Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. BOROVICHKAgreen1 sentence2025To the extent Howard raises a legality of sentence claim, we note that “[a] challenge to the legality of a sentence … may be entertained as long as the reviewing court has jurisdiction.” Commonwealth v. Borovichka, 18 A.3d 1242, 1254 (Pa. Super. 2011) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Com. v. Sandusky, G.green1 sentence2025“With respect to the PCRA court’s decision to deny a request for an evidentiary hearing or to hold a limited evidentiary hearing, such a decision is within the discretion of the PCRA court and will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.” Commonwealth v. Sandusky, 324 A.3d 551, 564 (Pa. Super. 2024) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Northeast Fence & Iron Works, Inc. v. Murphy Quigley Co.green1 sentence2018The only Pennsylvania case Howard cites to support its contention that the trial court -8- J-A02011-18 committed a procedural error is Northeast Fence & Iron Works, Inc. v. Murphy Quigley Co., 933 A.2d 664, 665 (Pa.Super. 2007). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Baumhammersgreen2 sentences2013See Commonwealth v. Baumhammers, 599 Pa. 1 , 960 A.2d 59, 73 (2008) (deeming claims of constitutional magnitude waived based on failure of capital defendant’s counsel to have raised them in argument before the trial court). 2013See Commonwealth v. Baumhammers, 599 Pa. 1 , 960 A.2d 59, 73 (2008) (deeming claims of constitutional magnitude waived based on failure of capital defendant’s counsel to have raised them in argument before the trial court). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Cookgreen2 sentences2013See id. at 13 (citing Commonwealth v. Spencer, 558 Pa. 50 , 735 A.2d 673, 677 (1999)) (reciting the legal threshold for investigative detention). 2013See id. at 13 (citing Commonwealth v. Spencer, 558 Pa. 50 , 735 A.2d 673, 677 (1999)) (reciting the legal threshold for investigative detention). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Berkheimergreen1 sentence2013See id. at 13 (citing Commonwealth v. Spencer, 558 Pa. 50 , 735 A.2d 673, 677 (1999)) (reciting the legal threshold for investigative detention). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washington
green
1 sentence2024Counsel identifies Howard’s claim that the victim has asserted his innocence as a newly discovered fact, 42 Pa.C.S.A. 9545(b)(1)(ii), and -4- J-S24027-24 Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), as a constitutional decision to be applied retroactively to his case, 42 Pa.C.S.A. 9545(b)(1)(iii). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Zieber v. Bogert
green
1 sentence2018Howard’s brief at 22 (citing Zieber, supra). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Petty
green
1 sentence2018In Commonwealth v. Petty, 157 A.3d 953 (Pa. Super. 2017), appeal denied, 169 A.3d 1070 (Pa. 2017), this Court addressed a similar situation. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Petty
green
1 sentence2018In Commonwealth v. Petty, 157 A.3d 953 (Pa. Super. 2017), appeal denied, 169 A.3d 1070 (Pa. 2017), this Court addressed a similar situation. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Moyer
green
1 sentence2017Suppression Hearing, 6/18/2105, at 30. 11 Commonwealth v. Moyer, 954 A.2d 659 (Pa. Super. 2008). -9- J-S27027-17 trial court’s order denying Howard’s motion to suppress evidence must be reversed, and Howard’s judgment of sentence must be vacated. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Rabutino v. Freedom State Realty Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence2016Rabutino v. Freedom State Realty Co., Inc., 809 A.2d 933 , 937 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2002) (stating that this Court has the power to quash an appeal if the brief violates the Rules of Appellate Procedure); see also Pa.R.A.P. 2101 (directs that briefs “shall conform in all material respects with the requirements of these rules as nearly as the circumstances of the particular case will admit, otherwise they may be suppressed, and, if the defects are in the brief … of the appellant and are substantial, the appeal or other matter may be quashed or dismissed”). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Smathers v. Smathers
green
1 sentence2016In response, we quote from Smathers v. Smathers, 670 A.2d 1159 (Pa. Super. 1996), wherein this Court explained: Nevertheless, this pro se representation does not relieve appellant of [his] duty to properly raise and develop [his] appealable claims. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Kentucky v. King
green
2 sentences2013In the recent ease of Kentucky v. King, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1849, 1862-63 , 179 L.Ed.2d 865 (2011), the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the question of “[u]nder what circumstances do police impermissibly create an exigency?” See id. at 1854 . 2013In the recent ease of Kentucky v. King, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1849, 1862-63 , 179 L.Ed.2d 865 (2011), the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the question of “[u]nder what circumstances do police impermissibly create an exigency?” See id. at 1854 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Commonwealth v. Lewis
green
2 sentences1998Indeed, in Howard’s brief on direct appeal, appellate counsel cited extensively to Commonwealth v. Lewis, 528 Pa. 440 , 598 A.2d 975 (1991), wherein this Court stated: The very premise underlying our requirement of the “no-adverse-inference” charge to the jury, under Article I, Section 9, is that the trial judge is vested with an obligation to protect the defendant’s right to remain silent, free from the insidious danger of adverse inference presented by a jury left free to wander in speculation. 1998Indeed, in Howard’s brief on direct appeal, appellate counsel cited extensively to Commonwealth v. Lewis, 528 Pa. 440 , 598 A.2d 975 (1991), wherein this Court stated: The very premise underlying our requirement of the “no-adverse-inference” charge to the jury, under Article I, Section 9, is that the trial judge is vested with an obligation to protect the defendant’s right to remain silent, free from the insidious danger of adverse inference presented by a jury left free to wander in speculation. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Commonwealth v. Howard
green
2 sentences1998In such- circumstances, the burden is not upon the Commonwealth to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the verdict; rather, the burden is upon the appellant to establish actual prejudice. 7 See Howard, 538 Pa. at 99-100 , 645 A.2d at 1307-08 . 1998In such- circumstances, the burden is not upon the Commonwealth to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the verdict; rather, the burden is upon the appellant to establish actual prejudice. 7 See Howard, 538 Pa. at 99-100 , 645 A.2d at 1307-08 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.