Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Smith-Parkergreen2 sentences2018Knox, 301 Kan. at 677 ; see State v. Smith-Parker, 301 Kan. 132, 161 , 340 P.3d 485 (2014) ("The burden of demonstrating error is on the party alleging the abuse."). 2018Knox, 301 Kan. at 677 ; see State v. Smith-Parker, 301 Kan. 132, 161 , 340 P.3d 485 (2014) ("The burden of demonstrating error is on the party alleging the abuse."). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Taguegreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., State v. Tague, 296 Kan. 993, 1005 , 298 P.3d 273 (2013) (burden is on party asserting error to establish trial judge abused discretion in limiting cross-examination). 2015See, e.g., State v. Tague, 296 Kan. 993, 1005 , 298 P.3d 273 (2013) (burden is on party asserting error to establish trial judge abused discretion in limiting cross-examination). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2016See Robinson, 303 Kan. at 219 ("While K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 21-6619[b] compels our review of all issues briefed on appeal, it does 'not require that we treat the record other than as it is presented to us.' We thus consider this challenge based on the status of the record presented on appeal and mindful of the fact that Robinson, as the party alleging error, bears the burden of demonstrating error.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Burnett
green
2 sentences2018State v. Burnett , 300 Kan. 419 , 449, 329 P.3d 1169 (2014). 2018State v. Burnett , 300 Kan. 419 , 449, 329 P.3d 1169 (2014). | 2 | 2014–2018 |
State v. Knox
green
2 sentences2018Knox, 301 Kan. at 677 ; see State v. Smith-Parker, 301 Kan. 132, 161 , 340 P.3d 485 (2014) ("The burden of demonstrating error is on the party alleging the abuse."). 2018Knox, 301 Kan. at 677 ; see State v. Smith-Parker, 301 Kan. 132, 161 , 340 P.3d 485 (2014) ("The burden of demonstrating error is on the party alleging the abuse."). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Bolze-Sann
green
2 sentences2018"While the district court has a duty to instruct the jury on the law that applies in a particular case, a district court does not have to provide the jury a definition for widely used words or those readily comprehensible by individuals of common intelligence." Bolze-Sann, 302 Kan. at 210 . 2018"While the district court has a duty to instruct the jury on the law that applies in a particular case, a district court does not have to provide the jury a definition for widely used words or those readily comprehensible by individuals of common intelligence." Bolze-Sann, 302 Kan. at 210 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Hulett
green
2 sentences2014State v. Hulett, 293 Kan. 312, 318 , 263 P.3d 153 (2011); State v. White, 284 Kan. 333, 342 , 161 P.3d 208 (2007). 2014State v. Hulett, 293 Kan. 312, 318 , 263 P.3d 153 (2011); State v. White, 284 Kan. 333, 342 , 161 P.3d 208 (2007). | 2 | 2013–2014 |
State v. White
green
2 sentences2014State v. Hulett, 293 Kan. 312, 318 , 263 P.3d 153 (2011); State v. White, 284 Kan. 333, 342 , 161 P.3d 208 (2007). 2014State v. Hulett, 293 Kan. 312, 318 , 263 P.3d 153 (2011); State v. White, 284 Kan. 333, 342 , 161 P.3d 208 (2007). | 2 | 2013–2014 |
State v. Keys
green
1 sentence2025State v. Keys, 315 Kan. 690 , 708, 510 P.3d 706 (2022). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. McCullough
green
1 sentence2023As the party benefitting from the presumed admissibility error, the State bears the burden of demonstrating the error did not affect the outcome. 293 Kan. at 982-83 . 15 Preservation As a threshold matter, the State suggests that Cupp may not have properly preserved this issue for appeal. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Wells
green
2 sentences2014State v. Wells, 297 Kan. 741, 754 , 305 P.3d 568 (2013). 2014State v. Wells, 297 Kan. 741, 754 , 305 P.3d 568 (2013). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Osborn v. Lesser
green
2 sentences2012In one early civil case, our court simply declared without citation to any authority that “[i]t is elemental that one seeking reversal of a judgment because of exclusion of evidence has the burden of demonstrating error, as well as prejudice, in the ruling complained of.” Osborn v. Lesser, 201 Kan. 45, 47 , 439 P.2d 395 (1968). 2012In one early civil case, our court simply declared without citation to any authority that “[i]t is elemental that one seeking reversal of a judgment because of exclusion of evidence has the burden of demonstrating error, as well as prejudice, in the ruling complained of.” Osborn v. Lesser, 201 Kan. 45, 47 , 439 P.2d 395 (1968). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.