12 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1907–1987 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strong v. Stategreen2 sentences1985There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s failure to strike [these] prospective [jurors] for cause.’ [Cit.]” Strong v. State, 161 Ga. App. 606, 607 ( 288 SE2d 921 ) (1982). 5. 1985There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s failure to strike [these] prospective [jurors] for cause.’ [Cit.]” Strong v. State, 161 Ga. App. 606, 607 ( 288 SE2d 921 ) (1982). 5. | 1 | 1 |
Rosenblatt v. Baergreen2 sentences1982Appellee argues that, by virtue of appellant’s position as Dean of Savannah State College, he is a “public official” within the purview of the rule enunciated in New York Times Co., supra. In Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U. S. 75 at 85 (86 SC 669, 15 LE2d 597) (1966), while discussing the concept of “public officials,” the Court stated: “ [T]he ‘public official’ designation applies at the very least to those among the hierarchy of government employees who have, or appear to the public to have, substantial responsibility for or control over the conduct of governmental affairs.” The Court added: “Whe 1982Appellee argues that, by virtue of appellant’s position as Dean of Savannah State College, he is a “public official” within the purview of the rule enunciated in New York Times Co., supra. In Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U. S. 75 at 85 (86 SC 669, 15 LE2d 597) (1966), while discussing the concept of “public officials,” the Court stated: “ [T]he ‘public official’ designation applies at the very least to those among the hierarchy of government employees who have, or appear to the public to have, substantial responsibility for or control over the conduct of governmental affairs.” The Court added: “Whe | 1 | 1 |
Foster v. Stategreen2 sentences1982There was no *608 abuse of discretion in the trial court's failure to strike this prospective juror for cause." Foster v. State, 248 Ga. 409, 411 ( 283 SE2d 873 ) (1981). 5. 1982There was no *608 abuse of discretion in the trial court's failure to strike this prospective juror for cause." Foster v. State, 248 Ga. 409, 411 ( 283 SE2d 873 ) (1981). 5. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Knox v. Greenfield Estate
neutral
2 sentences1987“In Knox v. Greenfield Estate, 7 Ga. App. 305 ( 66 S.E. 805 ), it was said ‘A suit against a designated estate is not a suit *36 with a real defendant, within the purview of the rule just stated.’ Also: ‘A dead man can not be sued. 1987“In Knox v. Greenfield Estate, 7 Ga. App. 305 ( 66 S.E. 805 ), it was said ‘A suit against a designated estate is not a suit *36 with a real defendant, within the purview of the rule just stated.’ Also: ‘A dead man can not be sued. | 2 | 1936–1987 |
Young v. Harrison
neutral
1 sentence1963Neither Hard nor Young v. Harrison, 17 Ga. 30 (1), nor Gate City Terminal Co. v. Thrower, 136 Ga. 456 ( 71 SE 903 ), nor Housing Authority of the City of Marietta v. York, 106 Ga. App. 41 ( 126 SE2d 246 ), implies this possibility or goes so far. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Stricklin v. Brotherton
green
1 sentence1963Neither Hard nor Young v. Harrison, 17 Ga. 30 (1), nor Gate City Terminal Co. v. Thrower, 136 Ga. 456 ( 71 SE 903 ), nor Housing Authority of the City of Marietta v. York, 106 Ga. App. 41 ( 126 SE2d 246 ), implies this possibility or goes so far. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Gate City Terminal Co. v. Thrower
green
1 sentence1963Neither Hard nor Young v. Harrison, 17 Ga. 30 (1), nor Gate City Terminal Co. v. Thrower, 136 Ga. 456 ( 71 SE 903 ), nor Housing Authority of the City of Marietta v. York, 106 Ga. App. 41 ( 126 SE2d 246 ), implies this possibility or goes so far. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Hard v. Housing Authority of Atlanta
green
2 sentences1963Such a result is not within the purview of the rule considered in Hard v. Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, 219 Ga. 74 ( 132 SE2d 25 ). 1963Such a result is not within the purview of the rule considered in Hard v. Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, 219 Ga. 74 ( 132 SE2d 25 ). | 1 | 1963–1963 |
