Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1896–1954 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Elkhorn Valley Bank v. Marleygreen1 sentence1907See Secord v. Powers, 61 Neb. 615 ( 85 N. W. 846 , 87 Am. | 1 | 1 |
Secord v. Powersgreen1 sentence1907See Secord v. Powers, 61 Neb. 615 ( 85 N. W. 846 , 87 Am. | 1 | 1 |
Hoxie v. Chaneygreen1 sentence1896See Hoxie v. Chaney, 143 Mass. 592 (10 N. E. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hepburn & Dundas v. Auld
green
1 sentence1954In an early leading case on the subject, Hepburn v. Auld, 5 Cranch (U. S.) 262, 277, 3 L. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Heirs of Enfield v. Hanson
green
2 sentences1940This seems to be the rule announced in In re Estate of Enfield, 217 Iowa 273 , 251 N. W. 637 ; In re Estate of Foster, 218 Iowa 1202 , 256 N. W. 744 ; and in In re Estate of Rorick, 218 Iowa 107 , 253 N. W. 916 . 1940This seems to be the rule announced in In re Estate of Enfield, 217 Iowa 273 , 251 N. W. 637 ; In re Estate of Foster, 218 Iowa 1202 , 256 N. W. 744 ; and in In re Estate of Rorick, 218 Iowa 107 , 253 N. W. 916 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
In Re Estate of Foster
neutral
2 sentences1940This seems to be the rule announced in In re Estate of Enfield, 217 Iowa 273 , 251 N. W. 637 ; In re Estate of Foster, 218 Iowa 1202 , 256 N. W. 744 ; and in In re Estate of Rorick, 218 Iowa 107 , 253 N. W. 916 . 1940This seems to be the rule announced in In re Estate of Enfield, 217 Iowa 273 , 251 N. W. 637 ; In re Estate of Foster, 218 Iowa 1202 , 256 N. W. 744 ; and in In re Estate of Rorick, 218 Iowa 107 , 253 N. W. 916 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
In Re Estate of Rorick
green
2 sentences1940This seems to be the rule announced in In re Estate of Enfield, 217 Iowa 273 , 251 N. W. 637 ; In re Estate of Foster, 218 Iowa 1202 , 256 N. W. 744 ; and in In re Estate of Rorick, 218 Iowa 107 , 253 N. W. 916 . 1940This seems to be the rule announced in In re Estate of Enfield, 217 Iowa 273 , 251 N. W. 637 ; In re Estate of Foster, 218 Iowa 1202 , 256 N. W. 744 ; and in In re Estate of Rorick, 218 Iowa 107 , 253 N. W. 916 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Eggleston v. Council Bluffs Insurance
neutral
2 sentences1938White v. Home Mutual Insurance Association, 189 Iowa 1051 , 179 N. W. 315 ; Eggleston v. Insurance Company, 65 Iowa 308 , 21 N. W. 652 ; Douglas v. Insurance Company of North America, 215 Mich. 529 , 184 N. W. 539 ; St. 1938White v. Home Mutual Insurance Association, 189 Iowa 1051 , 179 N. W. 315 ; Eggleston v. Insurance Company, 65 Iowa 308 , 21 N. W. 652 ; Douglas v. Insurance Company of North America, 215 Mich. 529 , 184 N. W. 539 ; St. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
White v. Home Mutual Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1938White v. Home Mutual Insurance Association, 189 Iowa 1051 , 179 N. W. 315 ; Eggleston v. Insurance Company, 65 Iowa 308 , 21 N. W. 652 ; Douglas v. Insurance Company of North America, 215 Mich. 529 , 184 N. W. 539 ; St. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Douglas v. Insurance Co. of North America
green
2 sentences1938White v. Home Mutual Insurance Association, 189 Iowa 1051 , 179 N. W. 315 ; Eggleston v. Insurance Company, 65 Iowa 308 , 21 N. W. 652 ; Douglas v. Insurance Company of North America, 215 Mich. 529 , 184 N. W. 539 ; St. 1938White v. Home Mutual Insurance Association, 189 Iowa 1051 , 179 N. W. 315 ; Eggleston v. Insurance Company, 65 Iowa 308 , 21 N. W. 652 ; Douglas v. Insurance Company of North America, 215 Mich. 529 , 184 N. W. 539 ; St. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
In re Estate of Lyon
neutral
1 sentence1931This seems to be a rule to which the Iowa court is fully committed, as shown by the following cases: In re estate of Lyon, 70 Iowa 375 ; McCormick v. Hanks, 105 Iowa 639 ; Spaan v. Anderson, 115 Iowa 121 ; In re Estate of Cummings, 120 Iowa 421 ; Gilmore v. Jenkins, 129 Iowa 686 ; In re Estate Hall, 132 Iowa 664 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Spaan v. Anderson
neutral
1 sentence1931This seems to be a rule to which the Iowa court is fully committed, as shown by the following cases: In re estate of Lyon, 70 Iowa 375 ; McCormick v. Hanks, 105 Iowa 639 ; Spaan v. Anderson, 115 Iowa 121 ; In re Estate of Cummings, 120 Iowa 421 ; Gilmore v. Jenkins, 129 Iowa 686 ; In re Estate Hall, 132 Iowa 664 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
McCormick v. Hanks
neutral
1 sentence1931This seems to be a rule to which the Iowa court is fully committed, as shown by the following cases: In re estate of Lyon, 70 Iowa 375 ; McCormick v. Hanks, 105 Iowa 639 ; Spaan v. Anderson, 115 Iowa 121 ; In re Estate of Cummings, 120 Iowa 421 ; Gilmore v. Jenkins, 129 Iowa 686 ; In re Estate Hall, 132 Iowa 664 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
In re Estate of Cummings
neutral
1 sentence1931This seems to be a rule to which the Iowa court is fully committed, as shown by the following cases: In re estate of Lyon, 70 Iowa 375 ; McCormick v. Hanks, 105 Iowa 639 ; Spaan v. Anderson, 115 Iowa 121 ; In re Estate of Cummings, 120 Iowa 421 ; Gilmore v. Jenkins, 129 Iowa 686 ; In re Estate Hall, 132 Iowa 664 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Gilmore v. Jenkins
green
1 sentence1931This seems to be a rule to which the Iowa court is fully committed, as shown by the following cases: In re estate of Lyon, 70 Iowa 375 ; McCormick v. Hanks, 105 Iowa 639 ; Spaan v. Anderson, 115 Iowa 121 ; In re Estate of Cummings, 120 Iowa 421 ; Gilmore v. Jenkins, 129 Iowa 686 ; In re Estate Hall, 132 Iowa 664 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Hall v. Hall
green
1 sentence1931This seems to be a rule to which the Iowa court is fully committed, as shown by the following cases: In re estate of Lyon, 70 Iowa 375 ; McCormick v. Hanks, 105 Iowa 639 ; Spaan v. Anderson, 115 Iowa 121 ; In re Estate of Cummings, 120 Iowa 421 ; Gilmore v. Jenkins, 129 Iowa 686 ; In re Estate Hall, 132 Iowa 664 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Pleyte v. Pleyte
neutral
1 sentence1912Cralle v. Cralle, 81 Va. 773 ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 91 Ill. 167 ; State v. Phillips, 32 Fla. 403 ( 13 South. 920 ); Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 6 Mich. 285 ; Pleyte v. Pleyte, 15 Colo. 125 ( 25 Pac. 25 ); Coad v. Coad, 40 Wis. 392 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Coad v. Coad
neutral
1 sentence1912Cralle v. Cralle, 81 Va. 773 ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 91 Ill. 167 ; State v. Phillips, 32 Fla. 403 ( 13 South. 920 ); Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 6 Mich. 285 ; Pleyte v. Pleyte, 15 Colo. 125 ( 25 Pac. 25 ); Coad v. Coad, 40 Wis. 392 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Goldsmith v. Goldsmith
neutral
1 sentence1912Cralle v. Cralle, 81 Va. 773 ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 91 Ill. 167 ; State v. Phillips, 32 Fla. 403 ( 13 South. 920 ); Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 6 Mich. 285 ; Pleyte v. Pleyte, 15 Colo. 125 ( 25 Pac. 25 ); Coad v. Coad, 40 Wis. 392 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Jenkins v. Jenkins
neutral
1 sentence1912Cralle v. Cralle, 81 Va. 773 ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 91 Ill. 167 ; State v. Phillips, 32 Fla. 403 ( 13 South. 920 ); Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 6 Mich. 285 ; Pleyte v. Pleyte, 15 Colo. 125 ( 25 Pac. 25 ); Coad v. Coad, 40 Wis. 392 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Cralle v. Cralle
green
1 sentence1912Cralle v. Cralle, 81 Va. 773 ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 91 Ill. 167 ; State v. Phillips, 32 Fla. 403 ( 13 South. 920 ); Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 6 Mich. 285 ; Pleyte v. Pleyte, 15 Colo. 125 ( 25 Pac. 25 ); Coad v. Coad, 40 Wis. 392 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
State ex rel. Shrader v. Phillips
neutral
1 sentence1912Cralle v. Cralle, 81 Va. 773 ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 91 Ill. 167 ; State v. Phillips, 32 Fla. 403 ( 13 South. 920 ); Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 6 Mich. 285 ; Pleyte v. Pleyte, 15 Colo. 125 ( 25 Pac. 25 ); Coad v. Coad, 40 Wis. 392 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Bardsley v. Hines
neutral
1 sentence1910Littlejohn v. Bulles, 136 Iowa, 150 ; Bardsley v. Hines, 33 Iowa, 157 . | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Littlejohn v. Bulles
neutral
1 sentence1910Littlejohn v. Bulles, 136 Iowa, 150 ; Bardsley v. Hines, 33 Iowa, 157 . | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Kane v. Parker
neutral
1 sentence1908Kane v. Parker, 4 Wis. 123 ; 17 Am. & Eng. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Hargis v. Robinson
neutral
2 sentences1904Hargis v. Robinson, 63 Kan. 686 ( 66 Pac. 1904Hargis v. Robinson, 63 Kan. 686 ( 66 Pac. | 1 | 1904–1904 |
McCarthy v. Trumacher
neutral
1 sentence1902This seems to be the rule in some states, but we have not as yet adopted it in this jurisdiction, See McCarthy v. Trumacher, 108 Iowa, 284 . | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Figge v. Hill
neutral
1 sentence1897It is contended by appellants that, in order to constitute a warranty .because of an affirmation of quality, on which the buyer relies, it must appear that the parties, including the seller, intended a warranty; and this seems to be the rule as. stated in Figge v. Hill, 61 Iowa, 430 , and other cases. | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.