12 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Connergreen2 sentences2025In the Matter of Conner & Conner, 156 N.H. at 252 . [¶14] The Right-to-Know Law requires the necessary accommodation of competing interests. 2024Id. | 1 | 9 |
State v. Russellgreen1 sentence2016Under the third prong, evidence of other, uncharged bad acts “is admissible if the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant does not substantially outweigh the probative value of the evidence.” Russell, 159 N.H. at 485 (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lambertgreen1 sentence2007See Lambert, 147 N.H. at 296 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Buzzard v. F.F. Enterprises
green
1 sentence2019Id. 2 Although, in his brief, the plaintiff represents that he would have argued in his objection to the motion to dismiss that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled, his motion for additional time did not say this. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Smalley
green
1 sentence2016Cf. Smalley, 151 N.H. at 196 . *500 The defendant next argues that the court erred in its analysis under the third prong of Rule 404(b). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.