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MARIETTA v. York
neutral
2 sentences1963Neither Hard nor Young v. Harrison, 17 Ga. 30 (1), nor Gate City Terminal Co. v. Thrower, 136 Ga. 456 ( 71 SE 903 ), nor Housing Authority of the City of Marietta v. York, 106 Ga. App. 41 ( 126 SE2d 246 ), implies this possibility or goes so far. 1963Neither Hard nor Young v. Harrison, 17 Ga. 30 (1), nor Gate City Terminal Co. v. Thrower, 136 Ga. 456 ( 71 SE 903 ), nor Housing Authority of the City of Marietta v. York, 106 Ga. App. 41 ( 126 SE2d 246 ), implies this possibility or goes so far. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Bacon v. State
green
2 sentences1956The incidental fact that in asserting such right of possession he committed another offense, that of pointing a pistol at another, does not bring this transaction within the purview of the rule restated in Bacon v. State, 209 Ga. 261 ( 71 S. E. 2d 615 ), which renders inadmissible offenses wholly independent, separate and distinct, where there is no logical connection between them and the case on trial. 1956The incidental fact that in asserting such right of possession he committed another offense, that of pointing a pistol at another, does not bring this transaction within the purview of the rule restated in Bacon v. State, 209 Ga. 261 ( 71 S. E. 2d 615 ), which renders inadmissible offenses wholly independent, separate and distinct, where there is no logical connection between them and the case on trial. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Hubert v. Harpe
green
2 sentences1954If the driver of the automobile is a member of the owner’s family and otherwise within the purview of the rule, it does not matter that he is a non-dependent, self-supporting son (Hubert v. Harpe, 181 Ga. 168 , 182 S. E. 167 ), or that the son lives a part of the time away from home (Lacey v. Forehand, 27 Ga. App. 344 , 108 S. E. 247 ). 1954If the driver of the automobile is a member of the owner’s family and otherwise within the purview of the rule, it does not matter that he is a non-dependent, self-supporting son (Hubert v. Harpe, 181 Ga. 168 , 182 S. E. 167 ), or that the son lives a part of the time away from home (Lacey v. Forehand, 27 Ga. App. 344 , 108 S. E. 247 ). | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Davis v. Mesler
green
1 sentence1954If the driver of the automobile is a member of the owner’s family and otherwise within the purview of the rule, it does not matter that he is a non-dependent, self-supporting son (Hubert v. Harpe, 181 Ga. 168 , 182 S. E. 167 ), or that the son lives a part of the time away from home (Lacey v. Forehand, 27 Ga. App. 344 , 108 S. E. 247 ). | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Lacey v. Forehand
green
1 sentence1954If the driver of the automobile is a member of the owner’s family and otherwise within the purview of the rule, it does not matter that he is a non-dependent, self-supporting son (Hubert v. Harpe, 181 Ga. 168 , 182 S. E. 167 ), or that the son lives a part of the time away from home (Lacey v. Forehand, 27 Ga. App. 344 , 108 S. E. 247 ). | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
green
2 sentences1937Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., 30 Ga. App. 462 ( 118 S. E. 694 ). 1937Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., 30 Ga. App. 462 ( 118 S. E. 694 ). | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Butler v. Lewman & Co.
green
2 sentences1911Such a case was that of Butler v. Lewman, 115 Ga. 752 ( 42 S. E. 98 ). 1911Such a case was that of Butler v. Lewman, 115 Ga. 752 ( 42 S. E. 98 ). | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Moore v. Dublin Cotton Mills
green
1 sentence1907The question is fully discussed and plainly decided in Moore v. Dublin Cotton Mills, 127 Ga. 609 , and elaboration on our part is unnecessary. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Field v. Howry
neutral
1 sentence1907Field v. Hawry, 132 Mich. 687 . | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.