Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dupler v. Mansfield Journal Co.green2 sentences2025Dupler v. Mansfield Journal Co., 64 Ohio St.2d 116, 121 [ 413 N.E.2d 1187 ] (1980). 2025Dupler v. Mansfield Journal Co., 64 Ohio St.2d 116, 121 [ 413 N.E.2d 1187 ] (1980). | 1 | 1 |
Blood v. Nofzingergreen2 sentences2018See R.C. 1336.04(B)(8); Blood v. Nofzinger, 162 Ohio App.3d 545 , 2005-Ohio-3859 , 834 N.E.2d 358, ¶ 50 (6th Dist.). {¶14} The fraudulent transfer act has no application to this case. 2018See R.C. 1336.04(B)(8); Blood v. Nofzinger, 162 Ohio App.3d 545 , 2005-Ohio-3859 , 834 N.E.2d 358, ¶ 50 (6th Dist.). {¶14} The fraudulent transfer act has no application to this case. | 1 | 1 |
Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.green2 sentences2011Co. (N.D.Ill.1990), 123 B.R. 277, 285 ; Hays & Co., 885 F.2d at 1155 (nonsignatory liquidator could be compelled to arbitrate claims that were derivative of the debtor but not a fraudulent-transfer claim brought on behalf of the debtor’s creditors); Amcomp Preferred Ins. 2011Co. (N.D.Ill.1990), 123 B.R. 277, 285 ; Hays & Co., 885 F.2d at 1155 (nonsignatory liquidator could be compelled to arbitrate claims that were derivative of the debtor but not a fraudulent-transfer claim brought on behalf of the debtor’s creditors); Amcomp Preferred Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Federated Mgt. Co. v. Coopers Lybrand, Unpublished Decision (12-21-2004)green1 sentence2011Co. v. Coopers & Lybrand, Franklin App. No. 09AP-204, 2004-Ohio-6977, ¶13 (recognizing that “[c]reditors in a bankruptcy proceeding are considered ‘parties’ for res judicata purposes”). {¶ 19} Lantsberg, as the transferee in the fraudulent conveyance, was a party to the Greenspans’ bankruptcy proceeding insomuch as the court order settling the fraudulent transfer claim expressly barred further action against Lantsberg regarding this issue. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Home State Bank
green
2 sentences2023The “right to payment” means “nothing more nor less than an enforceable obligation.” Johnson v. Home State Bank, 501 U.S. 78, 83 , 111 S.Ct. 2150 , 115 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991). {¶90} Under the circumstances in this case, the trial court did not err in denying Appellants’ motion for directed verdict on the fraudulent transfer claim and allowing the jury to consider the application of the UFTA. 2023The “right to payment” means “nothing more nor less than an enforceable obligation.” Johnson v. Home State Bank, 501 U.S. 78, 83 , 111 S.Ct. 2150 , 115 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991). {¶90} Under the circumstances in this case, the trial court did not err in denying Appellants’ motion for directed verdict on the fraudulent transfer claim and allowing the jury to consider the application of the UFTA. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Kingston of Miamisburg, L.L.C. v. Jeffery
neutral
1 sentence2022Id. {¶45} As stated, Appellant first claims that Appellee failed to establish that Joann was insolvent and that proof of insolvency is a necessary element of establishing a fraudulent transfer in violation of R.C. 1336.04. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Parmatown south assn. v. Atlantis realty co., L.T.D.
green
1 sentence2020Cuyahoga No. 106503, 2018-Ohio-2520 , cited by the appellants, does not stand for the proposition that a creditor-debtor relationship must exist with the transferee under the Act. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
D'Amore v. Matthews, 91420 (1-15-2009)
neutral
1 sentence2018Cuyahoga No. 91420, 2009-Ohio-131, ¶ 14 . {¶21} Initially, the record in this case reflects that UBS did not assert a fraudulent transfer claim against AIM. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.
green
1 sentence2016Williams, 83 Ohio St.3d at 476 . {¶147} The survival of the civil conspiracy claim is dependent upon this court’s ruling on the fraudulent transfer claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Brown Bark II, L.P. v. Coakley
green
1 sentence2015Brown Bark II, L.P. v. Coakley, 188 Ohio App.3d 179 , 2010- Ohio-3023, ¶10 (10th Dist.2010). {¶31} Under their first challenge to Poss’s fraudulent transfer claim, appellants assert that he should not have been allowed to proceed on his claim because it was not brought in a timely manner. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Zoldan v. Chaffee
green
1 sentence2015Trumbull No. 2014-T-0002, 2014-Ohio-5472, ¶19 . {¶52} Consistent with the foregoing analysis, this court holds that Poss was able to satisfy the standard for summary judgment as to all elements for a fraudulent transfer claim under R.C. 1336.04(A)(1). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Pine Top Insurance v. Republic Western Insurance
green
2 sentences2011Co. (N.D.Ill.1990), 123 B.R. 277, 285 ; Hays & Co., 885 F.2d at 1155 (nonsignatory liquidator could be compelled to arbitrate claims that were derivative of the debtor but not a fraudulent-transfer claim brought on behalf of the debtor’s creditors); Amcomp Preferred Ins. 2011Co. (N.D.Ill.1990), 123 B.R. 277, 285 ; Hays & Co., 885 F.2d at 1155 (nonsignatory liquidator could be compelled to arbitrate claims that were derivative of the debtor but not a fraudulent-transfer claim brought on behalf of the debtor’s creditors); Amcomp Preferred Ins. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Amcomp Preferred Insurance Co. v. Koken
neutral
2 sentences2011Co. v. Koken (Fla.App.2005), 916 So.2d 986 (liquidator not compelled to arbitrate claim to recover preferential payments). 2011Co. v. Koken (Fla.App.2005), 916 So.2d 986 (liquidator not compelled to arbitrate claim to recover preferential payments). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Esteco v. Kimpel, 07 Co 3 (12-20-2007)
green
1 sentence2010No. 07 CO 3 , 2007-Ohio-7201 , 2007 WL 4696855 , ¶ 20. {¶ 11} The trial court did not conclude that plaintiffs complaint was deficient in alleging the elements of a fraudulent-transfer claim. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.
green
2 sentences1999Roark Cos., Inc. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 274 , 277 , 617 N.E.2d 1075 . 1999Roark Cos., Inc. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 274 , 277 , 617 N.E.2d 1075 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.