record at the plea hearing (Wisconsin) · Go Syfert
← Wisconsin issues

record at the plea hearing in Wisconsin

13 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Cecchinigreen
wis · 1985 · cited in 5 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1985–2016
2 sentences

2016In State v. Cecchini, 124 Wis. 2d 200 , 368 N.W.2d 830 (1985), this court held unanimously that prior to acceptance of a plea, a trial court "must ascertain that the defendant understands the nature of the charge, and that this must be done on the record at the plea hearing." Cecchini, 124 Wis. 2d at 201 (emphasis added).

2016In State v. Cecchini, 124 Wis. 2d 200 , 368 N.W.2d 830 (1985), this court held unanimously that prior to acceptance of a plea, a trial court "must ascertain that the defendant understands the nature of the charge, and that this must be done on the record at the plea hearing." Cecchini, 124 Wis. 2d at 201 (emphasis added).

35
North Carolina v. Alfordgreen
scotus · 1970 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986Cf., North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 29, n. 3 (1970) ("Since the record in this case affirmatively indicates that Alford was aware of the consequences of his plea of guilty and of the rights waived by the plea, no issues of substance under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969) would be presented.. . .").

1986Cf., North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 29, n. 3 (1970) ("Since the record in this case affirmatively indicates that Alford was aware of the consequences of his plea of guilty and of the rights waived by the plea, no issues of substance under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969) would be presented.. . .").

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Bangert green
wis · 1986
2 sentences

1987In State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246 , 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), we overruled CecchinVs requirement that the trial court demonstrate on the record at the plea hearing the defendant’s understanding of the elements of the crime charged and their relation to the facts.

1987In State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246 , 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), we overruled CecchinVs requirement that the trial court demonstrate on the record at the plea hearing the defendant’s understanding of the elements of the crime charged and their relation to the facts.

31987–2020
State v. Harrington green
wisctapp · 1994
2 sentences

2025Reel raised no objection to this report at the time of the plea hearing, nor did he contradict the State’s representation that this lab report with the specific amount of THC found in his blood had been provided to him. ¶15 Nevertheless, Reel compares his case to State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d 985 , 512 N.W.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1994), where we concluded that plea withdrawal was necessary because of the circuit court’s failure to establish a factual basis for the defendant’s plea to felony theft of property over $1,000 in value.

2025Reel raised no objection to this report at the time of the plea hearing, nor did he contradict the State’s representation that this lab report with the specific amount of THC found in his blood had been provided to him. ¶15 Nevertheless, Reel compares his case to State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d 985 , 512 N.W.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1994), where we concluded that plea withdrawal was necessary because of the circuit court’s failure to establish a factual basis for the defendant’s plea to felony theft of property over $1,000 in value.

12025–2025
State v. Garcia green
wis · 1995
1 sentence

2022Id. at 266. ¶13 “If a defendant … shows that the circuit court did not determine on the record at the plea hearing that the defendant understood the nature of the crimes charged, the burden shifts to the State to show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered.” Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d at 865 (citing Bangert, 141 Wis. 2d at 275).

12022–2022
State v. Howell green
wis · 2007
1 sentence

2022Thus, “[i]n keeping with Bangert, we examine the record at the plea hearing[.]” Howell, 301 Wis. 2d 350, ¶7 .

12022–2022
State v. MacHner green
wis · 1979
2 sentences

2009By the Court. — Judgment affirmed; order reversed and cause remanded with directions. 1 State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 804 , 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. 3 Wesley's trial counsel entered the terms of the plea agreement on the record at the plea hearing.

2009By the Court. — Judgment affirmed; order reversed and cause remanded with directions. 1 State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 804 , 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. 3 Wesley's trial counsel entered the terms of the plea agreement on the record at the plea hearing.

12009–2009
State v. Carter green
wis · 1986
1 sentence

1995Id. at 261 n.3. [17-19] If a defendant who filed an appeal pursuant to sec. 974.02 and 809.30, Stats. (1993-94), shows that the circuit court did not determine on the record at the plea hearing that the defendant understood the nature of the crimes charged, the burden shifts to the State to show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered.

11995–1995
Boykin v. Alabama green
scotus · 1969
2 sentences

1986Cf., North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 29, n. 3 (1970) ("Since the record in this case affirmatively indicates that Alford was aware of the consequences of his plea of guilty and of the rights waived by the plea, no issues of substance under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969) would be presented.. . .").

1986Cf., North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 29, n. 3 (1970) ("Since the record in this case affirmatively indicates that Alford was aware of the consequences of his plea of guilty and of the rights waived by the plea, no issues of substance under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969) would be presented.. . .").

11986–1986
State Ex Rel. Burnett v. Burke green
wis · 1964
2 sentences

1985Burnett v. Burke, 22 Wis. 2d 486, 494 , 126 N.W. 2d 91 (1964) and made mandatory in Ernst v. State, 43 Wis. 2d 661, 674 , 170 N.W. 2d 713 (1969).

1985Burnett v. Burke, 22 Wis. 2d 486, 494 , 126 N.W. 2d 91 (1964) and made mandatory in Ernst v. State, 43 Wis. 2d 661, 674 , 170 N.W. 2d 713 (1969).

11985–1985
Ernst v. State green
wis · 1969
2 sentences

1985Burnett v. Burke, 22 Wis. 2d 486, 494 , 126 N.W. 2d 91 (1964) and made mandatory in Ernst v. State, 43 Wis. 2d 661, 674 , 170 N.W. 2d 713 (1969).

1985Burnett v. Burke, 22 Wis. 2d 486, 494 , 126 N.W. 2d 91 (1964) and made mandatory in Ernst v. State, 43 Wis. 2d 661, 674 , 170 N.W. 2d 713 (1969).

11985–1985

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WI § Wis. Stat. § 971.08 (9) WI § Wis. Stat. § 808.10 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 974.02 (4) USC § 8u.s.c.1182 (3) USC § 8u.s.c.1227 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 809.30 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 948.02 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 978.02 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MN 30 (2007–2026) WI 13 (1985–2025) OH 6 (2004–2025) IA 3 (2017–2017) MS 3 (2016–2022) WA 3 (1995–2000) MO 2 (1995–2006) GA 2 (2009–2023) MD 2 (2018–2021) TN 2 (2018–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check