Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tucker v. Nicholsgreen2 sentences2007Further, the Fogarty opinion stated that the omission of such an argument constitutes the "waiv[er of] the right to assert error with respect to that issue." 953 So.2d at 1232. [23] In Tucker v. Nichols, supra, this Court explained the basis of the rule that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating error on the record: "This rule is premised upon the fundamental proposition that an appellate court will not presume error and will affirm the judgment appealed from if supported on any valid legal ground." 431 So.2d at 1265 . 2007Further, the Fogarty opinion stated that the omission of such an argument constitutes the "waiv[er of] the right to assert error with respect to that issue." 953 So.2d at 1232. [23] In Tucker v. Nichols, supra, this Court explained the basis of the rule that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating error on the record: "This rule is premised upon the fundamental proposition that an appellate court will not presume error and will affirm the judgment appealed from if supported on any valid legal ground." 431 So.2d at 1265 . | 1 | 2 |
Soutullo v. Mobile Countygreen1 sentence2016Sou-tullo v. Mobile Cty., 58 So.3d 733, 738 (Ala.2010) (quoting Tucker v. Nichols, 431 So.2d 1263, 1264 (Ala.1983)) (“In order to secure a reversal, ‘the appellant has an affirmative duty of showing error upon the record.’ ”). | 1 | 1 |
Nue Cheer Franklin v. Woodmere at the Lake.green1 sentence2014Franklin v. Woodmere at the Lake, 89 So.3d 144, 150 (Ala.Civ.App.2011). | 1 | 1 |
COASTAL RLTY. & MORTG., INC. v. First Ala. Bank, NAgreen1 sentence2013Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. v. JBJ P’ship, 979 So.2d 24, 39 (Ala.2007); Coastal Realty & Mortg., Inc. v. First Alabama Bank, N.A., 424 So.2d 1315, 1317 (Ala.Civ.App.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Pavilion Development v. Jbj Partnershipgreen1 sentence2013Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. v. JBJ P’ship, 979 So.2d 24, 39 (Ala.2007); Coastal Realty & Mortg., Inc. v. First Alabama Bank, N.A., 424 So.2d 1315, 1317 (Ala.Civ.App.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte CTB, Inc.green1 sentence2007We have sometimes phrased this rule in language suggesting that it "must" be applied, see Ex parte CTB, Inc., 782 So.2d 188, 191 (Ala.2000) ("[T]his Court must affirm the judgment of the trial court if that judgment is supported by any valid legal ground, even if that ground was not argued before the trial court or this Court."), while at other times we have stated it in language suggesting that the rule "may" be applied, see Unum Life Ins. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pace v. State
green
2 sentences1980Pace v. State , 284 Ala. 585 , 226 So.2d 645 ; Snipes v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 364 So.2d 424 . *Page 399 The record revealed the trial court was aware that the Birmingham Police Department was participating in the city employees' strike. 1980Pace v. State , 284 Ala. 585 , 226 So.2d 645 ; Snipes v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 364 So.2d 424 . *Page 399 The record revealed the trial court was aware that the Birmingham Police Department was participating in the city employees' strike. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Snipes v. State
green
1 sentence1980Pace v. State , 284 Ala. 585 , 226 So.2d 645 ; Snipes v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 364 So.2d 424 . *Page 399 The record revealed the trial court was aware that the Birmingham Police Department was participating in the city employees' strike. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.