Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1877–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wright v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.green2 sentences2010Co., 245 Va. 160, 170 , 427 S.E.2d 724, 729 (1993) (“[A] litigant will not be permitted to invite a trial court to commit error, either through agreeing or failing to object, and then be permitted to successfully complain of such error on appeal.” (emphasis added)); cf. Neal v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 416, 422 , 425 S.E.2d 521, 524-25 (1992) (explaining that the specifics of the objection are important to preserving an evidence issue for appeal). 2010Co., 245 Va. 160, 170 , 427 S.E.2d 724, 729 (1993) (“[A] litigant will not be permitted to invite a trial court to commit error, either through agreeing or failing to object, and then be permitted to successfully complain of such error on appeal.” (emphasis added)); cf. Neal v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 416, 422 , 425 S.E.2d 521, 524-25 (1992) (explaining that the specifics of the objection are important to preserving an evidence issue for appeal). | 4 | 5 |
Neal v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2010Co., 245 Va. 160, 170 , 427 S.E.2d 724, 729 (1993) (“[A] litigant will not be permitted to invite a trial court to commit error, either through agreeing or failing to object, and then be permitted to successfully complain of such error on appeal.” (emphasis added)); cf. Neal v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 416, 422 , 425 S.E.2d 521, 524-25 (1992) (explaining that the specifics of the objection are important to preserving an evidence issue for appeal). 2010Co., 245 Va. 160, 170 , 427 S.E.2d 724, 729 (1993) (“[A] litigant will not be permitted to invite a trial court to commit error, either through agreeing or failing to object, and then be permitted to successfully complain of such error on appeal.” (emphasis added)); cf. Neal v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 416, 422 , 425 S.E.2d 521, 524-25 (1992) (explaining that the specifics of the objection are important to preserving an evidence issue for appeal). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' r
green
2 sentences1925“A party cannot invite the court to commit error by asking for an erroneous instruction and be permitted afterwards to have the verdict set aside for the error into which the court has been misled.” Richmond Traction Co. v. Hildebrand, 99 Va. 52 , 34 S. E. 889 ; Kimball & Fink v. Friend, 95 Va. 125 , 27 S. E. 901 . 1925“A party cannot invite the court to commit error by asking for an erroneous instruction and be permitted afterwards to have the verdict set aside for the error into which the court has been misled.” Richmond Traction Co. v. Hildebrand, 99 Va. 52 , 34 S. E. 889 ; Kimball & Fink v. Friend, 95 Va. 125 , 27 S. E. 901 . | 6 | 1877–1925 |
Hilton v. Fayen
green
2 sentences1992Contrary to the language in Hilton v. Fayen, 196 Va. 860 , 86 S.E.2d 40 (1955), I do not believe that the defendant invited this court to commit error and now complains of it. 1992Contrary to the language in Hilton v. Fayen, 196 Va. 860 , 86 S.E.2d 40 (1955), I do not believe that the defendant invited this court to commit error and now complains of it. | 2 | 1992–1993 |
Richmond Traction Co. v. Hildebrand
neutral
2 sentences1903Kimball & Fink v. Friend, 95 Va. 125 , 27 S. E. 901 ; Richmond Traction Co. v. Hildebrand, 99 Va. 48, 52 , 34 S. E. 888 . 1903Kimball & Fink v. Friend, 95 Va. 125 , 27 S. E. 901 ; Richmond Traction Co. v. Hildebrand, 99 Va. 48, 52 , 34 S. E. 888 . | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.