12 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Terry v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Further, this Court has stated: Proportionality review "requires a discrete analysis of the facts," Terry v. State, 668 So.2d 954, 965 (Fla.1996), entailing a qualitative review by this Court of the underlying basis for each *533 aggravator and mitigator rather than a quantitative analysis. 2005In Urbin v. State, 714 So.2d 411 (Fla.1998), we explained our proportionality review: Proportionality review "requires a discrete analysis of the facts," Terry v. State, 668 So.2d 954, 965 (Fla.1996), entailing a qualitative review by this Court of the underlying basis for each aggravator and mitigator rather than a quantitative analysis. | 6 | 7 |
Urbin v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Urbin, 714 So.2d at 416 . 2005In Urbin v. State, 714 So.2d 411 (Fla.1998), we explained our proportionality review: Proportionality review "requires a discrete analysis of the facts," Terry v. State, 668 So.2d 954, 965 (Fla.1996), entailing a qualitative review by this Court of the underlying basis for each aggravator and mitigator rather than a quantitative analysis. | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tillman v. State
green
2 sentences2005We underscored this imperative in Tillman v. State, 591 So.2d 167 (Fla.1991): We have described the "proportionality review" conducted by this Court as follows: Because death is a unique punishment, it is necessary in each case to engage in a thoughtful, deliberate proportionality review to consider the totality of circumstances in a case, and to compare it with other capital cases. 2002We underscored this imperative in Tillman v. State, 591 So.2d 167 (Fla.1991): We have described the "proportionality review" conducted by this Court as follows: Because death is a unique punishment, it is necessary in each case to engage in a thoughtful, deliberate proportionality review to consider the totality of circumstances in a case, and to compare it with other capital cases. | 4 | 1998–2005 |
Johnson v. Levine
green
2 sentences2024The court said: We read section 44.103 to operate on discrete claims, so that the request of any one of two adverse parties to a discrete claim would be sufficient to require a trial de novo on that claim; but that the failure of all adverse parties to a separate and discrete claim within a multi-claim, multi-party lawsuit to request a trial do novo would not end up requiring an omnibus trial on all other claims against all parties. 20 Id. at 1240 . 2003Because neither Bath & Body Works nor the Morgans filed a motion for trial de novo, under the holdings of Venetoff, 732 So.2d 453 , and Johnson, 736 So.2d 1235 , the trial court properly entered judgment based upon the arbitrator's decision as to that cause of action. | 2 | 2003–2024 |
Venetoff v. Papas
green
1 sentence2003Because neither Bath & Body Works nor the Morgans filed a motion for trial de novo, under the holdings of Venetoff, 732 So.2d 453 , and Johnson, 736 So.2d 1235 , the trial court properly entered judgment based upon the arbitrator's decision as to that cause of action. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Porter v. State
green
1 sentence1996Porter, 564 So.2d at 1064 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Barragan v. City of Miami
green
1 sentence1995He seeks an "increase [in] the amount of workers' compensation to offset illegal deductions [from his pension benefits] made on the account of the payment of workers' compensation benefits." Barragan, 545 So.2d at 253 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.