plaintiffs make claim in Connecticut

12 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1976–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
Gangemi v. Zoning Board of Appealsgreen conn · 2001 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023 2 sentences 2023See, e.g., Gangemi v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 255 Conn. 143, 151 , 763 A.2d 1011 (2001). 2023See, e.g., Gangemi v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 255 Conn. 143, 151 , 763 A.2d 1011 (2001).	2	2
State v. Dillardgreen conn · 2001 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005Because the conservation plan was not in evidence before the trial court when it rendered its judgment dismissing the appeal, and we do not take new evidence at this level of appeal; see State v. Dillard, 66 Conn. App. 238 , 248 n.11, 784 A.2d 387 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 431 (2001); we grant the defendants’ motion to strike. 2005Because the conservation plan was not in evidence before the trial court when it rendered its judgment dismissing the appeal, and we do not take new evidence at this level of appeal; see State v. Dillard, 66 Conn. App. 238 , 248 n.11, 784 A.2d 387 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 431 (2001); we grant the defendants’ motion to strike.	1	1
State v. Dillardgreen connappct · 2001 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005Because the conservation plan was not in evidence before the trial court when it rendered its judgment dismissing the appeal, and we do not take new evidence at this level of appeal; see State v. Dillard, 66 Conn. App. 238 , 248 n.11, 784 A.2d 387 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 431 (2001); we grant the defendants’ motion to strike. 2005Because the conservation plan was not in evidence before the trial court when it rendered its judgment dismissing the appeal, and we do not take new evidence at this level of appeal; see State v. Dillard, 66 Conn. App. 238 , 248 n.11, 784 A.2d 387 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 431 (2001); we grant the defendants’ motion to strike.	1	1
State v. Whitegreen conn · 1975 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976Ed. 2d 656 ; see also State v. White, 169 Conn. 223, 239 , 363 A.2d 143 ; and the plaintiffs make no claim that they were not afforded due process of law. 1976Ed. 2d 656 ; see also State v. White, 169 Conn. 223, 239 , 363 A.2d 143 ; and the plaintiffs make no claim that they were not afforded due process of law.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 2008The plaintiffs make no claim on appeal that the trial court was required to accept this valuation over the valuation of the defendants’ expert. 21 Although the amount stated in the plaintiffs’ brief is $3,957,632.25, it appears that this is a mathematical error and that the correct sum is $3,957,652.25. 22 The plaintiffs rely on BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp., 511 U.S. 531, 534 , 114 S. Ct. 1757 , 128 L. 2008The plaintiffs make no claim on appeal that the trial court was required to accept this valuation over the valuation of the defendants’ expert. 21 Although the amount stated in the plaintiffs’ brief is $3,957,632.25, it appears that this is a mathematical error and that the correct sum is $3,957,652.25. 22 The plaintiffs rely on BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp., 511 U.S. 531, 534 , 114 S. Ct. 1757 , 128 L.	1	2008–2008
Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Coventry green conn · 1992 2 sentences 2003Although notice requirements may be jurisdictional; Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 223 Conn. 171, 174-75 , 610 A.2d 1301 (1992); in this case the plaintiffs make no such claim. 2003Although notice requirements may be jurisdictional; Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 223 Conn. 171, 174-75 , 610 A.2d 1301 (1992); in this case the plaintiffs make no such claim.	1	2003–2003
Lawson v. Whitey's Frame Shop green conn · 1997 2 sentences 2000We need not decide, however, whether the presence of bad faith in the performance of a valid contract could form the basis of a CUTPA claim because the plaintiffs make no such claim in this case." Lawson v. Whitey's Frame Shop , 241 Conn. 678 , 688 , 697 A.2d 1137 (1997). 2000We need not decide, however, whether the presence of bad faith in the performance of a valid contract could form the basis of a CUTPA claim because the plaintiffs make no such claim in this case." Lawson v. Whitey's Frame Shop , 241 Conn. 678 , 688 , 697 A.2d 1137 (1997).	1	2000–2000
Williams v. City of New Haven green conn · 1998 1 sentence 2000At common law a municipality was generally immune from liability for negligence, Williams v. New Haven , 243 Conn. 763 , 766 (1998).	1	2000–2000
Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals green conn · 1988 1 sentence 1997The plaintiffs make the claim in their brief that § 14.2.4 of the Coventry zoning regulations is illegal in that it provides that "[a]ny non-conforming use shall lose its non-conforming status and shall thereafter conform to these Regulations if said use is abandoned for a period of one (1) year or more . . .", thereby constituting what they perceive to be a violation of § 8-2 of the General Statutes which prohibits any local regulation that imposes a time limitation on a nonconforming use "solely as a result of nonuse . . . without regard to the intent of the property owner to maintain that u	1	1997–1997
Dewart v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. green conn · 1953 1 sentence 1994There is no question here then that the issues raised and the claims made by the plaintiffs in the First Count arise out of and are related to the Deferred Compensation Agreement of which the arbitration clause is a part. (2) In their opposition to the defendant's motion to stay court proceedings which will allow the arbitration agreed upon by both parties to proceed the plaintiffs make no claim that the arbitration agreement should be declared void because of fraud, misrepresentation or duress, Dewart v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. , 140 Conn. 446 .	1	1994–1994
Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial Hospital green conn · 1987 1 sentence 1994Practice Book § 384 provides that summary judgment "shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, affidavits and any other proof submitted show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Practice Book § 384; Connelly v. Housing Authority , 213 Conn. 354 , 364 (1990); Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial Hospital , 213 Conn. 399 , 402 , 528 A.2d 805 (1987).	1	1994–1994
Connelly v. Housing Authority of New Haven green conn · 1990 1 sentence 1994Practice Book § 384 provides that summary judgment "shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, affidavits and any other proof submitted show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Practice Book § 384; Connelly v. Housing Authority , 213 Conn. 354 , 364 (1990); Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial Hospital , 213 Conn. 399 , 402 , 528 A.2d 805 (1987).	1	1994–1994
Two Sisters, Inc. v. Gosch & Co. green conn · 1976 1 sentence 1994In fact if CT Page 8343 the court performs the excision they request the plaintiffs suggest the matter could then be submitted to arbitration cf Two Sisters Inc. v. Gosch Co. , 171 Conn. at p. 498 .	1	1994–1994
Clark v. Town of Cornwall neutral conn · 1919 2 sentences 1985Clark v. Cornwall, 93 Conn. 374 , 106 A. 347 (1919), is persuasive authority to uphold the validity of the town’s actions. 1985Clark v. Cornwall, 93 Conn. 374 , 106 A. 347 (1919), is persuasive authority to uphold the validity of the town’s actions.	1	1985–1985

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 12 (1976–2023) MA 6 (1919–2008) IA 3 (2021–2021) NH 2 (1978–1986) PA 2 (2014–2015) AL 2 (1983–1993) OR 2 (1953–1973)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance