Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Steed v. GRAND TETON COUNCILgreen2 sentences2023Brian & Christie, Inc. v. Leishman Elec., Inc., 150 Idaho 22 , 25 n.1, 244 P.3d 166 , 169 n.1 (2010); see also Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 144 Idaho 848, 853 , 172 P.3d 1123, 1128 (2007) (“Negligence per se is simply one manner of proving a common law negligence claim.”). 2015“Negligence per se is simply one manner of proving a common law negligence claim.” Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 144 Idaho 848, 853 , 172 P.3d 1123, 1128 (2007). “[I]n Idaho, it is well established that statutes and administrative regulations may define the applicable standard of care owed, and that violations of such statutes and regulations may constitute negligence per se.” Sanchez v. Galey, 112 Idaho 609, 617 , 733 P.2d 1234, 1242 (1986). | 3 | 3 |
Woodworth v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Transportation Boardgreen2 sentences2025Id. at 363, 365 , 298 P.3d at 1067, 1069 . 2025Id. at 363, 365 , 298 P.3d at 1067, 1069 . | 2 | 2 |
Sanchez v. Galeygreen2 sentences2015“Negligence per se is simply one manner of proving a common law negligence claim.” Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 144 Idaho 848, 853 , 172 P.3d 1123, 1128 (2007). “[I]n Idaho, it is well established that statutes and administrative regulations may define the applicable standard of care owed, and that violations of such statutes and regulations may constitute negligence per se.” Sanchez v. Galey, 112 Idaho 609, 617 , 733 P.2d 1234, 1242 (1986). 2015“Negligence per se is simply one manner of proving a common law negligence claim.” Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 144 Idaho 848, 853 , 172 P.3d 1123, 1128 (2007). “[I]n Idaho, it is well established that statutes and administrative regulations may define the applicable standard of care owed, and that violations of such statutes and regulations may constitute negligence per se.” Sanchez v. Galey, 112 Idaho 609, 617 , 733 P.2d 1234, 1242 (1986). | 2 | 2 |
Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of America, Inc.green2 sentences2023Brian & Christie, Inc. v. Leishman Elec., Inc., 150 Idaho 22 , 25 n.1, 244 P.3d 166 , 169 n.1 (2010); see also Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 144 Idaho 848, 853 , 172 P.3d 1123, 1128 (2007) (“Negligence per se is simply one manner of proving a common law negligence claim.”). 2015“Negligence per se is simply one manner of proving a common law negligence claim.” Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 144 Idaho 848, 853 , 172 P.3d 1123, 1128 (2007). “[I]n Idaho, it is well established that statutes and administrative regulations may define the applicable standard of care owed, and that violations of such statutes and regulations may constitute negligence per se.” Sanchez v. Galey, 112 Idaho 609, 617 , 733 P.2d 1234, 1242 (1986). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fell v. Fat Smitty's
green
2 sentences2021Id. 2021Id. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Ahles v. Tabor
green
2 sentences2007Ahles v. Tabor, 136 Idaho 393 , 34 P.3d 1076 (2001). 2007Ahles v. Tabor, 136 Idaho 393 , 34 P.3d 1076 (2001). | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Brian & Christie, Inc. v. Leishman Electric, Inc.
green
2 sentences2023Brian & Christie, Inc. v. Leishman Elec., Inc., 150 Idaho 22 , 25 n.1, 244 P.3d 166 , 169 n.1 (2010); see also Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 144 Idaho 848, 853 , 172 P.3d 1123, 1128 (2007) (“Negligence per se is simply one manner of proving a common law negligence claim.”). 2023Brian & Christie, Inc. v. Leishman Elec., Inc., 150 Idaho 22 , 25 n.1, 244 P.3d 166 , 169 n.1 (2010); see also Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 144 Idaho 848, 853 , 172 P.3d 1123, 1128 (2007) (“Negligence per se is simply one manner of proving a common law negligence claim.”). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
McGill v. Frasure
green
2 sentences2020In McGill, the plaintiff was a patron of Garfield’s bar in Pocatello when another patron physically assaulted her. 117 Idaho at 599 , 790 P.2d at 380 . 2020In McGill, the plaintiff was a patron of Garfield’s bar in Pocatello when another patron physically assaulted her. 117 Idaho at 599 , 790 P.2d at 380 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Seth Griffith v. Jumptime, Meridian
green
2 sentences2018The elements of a common law negligence claim are "(1) a duty, recognized by law, requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of conduct; (2) a breach of that duty; (3) a causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual loss or damage." Griffith v. JumpTime Meridian, LLC , 161 Idaho 913 , 915, 393 P.3d 573 , 575 (2017) (internal quotations and citation omitted). 2018The elements of a common law negligence claim are "(1) a duty, recognized by law, requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of conduct; (2) a breach of that duty; (3) a causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual loss or damage." Griffith v. JumpTime Meridian, LLC , 161 Idaho 913 , 915, 393 P.3d 573 , 575 (2017) (internal quotations and citation omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
O'GUIN v. Bingham County
green
2 sentences2005This Court also affirmed the summary judgment entered against the O'Guins on the common law negligence claim because the complaint "[did] not allege any willful or wanton conduct by the County [nor a] breach of the duty owed to a trespasser." Id. at 15 , 72 P.3d at 855 . 2005This Court also affirmed the summary judgment entered against the O'Guins on the common law negligence claim because the complaint "[did] not allege any willful or wanton conduct by the County [nor a] breach of the duty owed to a trespasser." Id. at 15 , 72 P.3d at 855 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.