Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. Edwardsgreen2 sentences1997In Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. Edwards, 374 So.2d 490 (Fla.1979), the supreme court determined that a two-pronged test must be met in order to recover on an indemnity theory. 1996Houdaille Indus., Inc. v. Edwards, 374 So.2d 490, 492-93 (Fla.1979). | 1 | 2 |
Board of Trustees, Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund, etc. v. Curtis W. Leegreen1 sentence2024In other words, an accelerated civil action plays a critical role in the enforcement of the Public Records Act, as is reflected in the title of section 119.11—"Accelerated hearing; immediate compliance." Bd. of Trs., Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Lee, 189 So. 3d 120, 124 (Fla. 2016) (citation omitted) (quoting § 119.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2009)); see also art. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Howardgreen1 sentence2007See Ivory, 898 So.2d at 186 ; State v. Howard, 909 So.2d 390, 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (trial court granted Howard's motion to suppress because "the 14-inch `hairline crack' on the passenger's side of the windshield did not create a safety issue"). [10] In State v. Breed, 917 So.2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), although the Fifth District concluded that stopping the vehicle for a cracked windshield was valid, the court did not discuss the crack in any detail and instead focused on the length of the detention after the stop. | 1 | 1 |
Ivory v. Stategreen1 sentence2007See Ivory, 898 So.2d at 186 ; State v. Howard, 909 So.2d 390, 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (trial court granted Howard's motion to suppress because "the 14-inch `hairline crack' on the passenger's side of the windshield did not create a safety issue"). [10] In State v. Breed, 917 So.2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), although the Fifth District concluded that stopping the vehicle for a cracked windshield was valid, the court did not discuss the crack in any detail and instead focused on the length of the detention after the stop. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lerouxgreen1 sentence2004See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Bell v. State, 746 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McCray v. State
green
1 sentence2018Id. 2 In this case, Mr. Howard’s motion for severance is based on the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Arizona v. Gant
green
2 sentences2011But the search occurred — and the circuit court ruled on the motion to suppress— before the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Arizona v. Gant, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710 , 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009). 2011But the search occurred — and the circuit court ruled on the motion to suppress— before the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Arizona v. Gant, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710 , 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Breed
green
1 sentence2007See Ivory, 898 So.2d at 186 ; State v. Howard, 909 So.2d 390, 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (trial court granted Howard's motion to suppress because "the 14-inch `hairline crack' on the passenger's side of the windshield did not create a safety issue"). [10] In State v. Breed, 917 So.2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), although the Fifth District concluded that stopping the vehicle for a cracked windshield was valid, the court did not discuss the crack in any detail and instead focused on the length of the detention after the stop. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Becton v. State
green
1 sentence2005Id. at 1108 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Fleckinger v. State
green
1 sentence2004Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.300(b) provides in part that "[c]ounsel for both the state and defendant shall have the right to examine jurors orally on their *727 voir dire." In Melendez, 700 So.2d 791 , the Fourth District held: The court's failure to allow counsel to inquire into a prospective juror's potential biases amounts to an abuse of discretion warranting reversal unless it becomes "conclusively clear to the court after questioning, that there was no reasonable basis to anticipate that the juror could return a verdict against the defendant." Fleckinger v. State, 642 So.2d 35 (F | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Bell v. State
green
1 sentence2004See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Bell v. State, 746 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Melendez v. State
green
1 sentence2004Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.300(b) provides in part that "[c]ounsel for both the state and defendant shall have the right to examine jurors orally on their *727 voir dire." In Melendez, 700 So.2d 791 , the Fourth District held: The court's failure to allow counsel to inquire into a prospective juror's potential biases amounts to an abuse of discretion warranting reversal unless it becomes "conclusively clear to the court after questioning, that there was no reasonable basis to anticipate that the juror could return a verdict against the defendant." Fleckinger v. State, 642 So.2d 35 (F | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Gibbs v. Trudeau
green
1 sentence1998When she allowed her lawsuit against the estate to be dismissed for failure to prosecute, that dismissal was not an adjudication on the merits, see Gibbs v. Trudeau, 283 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), but it concluded the legal proceeding on her initial claim against the estate. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
United States v. Paul C. Perkins
green
1 sentence1991Perkins, 748 F.2d at 1533 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Snowden v. Sprouse
green
2 sentences1982Snowden v. Sprouse, 375 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). 1982Snowden v. Sprouse, 375 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.