Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1992–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
County Fire Door Corp. v. C. F. Wooding Co.
green
2 sentences1999F. Wooding Co., 202 Conn. 277, 281-82 , 520 A.2d 1028 (1987); Kelly v. Kowalsky, 186 Conn. 618, 621 , 442 A.2d 1355 (1982). 1999F. Wooding Co., 202 Conn. 277, 281-82 , 520 A.2d 1028 (1987); Kelly v. Kowalsky, 186 Conn. 618, 621 , 442 A.2d 1355 (1982). | 6 | 1992–1999 |
Blake v. Blake
green
2 sentences1999“When there is a good faith dispute about the existence of a debt or about the amount that is owed, the common law [doctrine of accord and satisfaction] authorizes the debtor and the creditor to negotiate a contract of accord to settle the outstanding claim.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Blake v. Blake, 211 Conn. 485, 491 , 560 A.2d 396 (1989); County Fire Door Corp. v. C. 1999“When there is a good faith dispute about the existence of a debt or about the amount that is owed, the common law [doctrine of accord and satisfaction] authorizes the debtor and the creditor to negotiate a contract of accord to settle the outstanding claim.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Blake v. Blake, 211 Conn. 485, 491 , 560 A.2d 396 (1989); County Fire Door Corp. v. C. | 3 | 1993–2001 |
B & B Bail Bonds Agency of Connecticut, Inc. v. Bailey
green
2 sentences2009The defendants have pleaded that as a special defense to each of the plaintiffs three counts. *521 “When there is a good faith dispute about the existence of a debt or about the amount that is owed, the common law authorizes the debtor and the creditor to negotiate a contract of accord to settle the outstanding claim.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) B & B Bail Bonds Agency of Connecticut, Inc. v. Bailey, 256 Conn. 209, 212-13 , 770 A.2d 960 (2001). 2009The defendants have pleaded that as a special defense to each of the plaintiffs three counts. *521 “When there is a good faith dispute about the existence of a debt or about the amount that is owed, the common law authorizes the debtor and the creditor to negotiate a contract of accord to settle the outstanding claim.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) B & B Bail Bonds Agency of Connecticut, Inc. v. Bailey, 256 Conn. 209, 212-13 , 770 A.2d 960 (2001). | 2 | 2002–2009 |
Munroe v. Emhart Corp.
green
2 sentences2009“To prove an accord and satisfaction, the defendant must show that at the time of the agreement there was a good faith dispute over the existence of a debt or over an amount owed, and that the debtor and the creditor negotiated a contract of accord to settle the claim.” Munroe v. Emhart Corp., 46 Conn. App. 37, 42 , 699 A.2d 213 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 926 , 701 A.2d 658 (1997). 2009“To prove an accord and satisfaction, the defendant must show that at the time of the agreement there was a good faith dispute over the existence of a debt or over an amount owed, and that the debtor and the creditor negotiated a contract of accord to settle the claim.” Munroe v. Emhart Corp., 46 Conn. App. 37, 42 , 699 A.2d 213 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 926 , 701 A.2d 658 (1997). | 2 | 1997–2009 |
Connecticut National Bank v. D'Onofrio
green
1 sentence2009“To prove an accord and satisfaction, the defendant must show that at the time of the agreement there was a good faith dispute over the existence of a debt or over an amount owed, and that the debtor and the creditor negotiated a contract of accord to settle the claim.” Munroe v. Emhart Corp., 46 Conn. App. 37, 42 , 699 A.2d 213 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 926 , 701 A.2d 658 (1997). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Mehta v. Abdelsayed
green
1 sentence2009“To prove an accord and satisfaction, the defendant must show that at the time of the agreement there was a good faith dispute over the existence of a debt or over an amount owed, and that the debtor and the creditor negotiated a contract of accord to settle the claim.” Munroe v. Emhart Corp., 46 Conn. App. 37, 42 , 699 A.2d 213 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 926 , 701 A.2d 658 (1997). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. Partnership
green
2 sentences2001Partnership, 236 Conn. 750, 764 , 674 A.2d 1313 (1996). 2001Partnership, 236 Conn. 750, 764 , 674 A.2d 1313 (1996). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Kelly v. Kowalsky
green
2 sentences1999F. Wooding Co., 202 Conn. 277, 281-82 , 520 A.2d 1028 (1987); Kelly v. Kowalsky, 186 Conn. 618, 621 , 442 A.2d 1355 (1982). 1999F. Wooding Co., 202 Conn. 277, 281-82 , 520 A.2d 1028 (1987); Kelly v. Kowalsky, 186 Conn. 618, 621 , 442 A.2d 1355 (1982). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Tolland Enterprises v. Scan-Code, Inc.
green
2 sentences1997Performance of the accord discharges the original duty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Tolland Enterprises v. Scan-Code, Inc., 239 Conn. 326 , 333 , 684 A.2d 1150 (1996). "[W]hen there is a good faith dispute about the existence of a debt or about the amount that is owed, the common law authorizes the debtor and the creditor to negotiate a contract of accord to settle the outstanding claim . . . . 1997Performance of the accord discharges the original duty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Tolland Enterprises v. Scan-Code, Inc., 239 Conn. 326 , 333 , 684 A.2d 1150 (1996). "[W]hen there is a good faith dispute about the existence of a debt or about the amount that is owed, the common law authorizes the debtor and the creditor to negotiate a contract of accord to settle the outstanding claim . . . . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
O & P Realty v. Santana
green
2 sentences1993As said in O P Realty v. Santana, 17 Conn. App. 314 , 317 , 551 A.2d 1287 (1989), ". . . a condition precedent to the making of a contract of accord and satisfaction is that there be a dispute as to the amount owed or an unliquidated claim. 1993As said in O P Realty v. Santana, 17 Conn. App. 314 , 317 , 551 A.2d 1287 (1989), ". . . a condition precedent to the making of a contract of accord and satisfaction is that there be a dispute as to the amount owed or an unliquidated claim. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.