Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United Parcel Service of America v. Fettermangreen2 sentences2002The causative danger must be peculiar to the work, incidental to the character of the business, and not independent of the master-servant relationship.’ ” Chesterfield v. Johnson, 237 Va. 180, 183-84 , 376 S.E.2d 73, 75 (1989) (quoting United Parcel Service v. Fetterman, 230 Va. 257, 258-59 , 336 S.E.2d 892, 893 (1985)). 2002The causative danger must be peculiar to the work, incidental to the character of the business, and not independent of the master-servant relationship.’ ” Chesterfield v. Johnson, 237 Va. 180, 183-84 , 376 S.E.2d 73, 75 (1989) (quoting United Parcel Service v. Fetterman, 230 Va. 257, 258-59 , 336 S.E.2d 892, 893 (1985)). | 5 | 7 |
County of Chesterfield v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2003The causative danger must be peculiar to the work, incidental to the character of the business, and not independent of the master-servant relationship.’” Johnson, 237 Va. at 183-84 , 376 S.E.2d at 75 (citation omitted). 2003The causative danger must be peculiar to the work, incidental to the character of the business, and not independent of the master-servant relationship.’” Johnson, 237 Va. at 183-84 , 376 S.E.2d at 75 (citation omitted). | 4 | 8 |
Grove v. Allied Signal, Inc.green2 sentences2005But [the arising out of test] excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment.” Grove v. Allied Signal, Inc., 15 Va. App. 17, 19-20 , 421 S.E.2d 32, 34 (1992) (quoting R & T Investments, Ltd. v. Johns, 228 Va. 249, 252-53 , 321 S.E.2d 287, 289 (1984)). 2005But [the arising out of test] excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment.” Grove v. Allied Signal, Inc., 15 Va. App. 17, 19-20 , 421 S.E.2d 32, 34 (1992) (quoting R & T Investments, Ltd. v. Johns, 228 Va. 249, 252-53 , 321 S.E.2d 287, 289 (1984)). | 4 | 4 |
R & T INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. Johnsgreen2 sentences2005But [the arising out of test] excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment.” Grove v. Allied Signal, Inc., 15 Va. App. 17, 19-20 , 421 S.E.2d 32, 34 (1992) (quoting R & T Investments, Ltd. v. Johns, 228 Va. 249, 252-53 , 321 S.E.2d 287, 289 (1984)). 2005But [the arising out of test] excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment.” Grove v. Allied Signal, Inc., 15 Va. App. 17, 19-20 , 421 S.E.2d 32, 34 (1992) (quoting R & T Investments, Ltd. v. Johns, 228 Va. 249, 252-53 , 321 S.E.2d 287, 289 (1984)). | 4 | 4 |
Southland Corp. v. Parsongreen2 sentences1996In a personal risk or idiopathic case, the claimant’s injury is one “caused by a preexisting personal disease of the employee.” Southland Corp. v. Parson, 1 Va.App. 281, 283 , 338 S.E.2d 162, 163 (1985). 1996In a personal risk or idiopathic case, the claimant’s injury is one “caused by a preexisting personal disease of the employee.” Southland Corp. v. Parson, 1 Va.App. 281, 283 , 338 S.E.2d 162, 163 (1985). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.