | 3 | 1983–1985 |
In Re Hartley
green
1 sentence2015See In re: Hartley, 03-2828 (La.4/2/04), 869 So.2d 799 (declining to impose formal discipline and dismissing charges given the “totality of the circumstances”); In re: Cabibi 05-1217 (La.2/22/06), 922 So.2d 490 (ordering formal charges dismissed). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In re Cabibi
neutral
1 sentence2015See In re: Hartley, 03-2828 (La.4/2/04), 869 So.2d 799 (declining to impose formal discipline and dismissing charges given the “totality of the circumstances”); In re: Cabibi 05-1217 (La.2/22/06), 922 So.2d 490 (ordering formal charges dismissed). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Alfred
green
1 sentence2003There is no evidence before the court to support defense counsel's argument that Mr. Guilbeaux is a crucial witness. *203 As stated by the supreme court in Alfred, 337 So.2d 1049 , incarceration and the deprivation of liberty resulting therefrom is always prejudicial. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Patrick v. Patrick
green
1 sentence1987Pardue, supra; Patrick, supra. Conversion of a support rule into a contract action at the conclusion of the case is not a proper method to determine whether a legally enforceable contract was entered into by the parties. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Pardue v. Livingston Parish School Board
green
1 sentence1987Pardue, supra; Patrick, supra. Conversion of a support rule into a contract action at the conclusion of the case is not a proper method to determine whether a legally enforceable contract was entered into by the parties. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Succession of Farley
green
2 sentences1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . 1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Houghton v. Hall
green
2 sentences1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . 1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Sharp v. Zeller
green
2 sentences1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . 1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Succession of Andrus
neutral
2 sentences1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . 1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Succession of Watkins
green
2 sentences1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . 1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Lewis v. Clay
neutral
2 sentences1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . 1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Pearlstine v. Mattes
green
2 sentences1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . 1962Sharp v. Zeller, 110 La. 61 , 34 So. 129 ; Succession of Andrus, 131 La. 940 , 60 So. 623 .” Without any attempt to cite all the cases on the subject, the following also support the doctrine here under discussion: Succession of Farley, 205 La. 972 , 18 So.2d 586 ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La. 1032 , 67 So.2d 582 ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La. 237 , 148 So. 37 ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La. 663 , 60 So.2d 78 ; Succession of Watkins, 156 La. 1000 , 101 So. 395 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Wickwire v. Reinecke
green
2 sentences1941Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U.S. 101 , 48 S.Ct. 43 , 72 L.Ed. 184 ; Jones v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue [7 Cir.] 38 F.(2d) 550, 552 .” (Italics ours). 1941Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U.S. 101 , 48 S.Ct. 43 , 72 L.Ed. 184 ; Jones v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue [7 Cir.] 38 F.(2d) 550, 552 .” (Italics ours). | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Jones v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
green
1 sentence1941Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U.S. 101 , 48 S.Ct. 43 , 72 L.Ed. 184 ; Jones v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue [7 Cir.] 38 F.(2d) 550, 552 .” (Italics ours). | 1 | 1941–1941 |
State v. Magoon
green
1 sentence1905Counsel representing the prosecution cite State v. Magoon, 50 Vt. 333 , and State v. Harrison, 66 Vt. 523 , 29 Atl. 807 , 44 Am. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
State v. Harrison
neutral
1 sentence1905Counsel representing the prosecution cite State v. Magoon, 50 Vt. 333 , and State v. Harrison, 66 Vt. 523 , 29 Atl. 807 , 44 Am. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.