Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. Stevensongreen2 sentences2020Mitchell v. Stevenson, 677 N.E.2d 551, 558-59 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997), trans. denied. 1999“A civil contempt is a violation of a court order resulting in a proceeding for the benefit of the aggrieved party.” Mitchell v. Stevenson (1997) Ind.App., 677 N.E.2d 551, 560 , trans. denied. | 3 | 5 |
Duemling v. Fort Wayne Community Concerts, Inc.green2 sentences1978Since attorney’s fees are not properly includable as damages in the absence of a statute or a contract allowing such, 3 then we must hold that the court erred in requiring Jimmie to pay the attorney’s fees which Shirley incurred in filing her petition for' bankruptcy.* *3 4 In Duemling v. Fort Wayne Community Concerts, Inc. (1963), 243 Ind. 521, 524-525 , 188 N.E.2d 274 , our Supreme Court stated: “A civil contempt is a violation of a court order which results in a proceeding for the benefit of the aggrieved party. 1978Since attorney’s fees are not properly includable as damages in the absence of a statute or a contract allowing such, 3 then we must hold that the court erred in requiring Jimmie to pay the attorney’s fees which Shirley incurred in filing her petition for' bankruptcy.* *3 4 In Duemling v. Fort Wayne Community Concerts, Inc. (1963), 243 Ind. 521, 524-525 , 188 N.E.2d 274 , our Supreme Court stated: “A civil contempt is a violation of a court order which results in a proceeding for the benefit of the aggrieved party. | 1 | 3 |
Denny v. State Ex Inf. Bradygreen1 sentence1986Duemling, 243 Ind. at 524 , 188 N.E.2d at 276 ; McMinn, 229 Ind. at 619 , 100 N.E.2d at 678 ; Denny, 203 Ind. at 698, 707 , 182 N.E. at 318, 321 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2018Id. 2014Id. | 3 | 2013–2018 |
In Re Paternity of NT
green
1 sentence2014A civil contempt is a violation of a court order resulting in a proceeding for the benefit of the aggrieved party.” In re Paternity of N.T., 961 N.E.2d 1020 , 1022 n. 2 (Ind.Ct.App.2012). 2 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State Ex Rel. McMinn v. Gentry
green
2 sentences1986Duemling, 243 Ind. at 524 , 188 N.E.2d at 276 ; McMinn, 229 Ind. at 619 , 100 N.E.2d at 678 ; Denny, 203 Ind. at 698, 707 , 182 N.E. at 318, 321 . 1986Duemling, 243 Ind. at 524 , 188 N.E.2d at 276 ; McMinn, 229 Ind. at 619 , 100 N.E.2d at 678 ; Denny, 203 Ind. at 698, 707 , 182 N.E. at 318, 321 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.