Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Old Second National Bank v. Indiana Insurance Companygreen2 sentences2017Old Second, 2015 IL App (1st) 140265, ¶ 22 (the insurer bears the burden of demonstrating a claim falls within a provision that limits or excludes coverage) (citing Farmers Automobile Insurance Ass’n. v. Gitelson, 344 Ill. 2017Old Second, 2015 IL App (1st) 140265, ¶ 22 (the insurer bears the burden of demonstrating a claim falls within a provision that limits or excludes coverage) (citing Farmers Automobile Insurance Ass’n v. Gitelson, 344 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Farmers Automobile Insurance v. Gitelsongreen2 sentences2017Old Second, 2015 IL App (1st) 140265, ¶ 22 (the insurer bears the burden of demonstrating a claim falls within a provision that limits or excludes coverage) (citing Farmers Automobile Insurance Ass’n. v. Gitelson, 344 Ill. 2017Old Second, 2015 IL App (1st) 140265, ¶ 22 (the insurer bears the burden of demonstrating a claim falls within a provision that limits or excludes coverage) (citing Farmers Automobile Insurance Ass’n v. Gitelson, 344 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Central Illinois Light Co. v. Home Insurancegreen2 sentences2017App. 3d 888, 896 (2003)). ¶ 30 Furthermore, the plain language of the mortgage clause requires that GMACM notify plaintiff “of any change in ownership, occupancy or substantial change in risk of which the 13 1-15-1835 mortgagee is aware.” See Central Illinois Light Co., 213 Ill. 2d at 153 (where the words of an insurance policy are clear and ambiguous, they must be given their plain and ordinary meaning). 2017App. 3d 888, 896 (2003)). ¶ 30 Furthermore, the plain language of the mortgage clause requires that GMACM notify plaintiff “of any change in ownership, occupancy or substantial change in risk of which the mortgagee is aware.” See Central Illinois Light Co., 213 Ill. 2d at 153 (where the words of an insurance policy are clear and ambiguous, they must be given their plain and ordinary meaning). | 2 | 2 |
Cload v. Westgreen2 sentences2016Oshana v. FCL Builders, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120851, ¶ 15 (citing Cload v. West, 328 Ill. 2016Oshana v. FCL Builders, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120851, ¶ 15 (citing Cload v. West, 328 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Oshana v. FCL Builders, Inc.green2 sentences2016Oshana v. FCL Builders, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120851, ¶ 15 (citing Cload v. West, 328 Ill. 2016Oshana v. FCL Builders, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120851, ¶ 15 (citing Cload v. West, 328 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Forman v. Richmond Police Department
green
2 sentences1999Forman, 104 F.3d at 957-58 . 1999Forman , 104 F.3d at 957-58 . | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.