Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Williams
green
2 sentences2009In Williams , this court explained that the Taylor rule resembles the doctrine of res judicata, but the rule is nonetheless "a discrete rule of Illinois procedure." Williams, 138 Ill.2d at 392 , 150 Ill.Dec. 498 , 563 N.E.2d 385 . 2009In Williams, this court explained that the Taylor rule resembles the doctrine of res judicata, but the rule is nonetheless “a discrete rule of Illinois procedure.” Williams, 138 Ill. 2d at 392 . | 4 | 2005–2009 |
Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co.
green
2 sentences2002In reaching this result, the court noted that: "The burden remains on the plaintiff to establish the elements of his cause of action, which here involved the discrete claim that the defendant wrongfully discharged plaintiff in retaliation for seeking recovery under the Workers' Compensation Act. * * * Other remedies may exist for the other violation, but the burden still rests on plaintiff to prove the elements of the action he has pleaded. " (Emphases added.) Clemons I, 184 Ill.2d at 336-37 , 235 Ill.Dec. 54 , 704 N.E.2d 403 . 2002In reaching this result, the court noted that: "The burden remains on the plaintiff to establish the elements of his cause of action, which here involved the discrete claim that the defendant wrongfully discharged plaintiff in retaliation for seeking recovery under the Workers' Compensation Act. * * * Other remedies may exist for the other violation, but the burden still rests on plaintiff to prove the elements of the action he has pleaded. " (Emphases added.) Clemons I, 184 Ill.2d at 336-37 , 235 Ill.Dec. 54 , 704 N.E.2d 403 . | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.